01:42:43 crazy idea, dunno really where to post it. but basically create an incentive game to optimize wallet scanning and general speedups 01:43:33 so, the gist is you publish a mnemonic phrase, so all participants know the wallet 01:44:08 then, as the gamemaster, you connect to a random remote node that has met some criteria (somehow you can tell its a well run remote node) 01:44:38 also, the node IP also publishes their optimizations on their http port for the remote node 01:44:52 that part could get weird. 01:45:05 optimize wallet scanning? 01:45:07 but yeah. the gamemaster scans for these remote node participants 01:45:22 and then broadcasts a transaction by connecting directly to one 01:45:34 so that node has to have the wallet up and be able to scan it before broadcasting it 01:45:46 somehow gotta find a way to make sure they are broadcasting all txs they receive 01:46:44 hrm, this idea might be more swiss cheese than my original thoughts had about it 01:50:18 i guess you could runa lot of nodes, and record that nodes behavior compared to any other random node 01:52:20 Where do bob and jane come into the picture though gingeropolous ? 09:16:15 gingeropolous: funny, your last thought here is exactly what bitpay said they do to protect against double spends. i forget the figure, but they deployed a lot of relay nodes only for the purpose of heuristics 09:20:42 reddit is really slow going, would you be kind enough to upvote my topic? https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/qvv8ju/roast_my_monero_project/ 10:04:26 how should we interpret that a coin has PHs but one tenth market cap of a GHs coin?(like monero) 10:12:10 The speeds of different mining algorithms are not comparable 10:12:29 Apples and oranges and all that 10:17:45 chomwitt: look at power expenditure, decentralization, possibility of other hardware attacking the chain ... 10:32:37 but the money value of the hardware that sustain a PH network would be at least 100 more than the value of the hardware that sustains a GH network 10:33:14 https://miningpoolstats.stream/ 10:35:02 you can't ignore the watt-per-hash cost of running it .... 10:38:47 xmm .. if i filter only SHA256 networks my variables seems indeed to relate 10:39:10 i mean hash rate and market cap 10:39:57 right, you can hardly compare e.g. bitcoin hashes with Monero hashes 10:44:23 "but the money value of the..." <- Nope. The same hardware running two different mining algorithms would yield two diffwrent mining speeds 10:45:02 you're right 10:45:21 "xmm .. if i filter only SHA256..." <- What you are (indirectly) seeing is a profitability comparison of coins with the same mining algorithm 10:46:07 (Profitability depends on hardware efficiency for that algo, electricity price, coin emission, and coin price) 10:47:02 isnt there (in SHA256) a corelation between network hashrate and market cap? 10:47:07 * chomwitt brb 10:54:15 Greater mcap comes from greater price, which brings greater mining profitability 10:55:26 (Though you also have the number of coins in circulation affecting mcap, so it's more of a correlation than an exact proportionality - unlike coin price, which directly affects profits) 10:55:32 Umbrellas cause rain 10:58:20 i dont say cause-relation. just relation. 10:59:55 in SHA256 land it would be abnormal to see a coin with one order of magnitude bigger cap to have an order of magnitude lower hashrate 11:01:28 that is likely true for most coins 11:01:37 namecoin seems abnormal thougth 11:02:35 and emercoin 11:04:21 arent you curious? in SHA256-land how your networks has hashrate bigger than bitcoin ! but x1000000 lower market value? 11:04:52 i refer to emercoin 11:07:51 there is no way that hashrate has comparable energy epxenditure as bitcoin 11:45:01 "and emercoin" <- That's a merge-mined coin though 11:45:24 So their total network hashrate is not really "entirely theirs" 11:46:31 Merge-mining is a bit more complicated to handle 11:47:56 If you look at https://miningpoolstats.stream/emercoin you'll see that they only "really" have ~22EH/s 11:53:42 i see , it not a solid SHA256 pow. it has mainly PoS 13:05:34 its how much watt per h/s chomwitt . we could make a PoW thats 2+2, and make specialized hardware thats expensive. The hashrate would be 9000 kerblillion hashes per second, which is like 10000x a petahash. but 2+2 is easy 16:20:36 hi 16:21:06 hows it going 16:27:23 anyone use the fone for mining? 16:49:59 hiii 17:12:17 q1: hi 17:13:14 anyone mining from phone? 17:13:41 not I 17:13:44 Someone is. 17:15:13 I'm trying.... 17:15:19 like tryhard 17:16:04 Can't imagine a phone would be profitable. 17:16:11 Are you expecting to make a profit, or just contribute hashrate to the network, or what? 17:16:25 Epsilon: It's not with any phone I know. 17:17:12 Well, *maybe* just for *you*, if you do it with stolen or thrown-away phones and plug them into the power outlets at coffee shops, or something like that. 17:22:05 just contribute 17:22:30 it's an 8core at 3GHz 17:22:40 6GB RAM 17:22:53 more than this machine lol 17:23:42 That phone is probably faster than my laptop... 17:26:22 but I can't install unbound libs on termux 17:26:50 so...hmmm :/ 17:26:57 tryhard 17:27:34 q1: Good luck. 17:27:43 I hope that's not bad for the phone's CPU. 17:27:45 thx 17:27:53 quite welcome 17:28:09 <3 17:29:25 I like contributions to network security. 17:30:22 I'm not saying I mine Monero, but if I did I'd aim for at least some miner level of profitability. 17:30:29 s/miner level/minor level/ 17:30:30 oops 17:32:36 you can do it with any old machine or raspberry pi 17:41:40 also github is slow as hell today 17:44:14 Some CPUs are just not quite as okay with being run at 100% for extended periods of time. 17:45:00 O_o 17:45:02 how is it 17:45:29 I'm not sure what you're asking/saying. 17:46:11 I mean, why not? 17:48:08 poor heat management, at a guess 17:49:31 Damn Kraken no-longer supports Monero :( 17:54:10 Oh, is it official now? 17:54:30 I heard there was some kind of freeze on some Monero activity there, but wasn't sure whether that was standard policy now. 17:55:03 I'd rather use a less KYC/AML-friendly way to buy Monero, anyway, if I hypothetically wanted to buy some. 17:55:42 e.g. buy BCH and use that to buy Monero, if that was an option 17:56:20 Epsilon: How do you know that? 17:56:49 rbrunner: reddit.com/r/monero :P 17:57:50 Oh, in the UK. 18:00:05 Wonderful Brexit working wonders again? Damn do they have it better now than the poor people they left behind in the EU :) 18:02:53 ok guys 18:03:02 if you have some old fones over there 18:03:35 you can adb sideload xmrig after compiling 19:02:54 you guys gave me quite the scare. my US kraken accounts still support monero, though 19:03:23 including the USD pair 19:14:20 gingeropolous, thanks for the insight on watt per h/s . 19:22:18 It should be noted that XMRig is not only used for malicious purposes, since it is used legitimately by a large community of miners whose sole objective is to obtain an economic profit. 19:26:44 q1: Umm . . . what? 19:26:49 What are the malicious purposes? 19:27:02 I don't know of any use of XMRig for malicious purposes. 19:27:16 gov is tryin to ban 19:27:22 xmrig AND monero 19:27:26 okay 19:27:30 apotheon: running it on someone else's hardware without their permission would be the obvious one 19:27:38 there are plenty of fake news 19:27:44 didnt u c them? 19:27:47 Oh. Is that even practical with XMRig? 19:27:57 apparently 19:28:05 sure, why not? 19:28:18 they say some criminals use it for malicious purposes 19:28:19 pop a box and run xmrig on it... 19:28:22 q1: I don't follow the news much. It seems there are two types of news in the mainstream news sources: fake and pointless. 19:28:26 i mean, wtf 19:28:28 lol 19:28:48 I know they claim Monero (XMR) is used for malicious purposes. 19:28:54 they don't say WHICH ones 19:28:58 hmm 19:29:09 ofc, money laundry 19:29:12 maliciously . . . helping secure a network against scams and hostile takeovers 19:29:33 The problem is that money laundering isn't necessarily malicious. 19:29:37 and gov fees 19:29:56 / tracking 19:30:05 I need a nap. 19:30:22 +