03:36:38 <gingeropolous> yanmaani, i think its because the binaries contain the block header hashes or something to speed up old chain sync
07:03:26 <alMalsamo> Does anyone know an exchange where I can go from XMR to Solana with NO KYC?
07:50:37 <moneromooo> Embedded hashes are small now. Like 256 kB small or so.
07:50:48 <moneromooo> Used to be large.
08:19:04 <Bill48105> oh hey moooo what up
08:19:31 <Bill48105> !tip Bill48105@twitter $0.01
08:19:50 <Bill48105> swore it was on ! in here
08:19:58 <Bill48105> .xmr
08:19:58 <Wallet> Bill48105: ≈$154.6272 • ≈ value of: 1 XMR • Source: cmc/ccc/altm
08:20:08 <Bill48105> .tip Bill48105@twitter $0.01
08:20:09 <Wallet> Bill48105 tipped 0.00006472 XMR (≈$0.01) to Bill48105 on twitter [6929b1cd]
08:20:13 <Bill48105> added twitter support :)
09:28:35 <Guest1111> hello
09:28:54 <Guest1111> do anyone knows how to buy monero in russia now?
15:18:01 <apotheon> Bill48105: Is there a way to link an IRC account to Twitter, if someone tips you there, without exposing spending capabilities to Twitter?
15:18:50 <apotheon> I'd frankly expect cryptocurrency tipping on Twitter with spending capability to incentivize cracking people's Twitter accounts.
16:11:32 <garth> fluffypony: that CryptoNote repo is really interesting. Why keep all those versions of the whitepaper? Are there differences between them?
16:12:12 <garth> Vansaberhagen PGP key is interesting
16:12:28 <garth> Digitally signed pdfs from “2012” haha
16:24:32 <fluffypony> garth: there are 4 different whitepaper versions
16:24:38 <fluffypony> 0991a415944a34618e01fc25a29f0e3d25eef33cb0ed5608aa6d7bfdc917ab0f  analysed_whitepaper_v1.pdf
16:24:40 <fluffypony> 376aba3f33529a575bf2728d147ce2cfadb925d32cb98abc7535f186b9497450  analysed_whitepaper_v2.pdf
16:24:40 <fluffypony> 376aba3f33529a575bf2728d147ce2cfadb925d32cb98abc7535f186b9497450  bcn_whitepaper_old.pdf
16:24:40 <fluffypony> 30368fe727b58f341d3f2590bf4ab3f5e28321e1eafabb78852e799ac0257349  whitepaper_cnnew.pdf
16:24:40 <fluffypony> 252f5addbdcf1b5f51a1bcc297891b251a1d33ad8579d4ebead7578fba7dc0d6  whitepaper_tor.pdf
16:24:41 <fluffypony> 252f5addbdcf1b5f51a1bcc297891b251a1d33ad8579d4ebead7578fba7dc0d6  whitepaper_v1_cnnew.pdf
16:24:54 <fluffypony> the reason for keeping them is that I identified where I downloaded it from
16:39:08 <garth> Super interesting, Ric 
18:09:24 <Bill48105> apotheon: yes you use move command on bot which runs a wizard to prove ownership of both accounts to link them. and yes obviously linking accounts adds attack vector but either could be attacked anyway, but EITHER could be after. Enabling 2fa on Wallet is recommended either way
18:10:08 <apotheon> I'm specifically asking about linking them *without* letting the Twitter side spend.
18:10:37 <louipx> use 2fa
18:10:38 <Bill48105> there is no read only linking if that's what you're asking
18:11:05 <apotheon> No, not "read only"; receive-not-spend.
18:11:09 <Bill48105> 2fa limits use without being unlocked depending on which layer
18:11:30 <Bill48105> if you're that worried about access don't link them
18:11:45 <apotheon> Someone could presumably send to a Twitter account, but unless the Twitter account can be prevented from spending there's a potential problem there that could result in Twitter account takeover.
18:11:48 <Bill48105> nothing requires you to link accounts
18:12:02 <apotheon> . . . because there could then be more motivation to take over the Twitter account.
18:12:08 <Bill48105> kek
18:12:13 <Bill48105> you're way overthinking it
18:12:15 <Bill48105> WAYYYY
18:12:24 <apotheon> Twitter is a huge, open target.
18:12:24 <Bill48105> creating problems that dont exist
18:12:33 <Bill48105> and irc isnt?
18:12:36 <apotheon> Accounts get compromised all the time.
18:12:38 <Bill48105> twitter is more securet han irc..
18:12:44 <apotheon> No, because mostly people don't care about IRC.
18:12:50 <Bill48105> kek
18:12:52 <Bill48105> anyway
18:13:00 <apotheon> . . . and browsers are obvious attack vectors.
18:13:11 <Bill48105> you need a hobby
18:13:34 <apotheon> I'll take that as a "no" to my question.
18:13:45 <Bill48105> i fucking answered you multiple times
18:13:46 <apotheon> "no" and "never"
18:13:49 <apotheon> kinda
18:13:52 <Bill48105> you just didn't like the answer
18:14:05 <louipx> yea also don't link
18:14:09 <Bill48105> 1) no one requires you to link accounts 2) use 2fa 3) don't keep your life savings on a rando tip bot
18:14:09 <apotheon> I didn't like the lack of specifically answering the key part of what I was asking.
18:15:01 <apotheon> You clearly don't care about understanding the actual question, but it got answered semi-accidentally anyway.
18:15:05 <Bill48105> not sure what to tell you
18:15:06 <louipx> the solution is to not link them
18:15:20 <louipx> and transfer any tips from twitter to a different account
18:15:37 <Bill48105> i regularly come across people who want to create issues that don't exist just to fucking argu
18:15:41 <louipx> with zero fee
18:16:14 <Bill48105> you asked i answered. you moved goal posts I answered again. quit wasting my time
18:17:33 <Bill48105> no one is making you link accounts. if you feel twitter is unsafe dont the bot there. don't link it. don't use twitter at all if you're that paranoid. but the weak link is the user.