00:11:32 Yes, localmonero.co is a popular platform 00:12:25 DrNick2, Localmonero is good. Make sure you use a reputable seller. 00:14:14 Sweet! 00:21:32 .cz btc usdt 01:26:16 Woo! I got a tiny amount of XMR from the Faucet. Alas it looks like the daemon is down and it can't send any XMR. 01:26:37 Also the amount is way less than the min amount it will send. I guess that's not a huge suprise. :-D 01:27:24 DrNick2: What faucet do you mean? 01:27:43 The one in #tippero 01:27:46 (Wallet) 01:27:53 ah 01:28:16 I see that now. 01:47:42 I'm trying to trade with someone listed as "Seen just now" 2 hours ago and they've not responded. Hope that's not a red flag. :-) 01:53:37 Hopefully no one has collected on this reward: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2020/09/14/irs-will-pay-up-to-625000-if-you-can-crack-monero-other-privacy-coins 01:56:47 DrNick2: just seen now means that they are logged on not necessarily that they are actively monitoring 01:57:27 nioc: Ahhh, cool. Sounds like I just need to be more patient. 02:12:26 DrNick2: its some bug with the API supposedly. you should be able to withdraw once you collected enough 02:16:28 Anyone here use Kovri? 02:19:34 Ahhhh is the website down or what https://getkovri.org/index.html 02:21:13 Does not seem updated in a while: https://gitlab.com/kovri-project/kovri 02:22:52 kovri.io redirects to some GoDaddy bullshit 02:28:35 /r/kovri also seems dead 02:31:08 no one in #kovri or #kovri-dev 02:44:46 kovri development stopped years ago 02:45:00 nothing was ever released 03:35:00 Yeah, it's a pretty dead project. 11:53:29 09:27 moneromooo: The better stopgap is what it always has been. Don't insert your wallet into some random unknown's open port. 11:53:29 09:28 moneromooo: It's a stopgap, a solution, and the right way to do things. 11:53:29 09:29 moneromooo: Start equating this with safe sex and people will start getting the idea. 11:53:29 09:29 moneromooo: (maybe) 11:53:47 just saw that lol 11:55:11 1-65535 are technically 'orifices'.. 13:02:08 I'm making this meme and need to choose three adjectives that describes monero, which one? suggestions: private, fungible, decentralised, fair, secure, scarce, open source, untraceable, sound money. 13:03:05 http://0x0.st/ocgt.png 13:04:12 this isn't a meme, this is begging :^) 13:05:30 a begging meme :) 13:14:05 not a meme 13:14:42 nice gfx tho 13:27:23 https://decrypt.co/98023/monero-faithful-threaten-bank-run-on-centralized-exchanges 13:45:59 ok, let me rephrase, I'm utilizing a meme for the qr code, anyway, what I'm stuck on is what adjectives to use! 13:46:12 can't use them all 😅 13:50:51 just nestle that in a comfy bed of adjectives 14:00:09 also, nobody tell him that technically because of tail emission monero also has infinite supply, but shh 14:01:46 question 14:02:09 is a LUKS encrypted USB stick without header enough for a cold storage? 14:02:42 as long as the keyfile is encrypted and it's on a USB stick and I don't have my seed or wallet that should be pretty secure right? 14:03:22 if that's the only copy and you lose it you will hate yourself so maybe have another usb with the same data 14:03:36 and regularly check they still work :P 14:03:41 thanks :P 14:04:27 i have no cold storage though i just keep my seeds in my password manager and trust that it's encrypted in there ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:04:43 or rather i trust the pm's encryption 14:04:54 but this way i can't accidentally lose my keys 14:05:10 and nobody should get into my password manager in the first place 14:32:27 klaxa: hmm... maybe I should change it to 'printable' ;) 14:33:04 just put "brrrrrrt" 14:39:05 http://0x0.st/ocEZ.png 17:44:28 I suspect you're more likely to lose your keys vs have them stolen 17:52:04 depends 17:58:54 Having your keys stored unencrypted where you keep your important papers feels like a good approch. 17:59:08 Unless your talking about huge amounts. Not sure what I'd do in that case. :-) 17:59:39 unencrypted sounds bad, at least password protect it 18:00:40 You've got to think about your threat model. What are you protecting against in that case? 18:00:54 Someone breaking into your house and stealing the paper? 18:01:18 Then they need to recognise the importance of the info and use it. 18:01:49 Vs forgetting the password after hitting your head (or just with the passage of time). 18:02:36 If the risk of physical theft is high in your case, absolutely encrypt it. 18:06:48 good point 18:15:20 What about a vengeful wife who wants to leave you? 18:16:02 Or a wily squirrel who wants to eat your paper seed backup ? 18:16:08 don't marry, no vengeful wife 18:16:11 or marry a dude 18:16:17 still no vengeful wife 18:16:33 Or feed squirrels till they're really really full. 18:17:41 say what now? 18:27:03 what 18:28:52 yes, treat your squirrels well 18:29:48 squirrels are always a threat 18:30:11 in the tropics i have no squirrels 18:30:13 just bats 18:30:16 rats 18:30:17 and mosquitoes 18:30:25 am i to treat them well also? o_0 18:30:35 and lizards 18:32:24 don't know about mosquitos :D 19:05:47 Hello everybody. I've encountered the next warning "Transaction spends more than one very old output. Privacy would be better if they were sent separately." As far as I understood it's a simple warning and I can go simply with "yes" option. But I'm troubled that I don't completely understand what's it about and how to deal with it in "proper" way and not having such warnings 19:22:11 The fake output selection algorithm is heavily biased towards recent outs. 19:22:48 So if you have several old outs in your rings, they are more likely to be the real spends, since it is less likely they'd be randomly selected. 19:35:43 moneromooo: ty. So what can I do in order to calm this algoritm down? Make a transaction to myself for example? 19:37:54 The most private way is probably to spend one of these old outs to yourself then wait some random amount of time. 19:38:04 Well, N-1 of them if you have N. 19:39:05 Or just ignore. It can happen by random chance too. 19:46:25 moneromooo: many thanks 19:49:27 Some old outputs are expensive to spend. :( 19:50:11 Do you really mean that, or do you mean they're not worth shit ? :) 19:50:36 I mean it. 19:50:52 Pre Bulletproof outputs. 19:51:12 Oh. Hrm. I'm surprised, I expected old outs to make smaller txes per input. 19:51:17 Pre-rct you mean ? 19:51:23 ah... yes 19:51:39 Outputs that are like 4-5 years old. 19:51:55 Is my gray showing? 19:52:01 If they're pre ringct and mixable, they're used in the exact same way as rct outs, so same cost. 19:52:18 hmmm 19:52:29 If they're pre ringct and unmixable, they're spent in a v1 tx, with ring size 1, and that's got to be a lot smaller than a rct tx. 19:52:39 I think you're mistaken. 19:52:48 Unless there's a case I'm forgetting... 19:53:27 Could it be they *feel* expensive because it is when spending lots of outs that aren't worth shit ? 19:53:58 could be so 19:54:04 :D 19:55:20 yeah... it may be that 19:56:03 Just checking one of my wallets... oldest output is at about block 2.5m 19:56:07 so not really old. 19:56:33 Dude. 19:56:37 I just realized... 19:56:53 We could get some people get in here to chat, and they'd be born after monero started... 19:56:56 Wild. 19:57:15 This other wallet has outputs from 1.8m 19:57:28 lol... yeah... that'd be wild 19:58:20 "Did you know, before you were born, people were using a non private cryptocurrency called bitcoin" 19:58:38 "lol, what is privacy ?" 19:58:45 I think the chat would go that way. 19:58:49 Life sucks. 19:59:12 Young people have no expectations of privacy. 19:59:53 And their children will have none of freedom. Their grandchildren of life. They won't have grand grand children. 20:00:00 * moneromooo feeling down rn 20:00:45 Do you think that all the liberties will eventually shrinks to 0? 20:02:17 Happy Birthday montero 20:02:19 Historically, they do go down till a revolution (usually helped by hunger), then they drop to 0 at once, shit gets really bad for a generation, then it gets better than it used to be if yo're lucky. 20:03:24 It's not always down though, there's a random walk. But typically the average is slowly down. 20:04:49 And as long as people are fed, they can go a long while before revolting agianst the increasing erosion of freedom. 20:05:17 yeap 20:05:21 In a way, if your problem is privacy rather than hunger, you're in the lucky part of hte world. 20:05:36 ++ 20:05:46 all the successful revolutions I know have happened thanks to the elites 20:05:59 What is "elites" ? 20:06:47 those who have the means of power 20:06:53 folk like you moneromooo :) 20:07:12 So, the people who led a succesful revolution ended up in power ? That sounds circuitous. 20:07:33 Because you can't mean that the people who were in power led a succesful revolution against themselves :) 20:07:43 (or do you ?) 20:08:11 s/circuitous/circular/ 20:09:05 There are a lot of groups of power. Usually some of them trying to gain all the control overthrowing other groups 20:09:25 Ah, I see what you mean. 20:10:00 The French revolution, I think, was from the hungry people I believe. 20:10:39 The Romanian revolution wasn't from elites either I think. 20:11:05 But that doesn't prove you wrong of course, since those are just two points. 20:11:26 Nah, I don't thinks so at all. Some "progressive" aristocrats are always behind the scenes. 20:11:47 From time to time they dig their own graves though 20:12:44 OK, re-reading, you said "thanks to the elites", which is less strong that what I originally interpreted it as, so OK, I'm ready to believe you here. 20:13:05 I originally got that as "organized by", which wasn't a fair interpretation. 20:13:28 this is quite fair interpretation 20:37:13 What about the Monerevolution? 21:06:05 Ha! You guys should checkout the Revolutions podcast. Right up your alley. :-)