01:55:39 Why would my node get this error?: 2022-08-09 00:15:55.559 E Unable to send transaction(s) via Dandelion++ stem 01:56:37 dam, I forgot to delete the timestamp! 02:07:36 Steven_M: are you using --tx-proxy ? 02:07:58 otherwise how many in / out peers do you have when doing "status"? 02:12:25 selsta: 12(out)+71(in) 02:13:18 are you using v0.18? 02:24:10 selsta: yep 02:24:33 ok if everything else works then don't worry about it 02:24:45 seems like the node from the atem phase wasn't reachable 02:25:00 okay 02:27:01 I have another question, but I'd like to PM you for OPSEC reasons, may I? 02:29:08 https://monero.observer/moneromooo-monero-submits-pr-remove-cake-wallet-from-getmonero.org/ 02:32:15 ^feel free to post on Reddit, bot isn't cooperating with me today 02:35:23 posted 02:35:53 Almost as bad as bch bs 02:39:35 nah it flagged yours too 02:39:37 Awaiting moderator approval... 02:39:39 jeese 02:42:17 guess you can't post anything that has 'cake wallet' keywords in the title directly, without mod approval, which is not cool 02:42:53 hi 02:43:06 Hello 02:57:30 what's the point of posting this to reddit? 02:57:54 i've never seen a discussion improve that way 02:59:25 spreading the knowledge that this controversy exists 03:01:49 I live here selsta, and I didn't know about it. 03:03:58 the discussion was in #monero-site 03:04:18 yes 03:05:02 literally every second account on reddit is a bot 03:05:23 people can easily influence community sentiment 03:10:28 Community is really trying to live up to the "Monero is the real Bitcoin" thing... 03:12:52 escapethe3ra[m]: not sure if cakepay is relevant to the monero.com discussion 03:37:50 cakepay is an optional thing and everyone can decide themselves if they are okay with the privacy 03:38:31 with their privacy policy* 03:38:44 adding it to the current discussion feels a bit dishonest to me, comes of as trying to sway the opinion of the reader 03:46:44 maybe that's just how news sites work... 03:55:49 Steven_M: you can PM me but might take a bit until I reply 16:12:51 What is Monero's precise inflation rate policy? 16:14:55 IIRC, 0.6 monero floor subsidy per block. So once the decreasing subsidy formula drops below that, it's capped at 0.6. 16:15:03 A block every 2 minutes on average. 16:15:20 Thanks. What percentage per year does this translate to, now and in the future? 16:15:53 I think it's below 2% a year, possibly below 1%, can't recall. Never goes back up. 16:16:12 https://p2pool.io/tail.html 16:16:46 > Current annual inflation rate is 0.86893638% 16:16:58 if you watch the page long enough, you can see how % decreases bit by bit 16:17:15 so you're saying the rate will never go higher... 16:18:03 if will only go lower 16:18:03 correct, 0.6xmr per 2 minute block remains constant 16:18:07 Well, constant emission, and every growing total amount. 16:18:13 got it 16:18:42 Does any human or other agent have the power to change this emission rate? 16:19:13 I mean can a panel decide tomorrow to increase it if they wanted to? 16:21:34 I'm just asking from a safety pov. Can the panel, if it's small, be pressured to 1000x the emission rate... 16:22:03 no one will support this hardfork 16:23:19 i.e. see Monero Classic fork from 2018. They're still alive, increased daily emissions 20x, added dev tax and so on. 0 users, only miners left 16:23:32 good to know 16:24:35 Different question: These days, how much XMR does a transaction cost? 16:25:24 bc_dyn_stats 100 in monerod, take base fee, multiplty by... 1200 ? That's your typical tx cost. 16:26:15 sorry, I am a newb and I don't follow. 16:26:58 What's the tx cost in XMR? It's not 120,000. 16:27:05 bc_dyn_stats 100 is a command in monerod, tells you the current base fee per byte. A typical tx is maybe 1200 bytes. 16:27:16 minimal fee is 0.001$ for a transaction 16:27:22 yes, that's 0.1 US cent 16:27:33 so expensive 16:28:11 ha, thanks 16:28:12 They go up by about 5x soon though. 16:28:16 oh how come 16:28:34 Code change from the monero cabal. 16:28:58 and I really don't see people saying no and reverting that change. 16:29:00 but what's their reasoning other than greed 16:29:13 Mitigating spam. 16:29:32 sorry, what's spam in the context of a cryptocurrency...? 16:29:37 There is no monero cabal btw. If you thought a miner cabal :D 16:30:01 People sending a lot of transactions in order to increase nodes' verification CPU time and storage needs. 16:30:20 Is it an attack 16:30:34 Anyhow, ok 16:31:08 I hope Monero has plans in place to handle a Github ban of https://github.com/monero-project and of contributing users. 16:31:15 because it's just a matter of time before it happens 16:31:56 All org members can expect a sudden ban too. 16:32:48 and getmonero.org, that'll disappear too in the same week 16:33:07 so be prepared, anytime in the next decade or so 16:33:21 Yes. It can also be part of a privacy attack. But definitely a DoS attack if it's maintained for a while. 16:34:18 Monero project has prepared for github to get hostile since before M$ acquired it. All of that is a non-issue 16:34:29 hyc: is there a mirror? 16:34:33 hyc: .org is also dangerous 16:34:59 If both the github project and the .org site disappear at once, people will not know where to go 16:35:13 Riht before you joined, pony was talking about how github data is constantly backed up. 16:35:23 Well, monero github data. 16:35:40 That's great but people already need to know in advance where to go when it disappears along with the current website 16:36:04 In that case, it's repo.getmonero.org, so it htey both go at once, that'd be a problem, yes. 16:36:16 it happened to Tornado Cash, both disappeared 16:36:41 They were using the .cash website. 16:37:03 I don't know if .ph is safe because archive.ph hasn't died for some reason 16:37:21 But that was a mixer, I read. I suppose they might not care about intent, but... it feels a lot different. To me anyway. But point taken. 16:38:11 Is there an onion Tor web address for Monero project? 16:38:25 Wasn't repo.getmonero.org reachable via i2p ? Rings a bell... 16:38:56 i2p, onion, lokinet -- all are possible candidates for failsafe access 16:39:08 There is (a tor hidden service). I just looked. 16:39:28 Isn't unstoppableweb all about domains that can't be stopped? 16:39:46 http://monerotoruzizulg5ttgat2emf4d6fbmiea25detrmmy7erypseyteyd.onion for the record. 16:39:51 cool 16:40:05 People will go to Wikipedia to see what the official link is, so pls update that when it happens 16:40:20 Automated parsers of search engines also look there. 16:40:44 * moneromooo waits for wikipedia to mysteriously switch to monero dot com... 16:40:58 lol 16:41:09 but IMO Monero must at all costs be ready in advance, otherwise XMR-USD price will crater 50-80% 16:41:15 within a week 16:41:27 ^^ that's proof all of this has already been planned for 16:41:40 you're preaching to the choir 16:41:47 and your sermon is 5 years old 16:41:56 well that's good to hear but as a user I need to see it, right? 16:42:10 and I am not seeing mirror links on https://github.com/monero-project 16:42:29 Well, never hurts to help do what you think should be done. 16:42:39 no point. in an attack, any regularly registered domain would be targeted as well 16:43:34 yeah 16:43:53 our primary backup domains aren't public for a reason 16:44:03 ok 16:44:03 we learned from TPB :) 16:44:04 what matters is that PGP keys for signing official content are registered in public keyservers 16:44:49 and our backup plans for GitHub have been in place since 2018 16:46:25 Good stuff, but if the naive user doesn't immediately see it, the XMR-USD price risks cratering very quickly. If they can quickly see the backup up, then maybe they won't sell. 16:46:43 Place low buy orders ? 16:46:55 ;) 16:47:01 Wait. Exchanges will go too anyway. 16:47:06 ^^ 16:47:34 Hopefully there exist enough swap sites already. 16:48:27 Exchanges are then legally targetable mostly only if they support XMR <-> USD. 16:48:46 If they support XMR <-> [not USD] <-> USD, then they'd be less targetable. 16:49:25 Why would monero be targetted then ? We're just monero <-> monero. 16:50:08 If you have to ask, "for facilitating money laundering", similar to how Tornado Cash was recently targeted. 16:50:27 I care about the project so that's why I brought up the topic. 16:50:38 Then why would exchanges somehow keep monero <-> not-USD ? 16:51:49 I don't understand 16:52:17 This is in reply to "Exchanges are then legally targetable mostly only if they support XMR <-> USD.". I don't think it makes sense. 16:52:42 None of this makes rational sense but it makes sense to the US govt 16:52:48 so I'm going by how they think 16:53:12 If they (I'll assume "they" here is US govt and people wanting not to cross them) kill getmonero.org, which definitely doesn't do any money laundering, why would an exhcnage carrying monero be allowed to continue ? It seems nonsensical. 16:53:17 If they see that an international exchange is facilitating XMR <-> USD transactions, that's the legal reason that the US govt have to target the exchange. 16:53:46 moneromooo: Don't think by your rationality. It doesn't apply here. Logic doesn't apply here. It's the history of reasoning of the US govt that applies. 16:53:58 It's like when you're dealing with women, don't play by male logic. 16:54:34 Do we have different logic ? 16:54:59 The reason, as I read, is that facilitating XMR <-> USD transactions puts US banks at risk 16:55:13 and so that's reason enough for the US govt to target such exchanges 16:55:38 From the outside, it's a retarded reason but I'm saying how they think. 16:58:11 imo, Monero can expect to grow a lot, and with this growth can come nasty attention of the govt. 17:04:14 If the exchanges only supports XMR <-> not-USD <-> USD, then the US govt doesn't have an equally strong legal qualification to target it. 17:05:34 Evolver, Monero already has nasty government attention. 17:05:50 sure, which is why most US exchanges don't support it directly 17:06:15 but it hasn't seen worse levels of it yet, as for example what Tornado Cash saw 17:06:26 The greater the adoption, the worse it gets. 17:06:48 apples and oranges 17:07:17 fwiw apparently the Treasury has warned Tornado Cash in the past, as far as I know they didn't do that with monero yet. 17:07:28 I see 17:10:20 At some point we need to remove the Kovri repo from the project 17:10:52 Though the story, I assume, will live on into eternity 17:11:15 oh I see three kovri repos. Yeah, no reason for it to share the risk. 17:12:29 although I see it's just an obsolete old version from 2018 17:12:41 so it's not even about risk 17:13:57 garth: mininero should go 17:14:30 Hmm. Actually, keeping monero command line will ensure only geeks use it, not money launderers. 17:14:46 Though I guess they could hire geeks. 17:15:14 garth: kastelo repo should probably also be separate 17:15:55 there is no risk with these repos 17:16:06 The risk is to the repos, not to Monero from them 17:16:31 an unnecessary risk 17:16:56 although I get it that it helps facilitate control 17:17:14 Wouldn't want anyone mucking with the code in those repos. 17:20:08 kovri / kastelo are dead 17:22:37 Someone can maybe mirror Monero to https://radicle.network/ , even officially if possible 17:27:49 yet another Intel SGX breach https://twitter.com/arstechnica/status/1557052095651618821 17:29:56 Fascinating 21:09:57 Sorry for this noob question, but if I run a Monero node, can I expect to make anything? If yes, then how much per month? 21:10:33 I don't mean for mining, just for transactions. 21:11:04 no 21:11:21 you don't get a reward for it 21:11:33 so who runs nodes then? big holders? 21:11:42 or just the miners? 21:11:51 Anybody who wants to help the network 21:13:58 Everyone runs a node for privacy and safety 21:14:03 remote nodes can be malicious 21:14:25 I am assuming that some wallet software have their own nodes for protecting their users. 21:14:39 or do they