01:00:16 Revuo Monero. Issue 141: October 6 - 13, 2022. http://revuo-xmr.com/issue-141.html 01:57:02 revuoxmr: Nice 08:52:24 revuoxmr: the onion doesn't load for me. Using the TOR browser I can get to the https site. TOR detects that there is an onion available and asks me if I want to switch to that. But they it can't load it: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at trocadorfyhlu27aefre5u7zri66gudtzdyelymftvr4yjwcxhfaqsid.onion. 08:52:45 *then 09:01:20 revuoxmr: sorry I realise now I meant to reply to the author(s) of the trocador service (linked in the Revuo Monero Issue 141) 13:48:40 MajesticExchange, I get "Deceptive site ahead" when trying to go to your site with Firefox. 13:58:10 Which TLD do you use? With https://majesticbank.sc/ I don't get such a warning, with ".is" I get one - but is that even correct? 13:59:00 (I got that .is from a screenshot today about a possible scam regarding Cake Wallet, where people were adviced to change their remote nodes.) 13:59:50 https://majesticbank.su/ exists as well, and does not get me a warning either 14:02:52 rbrunner, the .is domain which comes up as the first search result with DDG. 14:03:06 The two that you provided are fine here too. 14:03:58 Hmm, but majesticbank.is does not even seem to exist right now? 14:04:27 majesticbank.is has been reported as a deceptive site. You can report a detection problem or ignore the risk and go to this unsafe site. 14:05:14 Yup, and if I try that, I only get an error message DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN in Chrome, but no site whatsoever. What do you get? 14:05:33 I mean, if you try to go ahead to the site despite the warning? 14:06:13 (Of course ok if you *don't* want to go there ...) 14:06:33 I never went. 14:06:54 Maybe .is was once their's, they let it expire, a scammer took it for a while, but vanished now? 14:07:45 possibly... no idea 14:07:52 It is one of my little joys in life to go to such "deceptive sites" :) 14:08:12 More often than not they are already deleted, e.g. fishing pages 14:09:19 It gets confusing a bit. They also have https://majesticbank.ru/ 14:09:37 So .ru, .sc, .su are ok, but .is not? 14:11:23 I guess 14:24:38 I find this "branding" of Majestic a bit confusing. Normally you concentrate everything to one domain. Maybe there are "historical" reasons for the various domains? 14:30:55 There definitely should be their site at that address, as this shows: https://whois.domaintools.com/majesticbank.is 19:05:06 Is there a way to move Monero between wallets with no transaction fee, assuming both wallet's private keys are known? (Curious if I can rotate keys while keeping all my balance, without having to pay an intermediate fee.) 19:06:42 Does sweep_all incur a fee? 19:07:16 Looks like it 19:07:47 Maybe not? 19:11:05 Sweeping involves a transaction like any other, the only difference is that it allows you to completely clear a wallet 19:12:21 Is there any practical difference between sending a transaction normally for the entire balance versus sweeping? 19:12:55 Er, I guess any difference at all 19:13:17 The protocol allows for any fee, including 0, but you'd need a custom wallet implementation to create such a tx, and then modify your node so that it doesn't refuse to relay it due to the low fee - but other non-modified nodes would still refuse to relay it further, so you'd have to mine it yourself 19:14:57 Sweeping = spending one/all inputs entirely, so that the amount you send is exactly the sum of all inputs minus the txfee 19:16:12 Right, but is this any different from just sending normally, is sweeping just a shortcut to that? 19:16:43 In a "normal" transaction you decide manually how much you want to spend - but since you don't know how much the fee will be, you might have some dust left in the wallet afterwards 19:17:03 Yes, sweeping is just a shortcut 19:17:15 Other than that, it's a regular tx 19:38:41 Is the fee not decided at broadcast time by the wallet/user, merope? I don't understand your "you don't know how much the fee will be" part, then -- unless you mean since the fee is automatically determined by communicating with the node? 19:43:31 The official wallets (and those who use the standard monero library) don't let you specify the exact fee amount like in other cryptos. Instead, the fee is determined dynamically, and you can select a "priority level" multiplier if you want 19:44:02 And yes, the base fee is determined by the node 19:45:25 (In fact, there have been some malicious public nodes who have made users spend very large amounts in fees because they didn't doublecheck) 19:48:46 (More specifically: the node tells you the base fee/kb, which you then multiply by the kb of your tx and by your priority multiplier) 20:46:33 guys, hope i dont get kicked for this....but can anyone throw out an exchange or 2 that doesnt do KYC? 20:50:01 trying to get started and and lets face it, using traditional exchanges flies in the face of what XMR is meant for 20:50:45 exactly - but people dont really care 20:50:59 ugh, that bad, eh? 20:51:16 https://kycnot.me/ 20:51:37 For crypto to crypto ? Cex? 20:51:39 Tradeogre and kucoin 20:51:56 Fiat to crypto, localmonero and bisq 20:51:57 no, fiat to crypto 20:59:36 https://bisq.wiki/How_do_I_send_fiat_to_Bisq 20:59:54 wierd, it says you can send with etransfer from your bank, but then says the above? 23:01:40 NSA is very old, indeed. 23:01:44 Was reading this article: http://0x0.st/ovEU.pdf 23:02:36 It mentions Sputnik, the Soviet satellite.