02:14:46 <fr33_yourself[m]> <xfedex[m]> "And no use worrying about tail..." <- Did you not see my comment that Monero's tail emission is perfect in my opinion and is effectively hard set?
02:21:08 <fr33_yourself[m]> https://youtu.be/2pxevg3jfRA
05:55:40 <narodnik> gm
14:51:09 <eudaimon36[m]> I feel like I should've understood this long ago, but: in the GUI wallets, is it right to understand that each GUI wallet has ONE and only one (primary) address, and that each time one "create(s) a new address" one is generating a "subaddress" from that one (and only one) (primary) address? 
14:53:56 <xfedex[m]> eudaimon36[m]: Yes, that's exact
14:54:20 <OffshoreExchange> You can verify this by looking at the first digit of the address. Subaddresses start with 8.
14:54:24 <eudaimon36[m]> xfedex[m]: OK, great, thanks! 
14:54:39 <eudaimon36[m]> OffshoreExchange: Yea, I noticed that. 
14:56:44 <eudaimon36[m]> Anyone familiar with this (i.e., use of subaddresses), in relation to the new notification in Bisq with the latest update? I am not at all sure what the update is even saying! lol
14:57:46 * eudaimon36[m] uploaded an image: (44KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/AZTRJomjToIUyhTwaRWJSckq/Screenshot%20from%202023-01-11%2009-57-01.png >
14:59:01 <ofrnxmr[m]> It means
14:59:04 <ofrnxmr[m]> Dont reuse addresses
14:59:17 <eudaimon36[m]> As it is written, it seems as if Bisq generates a new XMR subaddress to send funds to--but that can't be what it means. It must just mean that I need to create a new subaddress each time.
14:59:31 <ofrnxmr[m]> Anew mainaddress = new seed
14:59:31 <ofrnxmr[m]> New subaddresses per instance = self explanitory 
14:59:35 <eudaimon36[m]> Poor grammar
14:59:43 <ofrnxmr[m]> Make sure to increment = dont use subaddresses that have been used 
15:00:35 <eudaimon36[m]> eudaimon36[m]: (not you ofrnxmr...)
15:01:07 <ofrnxmr[m]> Its Saying during the update, create a new wallet or if too lazy, make sure to use the newest unused subaddress
15:01:21 <ofrnxmr[m]> My grandma isnt poor!
15:01:40 <eudaimon36[m]> So the notice should say: "Do not set a permanent receive address here after all, but rather change it for each swap."
15:01:41 <ofrnxmr[m]> cryptogrampy @cryptogrampy:monero.social:  please tell him the acxomdations are ok
15:01:52 <ofrnxmr[m]> Nope
15:02:40 <eudaimon36[m]> ofrnxmr[m]: is "increment" a technical term?
15:02:51 <ofrnxmr[m]> Its saying "previously, we didnt rotate subaddresses per trade. We do now. 
15:02:51 <ofrnxmr[m]> Easy methid: create and use a new wallet.
15:02:51 <ofrnxmr[m]> If you want to be a PITA, reuse the old Wallet but for opsec you have to make sure to use a new subaddress. Also, if you run more than one instance, done use the wallet on more than one"
15:03:16 <ofrnxmr[m]> eudaimon36[m]: Just means "use the next in line"
15:03:56 <eudaimon36[m]> eudaimon36[m]: But then this comment of mine seems right. Your "nope"?  
15:13:49 <eudaimon36[m]> <ofrnxmr[m]> "Its Saying during the update..." <- It seems Bisq IS generating the new subaddresses each time:
15:14:35 <ofrnxmr[m]> After update, should vw
15:14:35 * eudaimon36[m] uploaded an image: (25KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/NaWDJYJEMduAiyaBQljKAuSp/Screenshot%20from%202023-01-11%2010-10-34.png >
15:14:51 <ofrnxmr[m]> Should be*
15:16:16 <ofrnxmr[m]> plowsof @plowsof:matrix.org: 
15:16:34 <ofrnxmr[m]> He knows where to find my dms
16:21:52 <xfedex[m]> <eudaimon36[m]> "Anyone familiar with this (i.e.,..." <- It says that you should use a new subaddress for everything to reduce the chance of your identity getting linked
16:22:39 <eudaimon36[m]> xfedex[m]: Yes, but interestingly (to me, at least, Bisq itself generates these new subaddresses)
16:24:18 <nioc> I assume that they generate addresses for deposits and you generate addresses for withdrawals 
16:24:58 <nioc> disclaimer:  I haven't used bisq   
16:29:10 <Metro[m]> nice
16:51:04 <alpharabius[m]> Do you guys know anyone that does design
16:51:20 <alpharabius[m]> I need a 'gold accepted here' sign
17:10:23 <eudaimon36[m]> <eudaimon36[m]> "Screenshot from 2023-01-11 10-10..." <- Sorry I can't let this drop: is this language of "Account Index" and "Initial Subaddress Index" XMR's terminology?
17:15:44 <Rucknium[m]> eudaimon36: I read the notice. I think they dont understand Monero's mechanics. They think that sending coins to a subaddress more than once will trigger the burning bug. That's not correct.
17:17:26 <eudaimon36[m]> They don't seem to know what this language is on the screen means either. Just replying to my questions "I'm not into Monero, sorry"
17:17:39 <eudaimon36[m]> s/is//
17:18:11 <eudaimon36[m]> I just want to make sure I'm learning and using best practices.
17:19:39 <Rucknium[m]> The BISQ software itself is creating addresses? So it has your view key and primary address, at least
17:19:56 <eudaimon36[m]> Rucknium[m]: yep
17:20:16 <eudaimon36[m]> this is brand new
17:20:33 <eudaimon36[m]> I had previously just had one subaddress dedicated to Bisq swaps
19:53:38 <serpent[m]> hi all. i am from turkey and i want to buy vip membership on a forum but i couldn't figure out how can i buy and send to site owner but i couldn't figure out how can i do this
19:54:03 <serpent[m]> can someone help me? any help would be appreciated
22:21:18 <alpharabius[m]> https://xmr.homes/donate
22:51:01 <ofrnxmr[m]> Lol
22:54:20 <DanIsnotthemanBr> trying to beat general fund?
23:09:51 <alpharabius[m]> <DanIsnotthemanBr> "trying to beat general fund?" <- Nah, just making my own site for donations G
23:10:07 <alpharabius[m]> Yk, in case you might want to send a monero or two
23:10:09 <alpharabius[m]> Wink
23:10:27 <nioc> isn't there a rule against begging here?
23:11:33 <alpharabius[m]> It's not begging
23:11:50 <alpharabius[m]> Just showing off smth i did
23:12:04 <alpharabius[m]> Yk
23:14:29 <alpharabius[m]> ofrnxmr: you liek?
23:35:37 <ofrnxmr[m]> So much for 160
23:35:44 <ofrnxmr[m]> alpharabius: 
23:35:49 <ofrnxmr[m]> Do you need diapers now?