03:22:39 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: Paul Le Roux = Satoshi Nakamoto
03:23:19 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: TruCrypt
03:23:40 <dANBs[m]> s/TruCrypt/True'Crypt/
03:23:44 <dANBs[m]> s/TruCrypt/TrueCrypt/
03:27:29 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: I suggest everyone here sell their XMR for ARRR Piratechain
03:37:14 <plowsof11> what do with piratechain 
03:38:12 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: most anon cryptocurrency
03:38:27 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: easy to mine
03:38:52 <plowsof11> does it have a pre mine?
03:39:39 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: idk its just the most anon cyrpto
03:41:08 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: plowsof Trust me bruh
03:43:38 <plowsof11> i thought Dero was 
03:43:48 <plowsof11> i've lost track 
03:44:23 <CopenhagenBram[m> > TrueCrypt is a **discontinued** source-available freeware utility used for on-the-fly encryption (OTFE).
03:44:24 <CopenhagenBram[m> bruh needs to update to veracrypt
03:47:48 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: plowsof idk dero looks better then piratechain idk i mean we should support other privacy coins as like monero has taken some stuff from Firo
03:48:09 <CopenhagenBram[m> Vera wants you to use veracrypt
03:48:29 * CopenhagenBram[m uploaded an image: (2815KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/bQHgdFtODEOChxORfnHBCwLg/image.png >
03:49:43 <plowsof11> but pirate chain has a premine and other sus things regarding supply 
03:50:11 <plowsof11> firo has cool tech 
03:51:13 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: yeah i was joking about piratechain i wanted to try it but pissed me off and i think u have to download like a 10GB zcash network parameters
03:51:33 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: also they pissed me off aka by privacy larping
03:51:53 <plowsof11> everyone shuld sell their xmr and buy monero imo 
03:52:54 <CopenhagenBram[m> plowsof11: i rate monero a 5/7 perfect score
04:03:39 <MajesticBank> imposter
04:04:03 <MajesticBank> not sure what is point of creating fake account with my nick
04:04:43 <plowsof11> yeah, its obvious , best not mention it, just childish 
04:04:53 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: i didn't know someone had that name i am on xmpp side
04:06:00 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: Whats deal with the real Majestic Bank did they ever resolve the issues about exit scamming?... i haven't used them since but never got scammed by them
04:06:53 <plowsof11> this is not about a bad trade sir 
04:07:20 <MajesticBank> what's difference between sock and the puppet? puppet gets paid
04:09:29 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: i am not sock puppet i will change my name if u are getting triggered i can't see used usernames on my side of the xmpp bridge
04:09:29 <dANBs[m]> MajesticBank[xmpp]: roster
04:10:18 <MajesticBank> didn't knew room was bridged at all to xmpp
04:10:27 <MajesticBank> which room is it?
04:10:38 <plowsof11> no idea
04:11:23 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: wow double typed tried rejoining
04:12:35 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: idk everyone has a [m] next to their name is in the dANBs bridge
04:12:47 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: all i see is users
04:12:57 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: of xmpp
04:13:13 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: in my client
04:13:16 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: I assume [m] means matrix
04:14:34 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: anyway like i said I never got ripped off and or had any complaints with MajesticBank Swap/Exchange....haven't used since people said they were having problems as i did get scammed by another 20$ worth lol
04:15:09 <dANBs[m]> * by another exchange/swap 20$ worth
04:15:18 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: anyway like i said I never got ripped off and or had any complaints with MajesticBank Swap/Exchange....haven't used since people said they were having problems as i did get scammed by another exchange/swap $2o worth lol
04:15:19 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: anyway like i said I never got ripped off and or had any complaints with MajesticBank Swap/Exchange....haven't used since people said they were having problems as i did get scammed by another exchange/swap $20 worth lol
04:26:42 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: gonna sell my XMR for XRP
04:28:22 <cockliuser[m]> <MajesticBank> "didn't knew room was bridged..." <- Yeah, Matrix <-> IRC which is bridged to XMPP
04:28:53 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: Mossad Trix
04:30:42 <cockliuser[m]> dANBs[m]: Congratulations, you're going to become one of the few human XRP holders 🎉
04:30:51 <VoidStalker[m]> Matrix already has an XMPP bridge, called Bifrost. It makes actual users, instead of a bot putting the person's username in front of their message.
04:30:55 <MajesticBank> what's the xmpp room?
04:31:34 <VoidStalker[m]> But this conversation is quite off-topic, maybe it'd be better to discuss this here: #monero-offtopic:monero.social 
04:32:13 <cockliuser[m]> VoidStalker[m]: I think this Matrix isn't directly bridged to XMPP because it wasn't directly bridged to discord either
04:32:56 <VoidStalker[m]> VoidStalker[m]: 👆️
04:34:58 <dANBs[m]> Triggered[xmpp]: any news on Seraphis/Jamtis
05:15:25 <cockliuser[m]> <VoidStalker[m]> "👆️" <- Oh yeah crap I forgot this was #monero nvm, this matrix is bridged to xmpp and discord directly 
06:33:54 <CopenhagenBram[m> Would it ever be possible to use a POW setup for Monero that's based on protein folding, or BOINC projects, similar to Gridcoin?
13:07:10 <cockliuser[m]> How does merge mining work if the chain is stateful? Are you receiving transanctions from the mempool of both the chains? 
13:19:24 <moneromooo> The first question isn't clear to me, but for the second question, yes. Both daemons are running, at least in my case.
13:24:29 <hyc> CopenhagenBram[m: that has been discussed many times before. the biggest problem is that the results of a fold or BOINC work unit must be verified for correctness, and that can only be done by a centralized party
13:24:42 <hyc> centralization defeats the purpose of PoW
13:25:34 <hyc> ... assuming you actually want to do something useful/interesting with the computation result.
13:25:57 <hyc> if it's just to burn CPU cycles and throw away the result, then sure you could use those workloads
13:30:42 <cockliuser[m]> I meant that since transactions are usually added to a block before finding the solution, and since a transaction on chain 1 would be invalid on chain 2, how would a solution for chain 1 (other than an empty block) be a solution for chain 2?
13:33:53 <hyc> you only include the hash of a block in the merge chain in the block of the main chain
13:34:30 <hyc> (or vice versa, easy to get these backwards)
13:49:38 <moneromooo> I forget the details, but namecoin has a good description (which I based my code on) in its repo.