01:23:29 True 08:34:27 hi 08:34:40 how this checkpoint is created 08:34:42 ADD_CHECKPOINT2(2817000, "39726d19ccaac01d150bec827b877ffae710b516bd633503662036ef4422e577", "0x3900669561954c1"); 08:42:11 Guest3000 just call get_block_header_by_height RPC for this height and you'll get "hash": "39726d19ccaac01d150bec827b877ffae710b516bd633503662036ef4422e577" and "wide_cumulative_difficulty": "0x3900669561954c1" in the response 08:48:12 there is something like this on monerod 08:48:26 get_block_header_by_height 08:54:04 how to retrieve hash and difficulty from daemon and not rpc 10:04:15 I wonder why monero PoW uses CPU instead of GPU 10:04:15 i recently bought an AMD Ryzen for mining and not many option for cpu mined coin 10:04:15 while most PoW uses GPU , bigger coins like Bitcoin & Doge uses ASIC (an analog circuit dedicated to validate blocks) 10:05:42 CPU seems very old school isn't it? i believe bitcoin used that before 10:05:42 and they have the worst energy efficiency 10:06:50 what do you mean "CPUs have the worst energy efficiency" ? 10:07:05 >old school 10:07:07 not an argument 10:08:09 mlcboss if you are indeed curious about why the CPU mining route was taken, you should listen to howard chu's monero presentations and talks 10:08:13 CPU mining has almost the same "energy efficiency" compared to GPU/FPGA/ASIC mining 10:08:34 TL;DR CPU mining is a feature, not a bug 10:09:45 TL;DR it stops the big boys just coming in with huge mining farms and centralising power with ASICs imho. its a bonus feature. 10:11:07 Monero follows Satoshi's vision of "1 cpu 1 vote". Simply put, almost anyone can mine Monero with no initial cost, while with ASIC mining, only ASIC manifacturers and big players can actually profit from mining. GPU mining can be considered a middle ground between CPU and ASIC mining. 10:11:33 I don't think CPU mining stops big boys coming in, btw. I believe existing server farms for VPS'es can make use of their idle time (if any) with mining XMR---so you would be seeing, again, farms of centralized equipment mining monero. However, CPU mining seems to be the "most" centralized option out of the GPU and ASICs. 10:12:44 I meant most *decentralized 10:12:49 fucking freud 10:12:50 "what do you mean "CPUs have..." <- CPU is used for general computing 10:12:50 while ASIC is built dedicated to mining 10:12:50 they were built to be efficient machine for mining 10:13:26 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> CPU is used for general computing... (full message at ) 10:13:42 So, RandomX is using every piece and part of the CPU. Where is the waste? 10:15:26 Monero's mining algorithm is designed to be efficient on a general-purpose CPU thanks to random code generation and the requirement of low-latency L1, L2 and L3 caches as well as fast RAM. CPUs are the most energy-efficient hardware for mining Monero. 10:16:40 "Monero follows Satoshi's..." <- make sense , but why would small cpu participate it's impossible for them to win a block 10:17:16 It's not impossible, it's very unlikely. This is why P2Pool was created. Small miners can get regular payout thanks to P2Pool. 10:17:39 xfedex[m]: ohh so cpu is the ASIC for for monero algorithm.. 10:18:36 mlcboss[m]: if you think "small" cpu is impossible to participate in the mining, wait till you see the incentives present in the ASIC-mined coins... Afaik, your old computer can get a 1k H/s while the best CPU today gets a 100k H/s? So, the imbalance is 100 to 1 between the best and the worst, lets say. With bitcoin, your regular cpu or gpu is millions times behind the specialized asics. 10:19:16 xfedex[m]: Also this. Thank sech1 for p2pool. 10:21:29 xfedex[m]: what is the benefit of using p2pool than mine the block yourself? 10:21:29 small miners make sense but the reward will be small right if they mine with their own personal computers? 10:22:16 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> what is the benefit of using p2pool than mine the block yourself? 10:22:16 > 10:22:16 > small miners make sense but the reward will be small right if they mine with their own personal computers? 10:22:16 benefit of using p2pool is having regular payments. With mining solo, you get payouts less regularly (depending on your mining rig). 10:22:26 i don't even bother running a small mining operation that earns me nothing or negative cause you need to pay electricity 10:23:26 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> what is the benefit of using p2pool than mine the block yourself? 10:23:27 > 10:23:27 > small miners make sense but the reward will be small right if they mine with their own personal computers? 10:23:27 Without P2Pool, if you are a small miner with 1 computer, it might take months or even years to find a block. With P2Pool even small miners get regular payouts. 10:23:40 k4r4b3y[m]: what is the catch of p2pool , the reason i avoid mining pool cause of the fee 10:23:40 im fine waiting 2-3 months for payout 10:24:02 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> what is the catch of p2pool , the reason i avoid mining pool cause of the fee 10:24:02 > 10:24:02 > im fine waiting 2-3 months for payout 10:24:02 p2pool also doesn't have pool-fees, you do not pay a cut of your earnings to the pool operator. 10:24:22 point of p2pool is there is NO centralized pool operator. 10:24:46 catch of p2pool might be having a more complicated setup for mining. But gupax.io makes that setup quite automated and easy. 10:25:15 is p2pool only in monero blockchain cause i never heard of it in other coins 10:25:36 mlcboss[m]: btc also had one. But they didn't care for it. And now it is abandoned. 10:25:56 Monero should learn from btc's mistakes. 10:26:38 lol 10:26:56 btc didbt adopt p2pool for good reason 10:27:03 didnt* 10:27:11 ofrnxmr[m]: and that is? 10:27:43 until very recently, p2pool was bith expensive and privack harming to other users 10:28:05 and blockchain bloating 10:28:25 ofrnxmr[m]: I get the privacy harming part, but what about the p2pool on xmr was harming other users' privacy? 10:28:31 sorry, I meant, making it expensive for others? 10:28:50 p2pool spams low quality coinbase outouts 10:29:10 monero seem the most unique PoW coin 10:29:10 designed an algorithm that will be efficient on a CPU 10:29:10 peer to peer pool 10:29:12 1 coinbase output becames 400 10:29:29 i has 2 400+ output ribg members in mybtx yesterday 10:29:38 okay, and you say that pushes the fees of transaction up? 10:29:55 I thought that's why we have dynamic blocksizes 10:30:24 ofrnxmr[m]: gov blocked cex for no reason lmao , even binance is blocked 10:30:24 forcing to use local cex cause taxes 🤑 10:30:27 the user who get oaid these has to spend 2-5+% to consolidate 10:30:49 ofrnxmr[m]: but the user himself is also the miner.. 10:31:05 460 out on a coinbase is literally 3 full blocks when consolidated 10:31:12 ofrnxmr[m]: so if i want a good privacy is better to solo mine? 10:31:12 and like i mentioned i have to wait 2-4 months to get reward which im fine with it 10:31:40 solo is best privacy, and doesnt hurt anyone elses 10:32:04 there is a pr by jeffro to fix the issue as well 10:32:11 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> so if i want a good privacy is better to solo mine? 10:32:11 > 10:32:11 > and like i mentioned i have to wait 2-4 months to get reward which im fine with it 10:32:11 solo mining is a game of quality equipment. I think monero-gui wallet shows you your changes of hitting block in a given timeframe. Try and see if you are OK with that timeline. 10:32:30 (fix = stop includingcoinbase outputs as ring members* 10:32:45 no. 10:32:50 ofrnxmr I am not getting how p2pool on xmr makes transactions more expensive for others 10:33:02 dont just look at your potential 100% diffucukty 10:33:25 go look at the hashrate of who found the last 100 blocks 10:34:02 a lot of people who "i wont solo becaust it will take 3 years" are donating their blocjs to large miners 10:34:15 ofrnxmr[m]: wut 10:34:29 of course a large portion are from the large miners 10:34:47 ofrnxmr[m]: is there a github discussion thread about this? I am not sure if this is a good solution. 10:34:56 yes 10:35:01 there are 2 10:35:06 108 and 109 10:35:16 k4r4b3y[m]: youre crazy 10:35:30 you just spread a bunch of bad info 10:35:51 abd want to comment on how to fux what you dont even understabd 10:35:55 audacious ha 10:37:56 ofrnxmr[m]: lol, I am here to learn brah 10:38:15 https://xmrchain.net/tx/c59f4aefccbd732f300283ae5461702826e4d34031b342d667350b957772e1c2 10:38:15 https://xmrchain.net/tx/7d88f6eda4a353ba30a09cb0bbb24705db6b311bfd7e0306b7a87344959b3c9d 10:38:24 here are two of my own tx 10:38:37 one using the fix, one without 10:39:02 look at my decoys and tell me which ring is better 10:39:35 okay you got in one of your tx two ring members from the coinbase outputs, 10:39:44 but is this a huge deficiency in your tx privacy? 10:41:03 yes 10:41:36 you got a metric for that, or is this a "feel" 10:41:42 2 out tx are the cast majority of every tx youve ever sent 10:41:46 no 10:41:50 its not a feel 10:41:54 its common fkn sebse 10:42:11 wgen do people send 400 out? they dint and cant 10:42:30 if i send you a ring wuth 15 x 400 ours, YOU KNIW IM NOT P2POOL 10:42:54 and can EASILY exclude any coinbase as not the real spend 10:43:18 isn't this problem gonna go away by itself as we increase the ringsize? For example, when the ring size is 128 with seraphis, you might get, what, 2 ring decoys from the p2pool coinbase, but, so what? You still have 100+ other decoys. 10:43:28 AFTER p2pool fuxes, my effective ring size on the tx i posted is around 10 10:44:03 tgats a 35% decrease in anonset 10:44:04 no 10:44:41 it gets worse with txextra, exchange / merchant volume etc 10:44:53 ofrnxmr[m]: what no? what are the odds of having most of your decoys from p2pool coinbase transactions, once the ring size is like 100+ 10:45:14 a 1 in 2 out tx is 1.5kb 10:45:21 it seems like a question of what is the portion of the p2pool coinbase enotes to the total monero enotes. 10:45:51 if i send you xmr and exery decoy us 2.5kn fir a 1 in 2 out, you kniwthose are similar to "internal transsfers" or someone using a servuce 10:45:58 aka, thats nit the trye soebd euther 10:46:30 every sale i ever make in person will be a 2 out 10:47:23 k4r4b3y[m]: 25% at peak iirc 10:48:02 rucknium posted the numbers recently 10:48:05 ofrnxmr[m]: so at ring size 16, you have had at most 4 decoys being from the p2pool 10:48:18 and that was the worst case scenario that could've happened 10:48:21 thats well over 45% if morbinals didnt slow diown or p2pool dudnt hard fork 10:48:30 from p2pool 10:48:36 with 1500 miners lol 10:49:17 After its hardfork on March 18th, p2pool reduced the number of outputs it generates per day by 60% 10:49:32 so it impacts ring decoys less now 10:49:45 a lotless 10:50:06 sech, have you looked at jeffris pr? 10:50:26 it excludes coinbase 10:51:22 "I will combine it with the..." <- https://gist.github.com/Rucknium/67cc9efdf7e43a40c52417611b322d43 10:51:27 the numbers 10:52:05 "jeffro256: freezing to make sure..." <- https://stagenet.xmrchain.net/tx/e075bf7e3ec463e05a9852cc5f7e6ac9e1b3298965533c04747a557b17abec57/1 only coinbase tx 10:53:21 and heres 2 tx, one using normal decoys one ysing jeffros 10:53:21 https://xmrchain.net/tx/c59f4aefccbd732f300283ae5461702826e4d34031b342d667350b957772e1c2 10:53:21 https://xmrchain.net/tx/7d88f6eda4a353ba30a09cb0bbb24705db6b311bfd7e0306b7a87344959b3c9d 10:53:41 I haven't looked into it, and I'm not sure it's what everyone agreed on 10:54:12 its not part 109, that diesnt buikd rinfs fir coinbase 10:54:23 or maybe the ither way around... 10:54:24 ofrnxmr even though in one of your transactions, two decoys came directly from coinbase outs and thus have decreased the crowd your enote was hiding in, is this decrease really impactful to your transaction privacy? I, as an onlooker to the blockchain, still have no idea which address you have paid to, and how much XMR has changed hands.. So, how much of your privacy is at risk here? 10:54:26 the pain of typing on a phone :D 10:54:48 but anyway, thus one just removescoinbase from regular rinfs and gives them theur iwn 10:55:09 sech1: haha. tablet 😅 10:56:51 on lookers dont, but your decoys are cleeaarrrly not fungible 10:57:20 with enough spam, you can kkeep lowering the pricacy 10:57:47 that's true whether there is p2pool and/or mordinals or not 10:58:01 morbinals alone added 25% volume of excludable 2 outs to the chain 10:58:33 coinbase and txextra are the issues, not p2pool and morbs 10:58:52 some of* the issues 11:00:41 p2pool just exposed leaky holes imat the protocol level. p2pool isnt THE problem. its ysing monero as monero is designed 11:01:58 the fact the bad design leaves doors open to invite bloat and privacy reductions, isnt tge faukt of p2pool, serai, morbinals, or even a merchant who consolidates outputs 11:09:32 reasons for the p2pool hardfork also listed here under "why hardfork" https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/1095730/psa_p2pool_network_upgrade_aka_hardfork_on_march/ 11:14:14 where he sats, p2pool at 50% of network = 100000 outputs 11:14:14 100k outputs consolidated is 228 blocks or 68mb 11:16:28 the solution is full membership proofs 11:16:36 lmao 11:17:11 are you fluffy's unicorn? or just feel like stating the obvious 11:18:30 fmp is obviously ideal. but theory and practice matter 11:18:56 living on mars us nice, but its not viable yet 11:19:51 I agree with this: https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/108#issuecomment-1379288635 11:20:05 >it seems better to aim for general solutions to problems. In this case, one general solution to the privacy impacts of consolidation would be a global membership proof. 11:21:33 and even after global membership proofs, monero will need constant high volume use. Privacy loves company, and if the majority of the activity comes from p2pool or some specific project related enotes, then, even if we have full membership proofs, the crowd one hides in shrinks. 11:22:00 smh 11:22:01 ill be back in a week when you stop preaching to the choir 11:22:35 have you seen zcash? 11:22:55 yeah, I'm thinking jumping ship 11:23:09 xmr is broken by design /s 11:23:19 zcash doesnt work 11:23:22 why would we adopt software that doesnt work at lower scales than out short term projections? 11:23:35 k4r4b3y[m]: hehehe 11:23:46 zcash is broken by design 11:24:10 moneo, i hope, doesnt adopt broken software while its still broken 11:24:35 ofrnxmr[m]: to be specific, which broken software are you referencing at? 11:24:41 is monero need to mix transaction so that's why i have to wait 10 blocks to spend the coin i receive? 11:24:46 fmp 11:24:52 mlcboss[m]: yes 11:25:06 a reorg can invalidate your ring members 11:25:14 ofrnxmr[m]: how is this broken? Afaik there is no monero specific implementation yet? 11:25:20 so 10 block lock to prevent those types of attacks 11:25:29 k4r4b3y[m]: bitinfocharts 11:25:41 look at zcash block size vs tx count 11:25:46 thats just from z to z adddress spam 11:25:58 ofrnxmr[m]: yeah you are talking about zec's broken tx fee model, right? 11:26:03 but that is not related to fmp? 11:26:03 doesnt scale provate tx 11:26:09 no 11:26:18 do i need to wait 20 mins to accept payment? 11:26:20 im talking abiut it lite$ally is infeasibke 11:26:30 mlcboss[m]: no you don't 11:26:38 monero private tx vokume on zcash = rip nodes_ wallets and everything in between 11:26:38 or if it show in my wallet it's mean is already process? 11:26:48 it just i can't spend it yet 11:27:02 right 11:27:09 ofrnxmr I still don't get what you are talking about 11:27:23 because you havent dyor 11:27:26 can you stop talking in riddles, take a deep breath, and speak in full sentences? 11:27:33 no lol 11:27:42 next week when im back on my main device 11:27:50 alrighty 11:27:56 this week im pissing myself off with incomplete sentences 11:28:09 enjoy yourself 11:28:42 and thrres no riddle in "use your eyes and stop just listening to the news" 11:28:53 lot of noise. blockchains dont lie 11:29:37 all it takes is one to analysis the metrics to see whats broken 11:30:00 tldr. private tx on zcash almost solanad it 11:30:09 I'll wait next week for you to explain in depth 11:30:15 ty 11:30:42 btw is the explosive blockchain growth still going on in zec or nah? 11:30:53 yeah 11:31:00 oh nice 11:31:45 https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-xmr-zec.html#1y 11:31:54 monero vs zec blocksize 11:32:19 notice how zec was always tiny before 11:32:53 https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-xmr-zec.html#1y 11:33:03 and has been doing less tx than monero the entire time 11:33:54 ofrnxmr[m]: yeah 11:33:59 thats from pre zaddress usage 11:34:20 is it ok to use HDD for a node? 11:34:20 i plan to get a 500gb HDD , just incase in the future when xmr got really popular 11:34:40 a smallnotice how txvolume now and a year ago is very similar, but blocksize is multiples larger 11:35:11 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> is it ok to use HDD for a node? 11:35:11 > 11:35:11 > i plan to get a 500gb HDD , just incase in the future when xmr got really popular 11:35:11 ssd 11:35:12 hdd no good long term without special setups 11:35:16 ofrnxmr[m]: how can I see blockchain size graph in that website? couldn't find it 11:36:09 shoukd be that direct link(?) 11:36:21 it shows the block size 11:36:32 I would like to see the total blockchain size 11:36:38 oh blockchain size 11:38:41 https://blockchair.com/zcash/charts/blockchain-size 11:39:37 zcash have taxes wtf , why there is people still believing in this coin 11:40:56 ofrnxmr[m]: lovely, aint she? 11:41:26 ofrnxmr[m]: that lift-off lol 11:41:46 Coming up on a year. Time flies. 11:42:01 888tNkZrPN6JsEgekjMnABU4TBzc2Dt29EPAvkRxbANsAnjyPbb3iQ1YBRk1UXcdRsiKc9dhwMVgN5S9cQUiyoogDavup3H 11:42:01 do you guys recognized this address? 11:42:25 no 11:42:25 General fund donation address. 11:42:35 ah, haha 11:42:56 spackle_xmr[m]: crazy 11:43:10 a whole year and barely anything done abiut it 11:43:53 we should accelerate 11:43:55 pretty sure their wallet scene is still atrocious (a lot dont work properly) azcash pays out a lot of money to these devs 11:44:14 spackle_xmr[m]: i don't get it how monero development work 11:44:14 is there like multiple teams & organization working on it 11:44:14 or only a single team cause its the only donation address i found for monero dev 11:44:29 like nighhawk wanted 50k for an explorer, but the wallet didnt work lol 11:44:55 generalfund isnt donating to any specific dev 11:45:09 ofrnxmr[m]: lol that was the only wallet from zec-o-sphere that caught my attention 11:45:11 if you want to donate to devs directly, donate to their funding oroposaks 11:45:15 devs are independent 11:46:20 general fund is run by core team and supports dev proposals, but also manages the costs of some backend stuff 11:46:24 plan to donate 10% of my reward to monero dev 11:46:24 without them monero is nothing 11:46:33 also zcash got spammed? 11:46:56 monero development works like > person does work either for free or for d(nations 11:47:09 mlcboss: Here's the place to watch if you want to support specific developer efforts: ccs.getmonero.org/ 11:47:10 nobody is a perm hire etc 11:47:26 genrral fund may never donate to devs %hat dont open a ccs 11:47:39 donate you money wherever you feel is the best fit 11:47:55 watch ccs proposals if you have specific devs or features etc that you want to support 11:49:05 even if proposals dont go through, you can still supoort the devs 11:49:18 there was an undertaking of writing another monerod implementation in rust. anyone keeping tabs on that? 11:50:00 few months til somethibg something 11:50:26 i think will likely be libs that make iintrgrations easier 11:50:36 not ne they can join forces with molly team, I guess. 11:51:56 molly is also doing their monero libs in rust, afaik 13:01:24 k4r4b3y: ill just say wrong things and wait to be corrected seems to be working for you https://github.com/mollyim/monero-wallet-sdk 13:01:58 plowsof11: yeah I am pretty good at it 13:05:07 k4r4b3y: There have been multiple, none with progress. 13:06:58 That's Kotlin code around wallet2, supposedly, yet I can't find the wallet2 inclusion... 13:09:50 "Monerujo <-> JNI bridge <-> wallet2" 13:10:06 "Molly <-> SDK client <-> SDK service <-> JNI bridge <-> wallet2" 13:11:53 "only low-level functions of wallet2 are called" .. "app is responsible for managing the wallet files" .. "wallet2's handling of wallet state files and file encryption is one of its major flaws" in molly "the wallet data and keys are simply represented as byte arrays, and the app is tasked with securing the storage (files, database...) and encrypting the data" 13:12:06 Ah, submodule under vendor/ 13:12:36 plowsof @plowsof:matrix.org: Where's that last message from? 13:12:54 the developer @vall... valldrac who isnt here 13:13:52 *where* 13:13:53 Not who 13:14:05 I knew it would be valldrac :p 13:14:16 chatgbt 13:16:26 fuggg :D 13:17:47 if you want to dismantle it or something ill ask for it to be posted in a public place? 13:26:20 ... wait, were those messages chatgpt? 13:26:22 was that from no wallet left behind? i recall reading that or simikar somewhere 13:26:27 > wallet2's handling of wallet state files and file encryption is one of its major flaws 13:26:38 is really not its prose. Would be shocked if those messages were. 13:27:06 I solely want to know where that specific message is originally from. ofrn is suggesting NWLB 13:29:20 plowsof @plowsof:matrix.org: do you remember where? 13:31:44 ""Monerujo <-> JNI bridge..." <- i swear i read this in public 13:31:55 ill ask valldrac when he's around to confirm (ideally for the next NWLB meeting/github) 13:33:30 maybe just my psychic acting on its own again 🤔 14:04:16 sech1: I agree with you that excluding coinbase outputs from decoy selection hasn't reached dev/community consensus yet. When I asked in an MRL meeting a few months back about "where do we go from here?" after I made my analysis, I didn't get a response. 14:04:45 It doesn't help that there hasn't been a -dev meeting since the August 2022 hard fork. 14:06:41 what drawback? i see none 14:06:54 s/drawback/drawbacks/ 14:08:41 its a common sense move and considering decoy selection isnt consensus, i already run the fixes and enjoy my enhanced privacy. 14:08:41 you could say that my rings look different, but still better than low quality anonsets 14:10:21 what about having "different puddles" of enotes as a result of this exclusion? that seems to complicate stuff 14:10:33 coinbase vs non? 14:10:50 ye 14:11:14 what about it? coinbase arent private, theyre polution 14:12:13 im in favor of going further and not add a coinbase tx type that only self spends with nodecoys 14:12:25 coinbase arent decoys 14:12:30 they are coinbsse 14:13:02 a decoy has to look like... a decoy.. not an obvious not the real tx 14:13:12 what happens to the coinbase transactions after they are created? user has to turn those into regular enotes? 14:13:41 There can't be a self-sustaining puddle. When coinbases are spent (just once), they enter the non-coinbase pool 14:13:48 hi valldrac ! 14:13:58 Users should spend to themselves 14:14:22 what ruck said ^ 14:14:56 P2Pool payouts have low privacy since the payout addresses are in plaintext on the P2Pool sidechain. Any adversary could record that data. Centralized pool outputs are announced by the centralized pools 14:16:11 Privacy analysis: https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/109 14:16:22 yeah I saw that 14:16:26 the current pr only cleans up non coinbase rings 14:16:26 the next issue is where im in favor of coinbase only bameing self spendable using sweep_coinbase sweep_single_coinbase that would churn to the users wallet 14:16:40 being** 14:16:56 interesting idea 14:17:11 those coinbase NOT use ringson thesweep 14:19:11 Thanks Rucknium, i was looking for the 'effective ring size' graph earlier , and i see its in the 109 issue 14:19:22 currently coinbase polute anonset 14:19:22 jeffro pr changes so coinbase use coinbase for decoys, andreg tx use reg tx 14:19:22 further step would be for cb to not use decoys, self spend only, thereby making coinbase consolidations ~90% space savings and no privacy harm 14:19:28 i was looking on rucknium.me and couldnt find it 14:19:45 shilled^^^^ 14:20:58 ofrnxmr this PR, right? https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/8815 14:21:23 i believe so 14:22:53 yes that is it 14:23:14 im runningand using it on mainnet 14:25:54 "P2Pool payouts have low privacy..." <- and further, true solo miners are unknown offchain 14:29:11 i seen 1Ghash a second randomly appear last week on hashvault (to the person who said the big boys cant just turn up) 14:32:17 yeah lmso 14:32:41 fkn asshole had my node lagging for a few mins 14:33:13 imagine if hetzner said 'keep your trash nodes off our network or we'll 51% attack your coin.. youve got until next month" 14:33:23 i thought maybe today too but havent checked 14:33:37 plowsof11: lmao 14:33:52 they just take over your D miners 14:33:56 and* 14:34:00 1cpu1vote, ill be donating 200h/s to the effort 14:34:33 i got my wow block reorgd 💢 14:38:55 plowsof11: hey, bitcoiners have their "you should be able to run a node on muh raspi" obsession, and we have ours "you should be able to mine on muh raspi" obsession. 🤷‍♂️ 14:40:40 huh 14:41:05 rasp for xmr is... self mutilation 14:41:22 rock - ok. rasp - just why 14:41:58 i use android 🤷‍♂️ 14:47:36 is there a good full guide to start solo mining monero? 14:47:36 getmonero.org is not much of a help 14:48:17 any mining pool has basic setup instructions 14:48:26 there are different typesof mining 14:48:46 pool 14:48:46 solo 14:48:46 p2pool 14:49:33 i will do it tommorow i have to update my OS , Win7 not supported 14:49:50 Monero-gui doesn't support 32bit 14:50:01 Full guide to solo mining is to type "start_mining
" into monerod 14:50:11 Or use xmrig 14:50:25 i probably should get more ram to run win11 14:51:26 use linux 14:51:36 i can't use linux 14:51:45 unless you like to be confused when windows breaks your miner or node 14:51:55 you can, why xant ya? 14:52:57 isn't Windows more stable? 14:53:12 Linux usually gives you more hashrate 14:53:20 can even install linux on a flash or external drive etc. i cant be bothered with windows issues like "hey, why is ny clipboard showinf a different address" 14:53:27 cant even protrct you from viruses 14:53:47 but will delete YOUR zpurposely downloaded, verifuable xmrig 14:54:03 xfedex[m]: ok i will install it , OS really matters huh 14:54:16 Yes, because windows is super bloated 14:54:43 its actully very aimilar, with a slight edge to windows due to more easily available tuning tools 14:55:27 but imo negligible, i care abiut hash per watt, not max hash 14:56:01 ofrnxmr: on my device I get ~20%+ hashrate on Linux, perhaps because Windows threads suck (i have a cpu with virtual cores) 14:56:23 i go to linux.org , distribution shouldn't matter right? 14:56:23 i will pick Ubuntu cause is in the top 14:56:30 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> i go to linux.org , distribution shouldn't matter right? 14:56:30 > 14:56:30 > i will pick Ubuntu cause is in the top 14:56:30 Don't pick ubuntu 14:56:51 ubuntu is fine for new users 14:56:57 Ubuntu is popular, but Canonical, the company behind it, has made some bad decisions recently. Go with Linux Mint. 14:57:17 askiiart[m]: ok i will pick the second option , CentOS 14:57:25 shitty snapapps etc but easy installation and best copatibility 14:57:27 mlcboss[m]: nono 14:57:28 Ubuntu is in practice a clone of Debian, with more stuff pre-installed. For me it's fine. I'd prefer Kubuntu tho, it's Ubuntu with KDE Plasma (a cooler and more lightweight desktop environment) 14:57:50 Linux Mint lighter, based on Ubuntu (so all the tutorials and stuff work), and has a closer interface to Windows. 14:57:56 https://linuxmint.org/download.php 14:58:11 linuxmint is ok 14:58:11 s/org/com/ 14:58:12 but not easy updrage 14:58:15 too many choices, I think I'll just stick with windows 14:58:23 ubuntu can be painkess for "just use it" 14:59:00 ceetee[m]: is it even that matters 14:59:12 Ubuntu/Kubuntu is just fine 14:59:24 KDE is goated 14:59:27 askiiart[m]: ok i will pick linux mint 14:59:35 agreed on ubuntu and kubuntu 14:59:47 linux mint is LITERALLY an ubuntu fork 15:00:18 but with some easy of use additions, a ux nit as good as kde, and not great upgrade patb 15:00:32 i run both 15:00:38 i prefer fedora 15:00:48 cinnamon , mate , xfce doesn't matter right? 15:00:48 it seem is just a different texture pack 15:00:48 i pick cinnamon cause is in the top 15:01:10 cinnamon mate and xfce are all not grest 15:01:11 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> cinnamon , mate , xfce doesn't matter right?... (full message at ) 15:01:15 xfce for old school guys 15:01:24 cinnamon for windows 7 guys 15:01:29 mate for xp guys 15:01:37 kubuntu for windows 11 guyz 15:01:48 Most accurate comparisons I've ever heard 15:01:53 gnome for linux ppl that dont care abiut windows workflow 15:02:13 ofrnxmr[m]: Kinda Windows 11 interface but not user-hostile 15:02:22 gnome is also granny friendly, so not preferred by hardcore folks 15:02:29 askiiart[m]: yeah 15:02:54 The icons are probably closer to Windows 11, though 15:03:07 kubuntu is nice imo. 15:03:07 but im a gnome shell +extensions fan 15:03:31 I ditched gnome when they released major 3 a long time ago 15:03:40 look the ux is doesn't matter , linux is linux 15:03:56 yeah, i gotused to the superkey launcher though 15:04:16 super easy to use. but some defaults are dumb, so extensions 15:04:45 like tiling, side dock, restore session, kdeconnect, dropdown terminal 15:05:48 KDE connect is good af 15:05:52 i used cinnamon for a while when gnome 3 was real weird 15:06:15 I also use KDE Connect lol 15:06:36 kdeconnect is super undderrated 15:06:41 I did try Cinnamon, Mate, even used Trinity for a while 😂 15:06:58 Now using Plasma and XFCE (depending of the machine) 15:07:10 internet doesn't matter right? i basically just sending hash 15:07:10 cause my internet is less than 50mbps 15:07:30 50MB is plenty 15:07:31 50mbps is a lot 15:07:44 you can mine with less than 1 mbps 15:07:57 tldr. use kubuntu 15:08:42 kubuntu = ubuntu + KDE desktop 15:09:02 i don't get Linux user obsession on computer texture pack 15:09:12 its not a texture pack 15:09:16 mlcboss: So uh fair warning: The fighting over which Linux distro is better is absolutely constant. 15:09:18 its an entire environment 15:09:26 the apps etc 15:09:33 Been a long time I did not use Ubuntu. 15:10:10 The actual term is "Desktop Environment" 15:10:10 mlcboss[m]: Are you a minecraft player? 15:10:10 the underlying os is largely irrellevent to the user interfsce 15:10:10 what changes is the rxperienxe 15:10:10 mlcboss[m]: Yeah, on Linux you get to chose you're desktop environment instead of having one been forced down you're throat) 15:10:11 So like with GNOME by default you get the Nautilus file manager, the GNOME desktop, the GNOME terminal, etc 15:10:26 if you arenew tolinux,useubuntu. why? everythinf works ans has docs 15:10:49 I have to give a new test run to Enlightenment, I use to like it a long time ago 15:10:50 askiiart[m]: But Linux is free (in beer and speech), so if you don't like the terminal, for example, you could install Kitty instead 15:10:51 like, if you try to build monero, its easier to find ubuntu guides than anything else 15:11:02 and those guide will teach you how to do it on otber distros 15:11:06 ofrnxmr[m]: noted 15:11:15 monero gui is only on PC? 15:11:33 mlcboss[m]: wdym? I'm running the Monero wallet on Linux right now 15:11:37 they should release on mobile tbh , cause you can do payment anywhere easily 15:11:43 If you want to build monero, so easier on Gentoo 15:11:43 All the dependencies and dev crust are already installed :p 15:11:51 * Monero wallet GUI on Linux 15:12:25 there are mobile wallets, just not the official GUI wallet 15:12:47 ceetee[m]: I use Monerujo, it's pretty good 15:12:51 But yeah, Ubuntu have a big community of people documenting it. 15:12:51 So is Arch Linux 15:13:13 > <@gfdshygti53:monero.social> But yeah, Ubuntu have a big community of people documenting it. 15:13:13 > So is Arch Linux 15:13:13 Arch is *extreme* modularity, I wouldn't recommend it for beginners, but it has fantastic docs 15:13:24 arch wiki is amazing, arch is not so simple 15:13:41 arch wiki has all the answers when tou cant find elsewhere thiugh 15:13:51 ar least, will lead you down the right path 15:14:09 I hate to interrupt, but can someone help me with XMRig? I'm running xmrig-md, and I'm getting `FAILED TO APPLY MSR MOD, HASHRATE WILL BE LOW`. 15:14:09 Under CPU it says `11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-11300H @ 3.10GHz (1) 64-bit AES`, not a VM CPU, and I'm also running it as root. 15:14:14 startas admin 15:14:17 YEah, even to fix Gentoo or other, often endup using the Arch doc 15:14:24 xfedex[m]: i stopped 5 years ago after mojang stop supporting PS3 15:14:24 it was my first game btw 15:14:25 And adjust 15:14:35 ofrnxmr[m]: admin = root 15:14:43 > <@askiiart:plantsfarmus.duckdns.org> I hate to interrupt, but can someone help me with XMRig? I'm running xmrig-md, and I'm getting `FAILED TO APPLY MSR MOD, HASHRATE WILL BE LOW`. 15:14:43 > Under CPU it says `11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-11300H @ 3.10GHz (1) 64-bit AES`, not a VM CPU, and I'm also running it as root. 15:14:43 start as admin 15:14:49 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> i stopped 5 years ago after mojang stop supporting PS3 15:14:49 > 15:14:49 > it was my first game btw 15:14:49 Hehe, the term "texture pack" clearly comes from minecraft :) 15:14:57 yeah 15:14:57 sudo 15:15:22 apt in an example of "why ubuntu" 15:15:40 a lot of install instructions dont even list packages for non debian 15:15:58 ofrnxmr[m]: Do you not know the most basic function of sudo, or can you not read? 15:16:12 hah? 15:16:26 are you asking qs or me? 15:16:37 run it as admin / sudo 15:16:41 stfu and report back 15:16:43 ofrnxmr[m]: sudo runs whatever you're doing as root. I already said I'm running as root in my original message. 15:16:47 ofrnxmr[m]: He already said "and I'm also running it as root." 15:16:58 well what os 15:17:00 ceetee[m]: can't find any open source wallet on f-droid 15:17:13 askiiart[m]: You running on a hypervisor or something? 15:17:20 mlcboss[m]: Add the monerujo repo to F-Droid 15:17:22 monerujo.io 15:17:28 mlcboss[m]: monerujo is open source and also on fdroid i think 15:17:29 lol @rav 15:17:30 RavFX[m]: Nope, I'm on bare metal 15:17:39 and whatos 15:17:44 same convo 15:17:49 mlcboss[m]: monerujo and stack wallet habe a repo each that you can add to the fdroid app 15:17:52 ofrnxmr[m]: Fedora 37 15:18:18 mlcboss: https://f-droid.monerujo.io/ 15:18:25 check xmrig docs and see if fedora neesa manuak xonfig 15:18:26 sech1: 15:18:42 (same xonvo @rav - ubuntu for compat) 15:18:43 local monero isn't wallet right? and local monero is a company that hold my funds? 15:18:54 yes, not a wallet 15:19:16 Bridgerton? 15:19:17 Hey, welcome back buddy :) 15:19:43 askiiart[m]: thanks 15:19:51 cake wallet, monero.com (stable) 15:19:51 monerujo (buggy sometimes), stack wallet (beta) 15:21:13 specifically monerujo likes to corruot wallets (randomly) and stack has ghosts that pop up as soon as i think its good 15:21:22 Stack Wallet is also nice 15:21:39 ofrnxmr[m]: Ghosts? 15:21:42 for light use any app is fine 15:21:57 my stack jssue atm is that restoring a backup seems to .. mess somehying up 15:22:02 never had problems with monerujo or stack 15:22:09 i will pick monerujo because open source and less taking my space 15:22:11 wallets dont sync reliablt anymore 15:22:16 ofrnxmr[m]: Nope, just run as root it says. I downloaded the script that actually does that, and it outputted this:... (full message at ) 15:22:22 moneujo has had the corruption issie forever 15:22:36 but i experieced ir for myself like4xbefore i believed kr 15:22:39 > <@askiiart:plantsfarmus.duckdns.org> Nope, just run as root it says. I downloaded the script that actually does that, and it outputted this:... (full message at ) 15:22:54 it basicallt logs you out, says wrong password and wont let you back in 15:23:18 is there some benchmarking to find my gpu/cpu hash rate ? 15:23:23 > <@askiiart:plantsfarmus.duckdns.org> Nope, just run as root it says. I downloaded the script that actually does that, and it outputted this:... (full message at ) 15:23:27 askiiart[m]: there are docs to set manuallt 15:23:29 > <@askiiart:plantsfarmus.duckdns.org> Nope, just run as root it says. I downloaded the script that actually does that, and it outputted this:... (full message at ) 15:24:15 > <@gfdshygti53:monero.social> msr kernel module loaded? 15:24:15 > Because should work if you are in root. Or maybe it's some security policies 15:24:15 Yeah, I've got the kernel module loaded, like I said above, gonna try disabling secure boot, brb 15:24:26 stradman: you can just mine some xmr or run the xmrig.com/benchmark 15:25:10 mine aome xmr= download xmrig, a wallet, go to a mining pool and run xmrig with your wallet addresand pool address 15:25:58 or go to that website 15:26:01 some resource of step by step guides from ground up ? 15:26:08 and search for your cpu 15:26:33 other people have likely already benchmarked it 15:26:34 This is RandomX algo right ? 15:26:43 yea 15:26:56 Nice ! 15:27:10 I see my model has around 1.8KH/s 15:27:15 can we talk about other coin or no? 15:27:15 is Ethereum now centralized , i kinda worried about EF seem they are controlled by venture capitalist & exchanges 15:27:15 proof of stake benefits them the most 15:27:31 #monero-offtopic:monero.social for eth 15:28:12 brain rot talking about wet water 15:29:51 "> <@askiiart:plantsfarmus...." <- Update: yeah, it was secure boot 15:30:25 like "didya know that when you cut grass its actually shorter after? lets talk abiut this phenomenon"😆😆 *eth is just 1 letter short of traitor 15:30:37 askiiart[m]: good to know 15:30:47 How much can I get in monero in 2KH/s ? 15:31:06 depends whatyour goals are 15:31:24 getting some monero :), don't want payout 15:31:30 are you trying to makemoney withthat? not happening 15:31:45 some monero monero.herominers.com 15:31:47 no not monwy 15:31:51 stradman: According to coinwarz's calculator, 0.00033908 XMR per day 15:31:51 thrres a calc at the bottom 15:32:25 i mine simply to accumulate xmr 15:32:37 that's my intentions too 15:32:44 Do I need fast internet too ? 15:32:47 i pay out of pocket 15:32:56 converting the surplus of electricity into more XMR accumulation 15:33:03 stradman: not necessarily. you want good latency 15:33:11 i don't get the hype for proof of stake , some or planned pow coins migration to proof of stake 15:33:11 its literally printing money with air , plus only venture capitalist & exchanges has the power to do that 15:33:30 its just federal reserve 2.0 next question 15:33:32 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> i don't get the hype for proof of stake , some or planned pow coins migration to proof of stake 15:33:32 > 15:33:32 > its literally printing money with air , plus only venture capitalist & exchanges has the power to do that 15:33:32 It's just a Proof of Scam, please ignore! 15:33:51 where is the calculator ofrnxmr[m] ? 15:33:58 is not possible right for monero to change it's protocol? 15:34:06 *consensus 15:34:12 stradman: very bottom 15:34:56 "estimate mining profits" 15:35:23 I see 1.58 bucks monthly, not bad eh 15:36:35 Now should I buy monero or wownero (fork of monero )? 15:37:26 stradman: monero , more utilities for it and more demand for it 15:37:26 more liquid market also 15:37:49 Can I use it for donations ? 15:38:10 yes 15:39:06 stradman: monero is accept as donations more than wownero 15:39:06 just don't put money on random forks unless you like having fun burning money 15:39:21 wownero isnt rsndom 15:39:27 but its also not serious 15:39:51 so it doesnt hurt to have $20of wow 15:40:07 but dont expect it to somehow replwce xmr 15:40:47 So let's mine monero first and then we can dive into wow, same mining software ? 15:41:18 same miner yer 15:41:35 it the same as bitcoin gold or random bitcoin forks will replacing bitcoin 15:41:35 is just for folks who aren't serious with their money and having fun burning money on random coins 15:41:53 its just for xmr folks to mess around eitg blockchain 15:41:56 Why burning money, electricity ? 15:42:11 and not really worry about lost seeds or bugs 15:42:50 but from a laptop i guess you can't burn a lot of electricity, right ? 15:43:03 stradman: is up to you bud , if you love wasting money and electricity to have wownero 15:43:23 where is the wasting money coming from ? 15:43:30 not much mkre than gaming 15:43:32 and its not mining for nothinf 15:44:09 so I start at getmonero.org right ? 15:44:11 shitcoin mining can be wastinf moner 15:44:13 stradman: buying them , paying for electricity , paying for mining hardware 15:44:47 getmonero.org for the desktop software for a wallet, node and p2pool 15:44:58 xmrig.com if you dont need a desktop wallet or node or p2pool 15:44:59 use the hardware you own, that way the hardware is virtually free 15:45:03 I am not gonna buy them, I mine at my laptop, no special hardware and how much electricity can a laptop take, less than a freezer anyhow 15:45:37 ofrnxmr[m] : would I do without a wallet ? 15:45:44 heat is the biggest issue with laptop mining 15:45:48 move between the tropics and convert to solar > No more relying on the state for power and ton of surplus to "burn" 15:46:00 put laptop in freezer, keeps it cool 15:46:16 lol 15:46:30 stradman: i have eveey wallet installed,but i typicalky use mobile wallet for everything 15:46:44 I put dry ice on the laptop vents, no liquid damage then 15:46:51 nice 15:47:08 you dont need a desktoo wallet to mine, all you need is a wallet address and xmrig 15:47:25 so I can get myself a mobile wallet too ? 15:47:25 stradman: Fill you're living room with carbon monoxide :D 15:47:38 yup 15:47:51 it stays on floor, np 15:48:07 I can't find CO anywhere apart from the garage 15:48:18 go step 1: do you want to run a node? 15:48:21 wait, you mean CO2 15:48:23 so* 15:48:31 umm, node ? 15:48:46 you mean not a part of pool 15:48:59 if yes, do you also want to run the officiak desktop wallet? 15:49:29 nide = store w copy of the blockchain and verify blocks (60-160gb) 15:49:38 store a* 15:49:52 stradman: if it's an old laptop ok , i suggest dont mine it on your personal computer 15:49:52 especially if you want to mine long enough on a laptop , the heat is bad for your laptop 15:50:23 God, it requires so much storage ? 15:50:42 the entire blovkchain does, yes 15:50:44 it's only ~160GB 15:50:50 but you dont need it 15:50:55 thank god 15:50:57 RavFX[m]: 60gb pruned 15:51:39 when was the change to randomX brought ? 15:52:48 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> I wonder why monero PoW uses CPU instead of GPU... (full message at ) 15:55:03 n uhm. asic = [a]pplication [s]pecific [i]ntegrated [c]ircuit , not analog circuit dedicated etc 15:55:04 what mobile wallet can I get ? 15:55:30 cake and monero.com are my top rec right now 15:55:33 For monero? 15:55:40 yeah monero 15:56:07 monerujo #2 15:56:07 and stack pending #2-1 after its reliable 15:56:26 I’d prolly say cake tbh 15:56:58 Monerujo 15:57:01 luna24[m]: i believed elon start pumping doge before twitter 15:57:01 doge it the second PoW coin 15:57:01 Ethereum has moves to PoS and doge planned to be PoS too 15:57:03 Is a good one as well 15:57:15 cake and monero.com are the same bte. monero.com doesnt include btc, haven, ltc etc. dotcom is moneo only 15:57:46 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> i believed elon start pumping doge before twitter... (full message at ) 15:57:59 doge is a real coin 15:58:19 and is almost as decentralized as ltc 15:58:41 Ether has been “moving to PoS” for like 6 years now and you still can’t unstake coins. Some people have had there coins stuck being staked to the chain since 2021 15:58:56 Ltc is a shitty alt btc 15:59:05 2021-present does feel like 6 years doesnt it? 15:59:13 meeting time. fast one 15:59:23 Doge moving to PoS will kill the network 15:59:23 boom 15:59:28 luna24[m]: still works better than btc 15:59:37 pos is a pos 15:59:47 ofrnxmr[m]: Was using it as an example from when PoS for eth was proposed to beginning to be added 16:00:02 ofrnxmr[m]: Legit anything is better then btc 16:00:28 and literally downloading and running xmrig is all I need to do ? 16:00:34 Btc is only popular cuz it was the first coin and people are too lazy to research into other coins and projects 16:00:52 luna24[m]: no , PoS coins are crap 16:00:52 if it PoS i will not put my money to it 16:00:56 It’s basically impossible to mine now a days anyways with how hard the algorithms have become 16:01:14 stradman: Yuh 16:01:24 wow that's simple ! 16:01:49 > <@mlcboss:matrix.org> no , PoS coins are crap 16:01:50 > 16:01:50 > if it PoS i will not put my money to it 16:01:50 I don’t think all PoS coins are shit, polygon and polkadot are good examples 16:02:24 they literally printing money with air 16:02:35 Polka specifically is a good network to support since it was the first like “official” multichain bridge between networks 16:03:04 mlcboss[m]: So I take it you don’t know how PoS works 💀 16:05:14 https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/proof-of-stake/ 16:05:40 Monero.com by Cake Wallet is a fork of Cake Wallet that only allows you to store XMR on the device, but you can exchange XMR for other assets. What assests ? 16:06:52 luna24[m]: i don't fall into crypto buzzwords 16:09:11 PoS isn’t a buzzword, it’s a consensus model lmao 16:09:37 Solana uses PoH which is rooted on PoS but uses “time” to have faster network speeds 16:09:58 luna24[m]: and yet it flawed 16:09:58 Atm solana has the fastest network with an ungodly amount of transactions a second that it has yet to hit 16:10:18 mlcboss[m]: That’s cuz it’s tryna become ether 16:11:44 Like I said, polygon and polkadot are the best PoS networks imo 16:12:29 Polygon gave us kusama which is the best network for a cheap way for dapp devs to test there shit 16:12:55 And polkadot is the only massive bridge between all networks that helped give us uniswap 🤷🏻‍♂️ 16:13:26 Imo they are both massive players in keeping decentralization afloat next to monero 16:13:33 luna24[m]: consensus model that reward and controlled by venture capitalist & insiders 16:15:09 Hence why PoS doge will kill yeh network with how cheap the coins are 16:15:22 And eth moving PoS is just as bad 16:16:11 Main reason either was even as popular as it was is cuz it brought in NFTs (scams) and it was easy to mine 16:17:33 mlcboss[m]: But nah, you get rewards from transaction fees on the network cuz staking verity’s blocks, 16:17:35 Verifies* 16:25:29 Do I have to join a pool or can go solo ? 16:26:25 stradman: Pool is the way if you have a single miner, if you have a good amount then solo 🤷🏻‍♂️ 16:26:49 single miner as in single client ? 16:26:59 Single rig 16:27:05 1cpu per miner 16:27:10 "Like I said, polygon and..." <- why do you belief on centralized blockchain? 16:27:10 isn't the point of a blockchain should be decentralized? 16:27:10 polygon only has 100 active validators and a blockchain product selled by a company 16:27:42 So since I am mining on laptop, pool is the way to go? 16:27:44 They aren’t centralized lol, 16:29:09 And I didn’t say I believe in polygon, just that it’s a good example of PoS done right since without it we wouldn’t have the best test bench chain, kusama, for dapp devs to utalize since most chains now utalize an EVM 16:29:21 xmrig doesn't allow single mining it seems 16:29:24 Polkadot and monero I believe in atm 16:29:43 stradman: To single mine you can use the gui wallet in advanced mode 16:30:17 desktop wallet ? 16:30:19 Or own your own node to mine to 16:30:20 🤷🏻‍♂️ 16:30:27 Yuh 16:30:50 https://www.getmonero.org/downloads/ 16:30:50 I can't get my own node, 60 gb commitment is too mcuh 16:31:01 😂😂😂 16:31:20 It’s like 160gbs for the full blockchain homie 16:31:32 Just prune it though and you should be good 16:31:56 But on my laptop, I can't mine solo right ? 16:32:06 You can 16:32:27 then why people go to pools ? 16:33:00 Solo mining you are trying to find a block limited by your own hashrate 16:33:17 A pool is the combined power of all rigs 16:33:34 does monero have discord too ? 16:33:39 So it’s found faster, securing the network better, and rewards all workers 16:34:04 stradman: Yuh, but they use bridges to connect them to matrix 16:34:31 what's monero's discord server at ? u have invite link ? 16:35:21 Not atm 16:35:33 If you want more help with mining this is a good group 16:35:35 https://matrix.to/#/%23xmrmine%3Amatrix.org 16:35:41 thx 16:37:28 and for solo mine you need to make that few GBs of space commitment ? 16:37:30 Np 16:38:16 stradman: Yeh, if you can’t store the full chain, then a pruned chain will work 16:38:32 how much space is the pruned chain ? 16:41:41 60GB right now 16:41:49 Don't mine solo unless you have > 200 kH/s 16:42:06 so what's the best pool to go with now ? 16:42:07 Otherwise it will take you years to find anything 16:42:33 stradman: P2pool. You can use a public remote node if you don't want to run your own 16:42:37 I see merope1 16:43:17 Otherwise, pick a mid-sized PPLNS pool from here: https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero 16:43:41 I don't see P2pool in the config maker of xmrig 16:44:07 Like xmrpool.eu or moneroocean 16:44:44 stradman: P2pool is a decentralized pool, you have to download a program to run it 16:45:01 https://p2pool.io/#help 16:45:04 how's herominers.com pool ? 16:46:04 Not familiar with it, or the PROP payout scheme 16:46:43 Gotta go 17:04:10 herominers is no good 17:05:25 nanopool ? 17:05:26 supportxmr, moneroocean, monerohash, monerop, monerod are good 17:06:13 good but id avoid nano, hashvauld and even support xmr, and id use moneroocean or a smaller pool 17:06:53 I like monero ocean when I did mine 17:07:03 I plan on mining using a cluster tho 17:07:06 https://xmrig.com/wizard#pools : I am selecting the pools from here 17:07:28 moneroocean js nice because you can switch to mining a shitcoin if you want to make more xmr 17:07:45 or you can mine xmr directly 17:12:08 Yuh 17:12:28 I plan on turning the ravencoin I mine to xmr lol, 17:13:12 Do I have to specify algorithm while adding moneroocean ? 17:14:27 On the cluster of 5 libre renegade boards I’m making, I’d get around 75MH/s 17:14:57 Which isn’t a lot but mining in a pool with it should be pretty profitable lol 17:15:16 stradman: rx/0 17:15:38 cool 17:16:38 what's tls ? 17:16:41 scratch that 17:16:47 no algo 17:16:56 tls is https (vs htp) 17:17:51 add name of your coin algorithm at the end of miner password field after ~ character, like this: worker_name~k12. The list of supported algorithms can be found at  17:18:42 did I need to give password too ? 17:19:04 so for paffword ou write 17:19:04 nickname~rx/0 17:20:28 and the nickname would be ? 17:20:34 I'm sorry I'm just new to this 17:22:02 * ofrnxmr[m] uploaded an image: (60KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/monero.social/VuMppjslQZrBvIMVfeCwsdyr/tqf3toi75ct0gebg.jpg > 17:22:16 nickname can be whatever you want 17:22:42 example 17:22:42 laptop~rx/0 17:23:42 gr8 17:23:53 enable tld too right ? 17:24:22 *tls 17:26:40 is you enable tls, use 20128 instead of 10128 17:27:27 actually use 20032 or 20064 17:28:02 maybe i'll just leave it alone then 17:28:12 10032 (SSL 20032): 32000 diff (500-1000 h/s) 17:28:12 10064 (SSL 20064): 64000 diff (1000-2000 h/s) 17:28:12 10128 (SSL 20128): 128000 diff (2000-4000 h/s) 17:28:37 thx 17:29:25 https://moneroocean.stream 17:29:50 youll put your address in there to view your status, change payout settings etc 17:30:05 alrightyy 17:30:51 and help > faq has a lot of info 17:31:09 like how to switch to a different coin 17:31:23 (you always get paid in xmr) 17:31:35 that's fine by me 17:38:35 if I quit the client midway, do I lose all progress ? 17:39:10 no, but you want to keep mining for longer than the pplns period 17:39:20 youll keep getting paid after you stop mining 17:39:41 but you are paid depending on your contibution in the time leading up to blocks being found 17:40:22 if no blocks are found in 3 days, you wont get paid. 17:40:22 you paid paid for your average effort 17:40:33 within the "window" of time 17:42:16 the thing is I don't have the minimum payout of 0.03 XMR when i quit, so can quit before pplns period ? 17:47:08 such is the life of pool mining 17:47:30 you cwnt cash out beyond the minimum payment if any pool 17:48:40 yeah, so if i like get 0.01 XMR and quit the client, next time I tart the client, do i start from 0 or 0.01 XMR ? 17:50:29 "Just get a Glock!" But which one should you buy? We cover our pick of the best Glock models across all calibers and sizes.... (full message at ) 17:54:59 #huh? 17:55:14 not sure we have a room for that block of text 17:55:45 Will the client again start from 0 or from where it left off previously like 0.0001XMR ? 17:55:53 "we accept xmr"? 17:56:29 your* 17:56:30 stradman: no, youre accumulated xmr will remain ultil you hit the payout limit (or a limit that you set) 17:56:45 it will pick up where it left off 17:56:59 so it will accumulate at the pool servers right ? 17:57:11 technically kore be.auae you keep getting paid after yiu stop 17:57:18 stradman: right 17:57:32 thats why theyre "centralized" pools 17:57:38 I get it now 17:57:41 they hold the money and the hashrate 17:58:23 mining xmr directly on moneroocean has very low or no fees iirc 17:58:42 help page shou\d show all of that 18:00:45 over 4xmr withdraw is free (ahaha) 18:00:45 less than that with a withdrawal fee (i dont know what it is) 18:02:57 check out monerod.org as well 18:03:15 not sure what their limits are, but no fees 18:05:35 ive personally used moneroocean (everyone knows about moneroocean) but monerod sounds nice too 18:49:05 just going to leave this here... (full message at ) 18:49:50 some crazy people use tor on 18083, zmq on 18084, and i2p on 18085678 #cringe 18:50:20 zmq on 18082 and 18083 18:50:20 anon networks on 18084 and 18085 18:53:10 "check out monerod.org as well" <- That one always seemed pretty sketchy to me 18:53:26 same, but they updated templates as soon as i contacted them 18:53:35 They even have their forked version of xmrig where they redirect the dev fee to their own pool 18:53:50 "how to retrieve hash and..." <- Can someone, with more patience than me, explain how communication with a monerod thingy works? 18:54:05 the dev fee pays for the raffle iirc 18:54:35 TrasherDK[m]: from daemon and not roc? im confused 18:54:40 rpc* 18:55:01 ofrnxmr[m]: Yeah, and no way to actually verify 18:55:01 if youre on the host, i guess you dont need rpc 18:55:45 ofrnxmr[m]: All (non-p2p) communication with the node goes through the rpc port 18:55:52 ive never used tgem, only that ut seems like they keep the lights on with the raffle but i assume the other miners are ok 18:56:18 ive heard horror stories of solopool.org thiugh, so i dont trust grifter pools 18:56:56 i was an xmrvsbeast or moneroocean miner befire, liberty-pool for a while (low hr moneroocean fork) 18:57:56 ofrnxmr[m]: If the raffle hashrate only comes from the miners, then *at best* the miners earn the same amount overall as if they had a 0% dev fee and the whole thing is just a marketing gimmick. IF they're actually honest 18:58:55 Otherwise they'd have to pay out if their own pockets to add hashrate to it 18:59:26 nono 18:59:35 i think the raffle pays them too 18:59:52 like donate 10%, we give back 5 to randdom miners 19:00:52 I don't know why but my hashrates are no closer to the ones specified on the bechmarking sites 19:01:19 as reoorted by xmrig? 19:01:34 in the terminal, press h 19:01:43 stradman: The top numbers you see there are extreme overclockers doing their thing 19:01:58 top benchmarks are, if course, tuned by people chasing top numbers 19:02:11 I am using hardwaee that's not overclockable 19:02:16 *hardware 19:02:17 Often stable just long enough to run the benchmark 19:02:36 stradman: less teach more learn 19:02:42 what is your hr 19:02:45 and cpu 19:03:00 as reported by xmrig when you press h 19:03:39 Max hashrate is reaching 140 H/s on my old laptop with i3 while benchmarkers reported over 300H/s 19:03:50 2k advertised on benchmark, you are seeing invizible ________ numbers. hard to help if you dont soeak 19:03:54 h e l l o 19:04:02 answer qs 19:04:21 hello ? 19:04:31 i3? theres like 70 of them 19:05:03 Intel® Core™ i3-3217U 19:05:36 Don't even bother with that 19:05:45 "Monero follows Satoshi's..." <- While that is somewhat true, it's not (any CPU = one Vote). You will need some specialized hardware, to be competitive in the XMR mining game. Peps will tell you stories about, how the mined a block, on a car radio, but also tell you, if you hit nothing, it's just bad luck. Hashrate matters. The more H/s you can produce, the better luck you have. High hashrate cost money. Cope. 19:06:45 It's not luck, it's statistics 19:07:12 the new rig has i5-1135G7 19:07:18 While cpus are not all equal, they are all accessible to regular consumers 19:07:24 and a mobile Nvidia GeForce MX430 19:07:29 stradman: very bad hr 19:07:38 i get more on my phone 19:07:45 and my car radio 19:07:45 even the new i5 is bad ? 19:07:58 stradman: Still pretty bad. Intel sucks for mining 19:08:09 stradman: Not useful for mining Monero 19:08:12 power to hashrate, not great 19:09:01 dear o dear 19:09:44 are CPU heat limited? Like from the OEM ? 19:10:06 all throttle if they get hitter than soec 19:10:31 some are designed to ganfle higher heats and ocerclocjs 19:10:48 you should be undervolting and underclocking thiugh 19:10:50 if I cool more, will I get higher hashes ? 19:10:56 stradman: No, it's about power efficiency of the cpu architecture. Ryzen is 2x more efficient 19:11:31 "I don't think CPU mining stops..." <- Is that why those cloud dev preachers, complain about slow start-up time for their functions. Sorry bro, we'll run your lambda, after the next block 🤣 19:11:32 stradman: undervolt and you get more hashes per watt 19:11:41 and lower temps 19:12:03 won't I even get 0.03 XMR (minimum payout) with the 100 so hashes ? 19:12:18 In a few years maybe 19:12:24 TrasherDK[m]: "well you gotta do the math on that next block earnings vs the hourly fee that we get from the customers..." 19:12:42 stradman: wuth that, just find anither use 19:12:45 few year, alright 19:13:03 another use ? 19:13:14 k4r4b3y[m]: Unironically yes. And you will quickly find that they earn far more by renting out the cpu time than by actually mining 19:13:25 p2pool perhaps. it a media server 19:13:28 or* 19:15:09 where do you rent out CPU time ? 19:17:16 stradman: I'm talking about cloud providers 19:17:31 There was a time when mining on a vps was profitable 19:17:44 oh ! 19:18:13 But that's not a thing anymore 19:18:40 Most of them ban you if you do it, and even if they don't it still costs 10x more than you earn 19:19:33 well let my i3 mine, some exercise for the old guy 19:22:47 Hope you're not paying for the electricity that it uses 19:23:09 I do, but hope it doesn't use much 19:23:41 Well, it's a weak cpu 19:24:07 But you're paying ~2-3x what you'll earn (at today's price) 19:25:02 i'll not earn anything for a week, so 2-3x $0 = $0 :) 19:25:13 why didn't browser-mining catch on? it could be a very viable alternative to ad-revenue-based internet model... 19:25:13 0 pay 19:26:20 k4r4b3y[m]: Bad actors had the incentive to sneak miners everywhere and abuse their users, so the whole thing got a terrible reputation from the start 19:26:36 But that was with the old Cryptonight algo 19:27:41 RandomX has the 2GB ram requirement on top of that, and an entire custom VM. Emulating all that in JS is a non-starter 19:28:01 yeah, I forgot about that with randomx 19:28:26 apart from that, why didn't pay-with-hash-to-use model with Monero public nodes catch on? 19:28:43 it is also another good idea imo.. could incentivize the node operators 19:29:11 Few know about it, and even fewer ever bothered setting it up 19:29:59 do wallets support that (other than the monero-cli ) ? 19:30:31 Plus, the odds of anyone finding a block in just a few hashes are so low that it's not really self-sustaining without many users 19:30:41 It would be even cooler to see that feature combined with p2pool-mini, given the much greater ease of finding a share 19:30:51 k4r4b3y[m]: Not that I know of 19:31:21 merope1: yeah 19:49:28 "apart from that, why didn't pay..." <- thats why 19:49:40 makes sense 19:50:06 hard to make sense of the opposite 23:29:24 Hello, I am finding pretty weird conflicting results here and i'm sure the answer is pretty easy. I see you can mine Monero with a GPU, for some reason I thought RandomX could only be used on CPU. 23:40:12 LikWidChz: you can doesn't mean it's a good idea 23:40:23 it's slower on GPUs 23:41:08 like how slow is it? I have a 5950x and it does ~13000 h/s I also have OLD OLD OLD 660TI's 23:44:15 LikWidChz: https://1stminingrig.com/how-to-mine-monero-randomx-with-cpu-gpu/ 23:44:25 this has a couple example GPUs and their randomx hashrate 23:45:17 not only slow but very inefficient 23:45:25 heh you were right, not even worth it. 23:45:40 I am mining with 12x orange pi 5's and my 5950x. 23:47:26 other question you ever use hashvault? 23:49:05 It has a solo mine option and I'm not quite sure how to use that.. I see options where you can solo mine directly to your wallet, but then I have been on other pools with other coins where you solo mine to the pool? 23:49:10 not sure which/what is better 23:49:20 if you solo mine you shouldn't use a pool 23:49:53 either use p2pool if you want frequent payouts or just solo mine directly into your wallet 23:50:17 but i'm not familiar with hashvault solo mine option 23:51:11 well I have my payouts set at .003XMR and it takes ~like a day ish or less to hit that 23:51:48 frankly I am having concerns wether this is something ill be doing long term it seems the rewards are very low. I'm about 2 weeks messing with XMR. 23:52:30 its definitely more of a patience game. i like it cause its like "set it and forget it" and then as time marches forward you have more monero than you started with 23:52:40 its a crockpot of money 23:53:05 a slow cooker. 23:53:13 slowcooker. im surprised thats not one word 23:54:30 hahaha 23:54:32 i wonder if GPUs will ever get good enough to be worth using again. like.... what are the circumstances where an expansion card would get that powerful 23:55:13 probably when they stop using so much goddamn power. Frankly I am sad my 2x 660TI's from 1000 years ago are not worth using 23:55:51 lulz. u just need a way to recycle that heat energy 23:56:16 gpu based cookers that steam rice or something 23:56:26 RiceCoin 23:59:43 I guess its interesting though, they have people building entire PC's just to mine this coin and have a handful of them running vs a bunch of GPU's on another coin