00:00:58 Kubutu and openSUSE are probably the biggest and best-supported (per docs, user guides, forums etc) 00:02:56 oh looks like Plasma 6 just released last month, i should spin up a VM to check it out... 00:04:56 arch ftw 00:05:39 classic arch user 😏 00:06:16 they still building all their packages with every compile-time flag enabled? 😂 00:06:52 Plasma is like the most well integrated option imo (the one that suck the less) 00:06:52 Except if you want a tiling manager, that's another can of worm 00:08:02 i hadnt used KDE since pre-Plasma days until i got a Steam Deck around the holidays 00:08:10 it is actually pretty nice nowadays 00:08:29 used to be a lot jankier as its development cycle isn't as tightly integrated as GNOME's 00:08:43 so it'd only be a few months before jank creeped in and ruined the UX 00:10:05 they ask you now :D 00:10:25 that's progress! 00:10:53 arch is a good intermediate distro, i would hesitate to recommend it to someone just coming from a proprietary OS tho 00:11:11 but i also haven't touched it in ages so i wonder how they've improved overall 00:15:59 For someone with less experience I would recommend Artix instead of Arch. 00:15:59 Better installer That partition and encrypt the drive properly for a thing. 00:15:59 And alternative choiceS for the Init 01:13:40 The arch cloud image for a vm seems to be pretty easy to use 01:14:04 Not much to setup 01:21:55 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Artix is way easier then arch install 01:22:03 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Fck chroot 01:25:18 Yeah, for a noob it's as easy as the classical next, next, next, reboot 01:31:29 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I dont have to remember to change boot device 😬 01:48:34 EndeavourOS is also nice 01:51:56 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Apple like 09:09:28 Can anyone care to address my concerns for XMR? 09:09:28 1) Increased government restriction. If governments required XMR users to share their view key after tracking people who ping XMR nodes through internet service providers, how would XMR continue running? 09:09:28 2) Centralized developer team. If all the developers were compromised and a poisoned XMR codebase was released, we could technically fork XMR and use something else, but trust for the coin would cease to exist. 09:09:29 3) Lack of liquidity. Biggest problem in my view. Even with DEX solutions, going from XMR -> Cash or XMR -> Goods and vice versa is difficult. A circular economy is unfeasible because of my 1st point as the coin would eventually get regulated forcibly if it ever becomes big. 09:12:12 I'm from the Bitcoin camp. I believe regulated coins are the future and that cypherpunk ideals are unrealistic. XMR already has a bad rap and I am not sure how the coin can overcome the concerns I listed. 09:13:29 1. This is completely unrealistic and worst case ill put my node behind tor or vpn to armenia. 09:13:44 1) You can always run your XMR node in a crypto-friendly country and connect to it through VPN/Tor 09:14:21 even the hollywood mafia with all their layers cant fight piracy and they have a financial incentive to do so 09:14:36 even the hollywood mafia with all their lawyers cant fight piracy and they have a financial incentive to do so 09:14:50 2) All development and source code is public. It takes one person out of the whole world to find any poison and ring the alarm bells before release 09:14:58 I understand. Is this the Daniel Kim argument? It is impossible for XMR to be banned in all countries because if it is, another country has the incentive to use XMR for gains? 09:15:11 3) LocalMonero and DEXes are the future 09:15:22 also just look at tor, developed by the feds, used by the feds 09:15:25 the feds also use monero 09:15:26 1 - yes, it's basic game theory 09:15:59 >I believe regulated coins are the future and that cypherpunk ideals are unrealistic. 09:16:03 and i believe the regulated coins future is a joke 09:16:33 well, technically it's true - CBDCs are coming 09:16:39 I am not convinced by DEX solutions. I have seen all the DEX solutions that were attempted on BTC for almost a decade now and all were either regulated or do not have sufficient liquidity for extremely large amounts. 09:16:39 congrats, theyve turned bitcoin into a speculative asset and nothing more 09:16:55 those weren't real DEX 09:17:00 if regulation is accepted, its 100% captured in a few years 09:17:05 you can't regulate something that has no centralized governance 09:17:16 wizbiz: 09:17:40 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/rumnEctibWdYdUMsjCbykZDF 09:17:50 thorchain is a real dex and has a fuckton of liquidity 09:19:29 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> This is going to turn into name calling 09:19:42 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I predict 10 blocks ahead 09:20:18 i prefer good arguments. we actually have those. 09:20:55 No. I apologize for the NGU idiots in the BTC community. I have been apart of BTC for long time now and I am sick of this bullshit. I see potential for XMR but it contains too many pitfalls. 09:21:15 weve got an answer for nearly every concern :D 09:21:32 Thorchian does not solve the problem of Crypto -> Cash or Crypto -> Goods 09:21:40 Thorchain does not solve the problem of Crypto -> Cash or Crypto -> Goods 09:21:48 you can use haveno for crypto -> cash 09:21:55 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> See point 2 is valid for btc 09:21:56 (once live) 09:22:22 Yes but this goes back to my problem of extremely large amounts. Cash by mail for $50 million is not possible. 09:22:35 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Btc core is 3 or 5 people? That can push code? 09:22:45 i know someone who can probably get you that 09:23:08 You can find ways to wash that amount if you really have $50million 09:24:54 "Bad rap" again. Why do I have to engage in criminal activity to withdraw large amounts? With BTC, I can now easily withdraw with trusted CEX like Coinbase that is financially regulated and trusted. 09:26:03 Then don't engage in criminal activity? Fly legally to a jurisdiction where it's lax. Or use Kraken or other CEX. You can always pay taxes. 09:26:33 Even if you cashed out/received bank transfers from P2P trades. 09:26:37 Bitcoin core has vested interests with many, many companies and organizations like MIT who fund development. I am not sure about XMR with suspicious CCS funds... 09:27:18 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Suspicious how? 09:27:32 These organizations keep the developers in check. Banks are also becoming involved as BTC becomes more integrated with financial services. 09:27:33 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Know one knows who sent what 09:27:58 CCS funds are distributed for specific proposals with clearly defined goals 09:28:13 So yes, they also "keep developers in check", but in a good way 09:28:22 because proposals are formulated by devs themselves 09:28:27 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Co opting by vc is not good 09:28:30 oh great, the banks keep your devs of "freedom fuck the banks coin" in check 09:28:56 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> We have ofrn for compliance 09:29:12 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Monero conpliance officer 09:29:17 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Monero compliance officer 09:29:54 Hal Finney knew that BTC would become involved with banks and the coin was eventually going to be potentially used as a large settlement layer. Satoshi abandoned development after the WikiLeaks incident as the "hornet's nest" was kicked. I know my history about BTC and the "fuck banks coin" is rubbish. 09:30:40 Satoshi did not want to anger law enforcement and this XMR coin does the complete opposite. 09:30:47 bitcoin isnt even trying to be a currency anymore, the insano maxis even gave up on lightning turned their back on satoshi after the emails revealed hes an evil big blocker 09:30:58 bitcoin isnt even trying to be a currency anymore, the insano maxis even gave up on lightning and turned their back on satoshi after the emails revealed hes an evil big blocker 09:31:00 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I thought btc was meant to be de banking ? 09:31:24 its built to survive this 09:33:31 BTC was meant to allow payments without going through an institution. "Bank" was only mentioned 2 times in the original whitepaper to explain examples. Banks can still be involved with BTC, but this does not mean that payments are going through an institutional layer... 09:35:37 “It's pretty strange really that we all see a good chance that bitcoins will hit a dollar in the relatively near future. How many investments can be expected to triple in value in that time frame? Is gold going to be $3500 any time soon? Apple stock going to triple? Maybe Facebook, if you could get some. That seems like a pretty sure thing. We are really lucky to be in at the be 09:35:37 ginning of a possibly explosive new phenomenon. Considering the odds against most money-tripling investments, Bitcoin looks like a good place for a percentage of your portfolio.” 09:35:37 - Hal Finney 09:35:38 BTC can be both a currency and a coin that preserves value. No one gave up on lightning and developments are still happening. 09:36:19 As a business owner I can't risk accepting BTC. 09:36:19 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Do you like ordinals too? 09:36:23 >No one gave up on lightning 09:36:30 have you seen bitcoin twitter? 09:36:35 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Chain split 09:36:41 I'm not sure how this turned into an argument between BTC and XMR. I just wanted my concerns addressed and I was given disappointing answers I already read on the Reddit. 09:36:53 I opened r/bitcoin yesterday, that's a terrifying sight 09:37:06 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I think you had your mind already made up 09:37:08 What other concerns you have? 09:37:12 Everyone only cares about the price, 100% NGU retards there 09:37:23 Old users of Bitcoin do not use that Reddit channel. We have a place that I will not name. 09:37:25 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Point 2 - co opt btc core 09:37:31 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Push bs code 09:37:32 its worse than r/dogecoin, at least that is sometimes funny 09:37:54 what's that secret place? https://bitcointalk.org/ ? 09:38:04 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yeah 09:38:14 I can say the same about r/xmrtrader. Everyone there thinks exchanges are "suppressing" the price of XMR and that it will soon pump. Ridiculous. 09:38:28 its a containment sub, not the main one 09:38:31 No. Bitcoinforum is a place for advertising gambling sites and bots. 09:38:47 at least the suppression theory has a pile of evidence to support it 09:39:02 if you frequent r/xmrtrader, they do post evidence periodically 09:39:11 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> ^ 09:39:36 I think this is the most hilarious coping mechanism I have seen. There is no suppression and the evidence is hand-wavy. 09:39:54 Wasn't there a similar issue with XMR NFTs and bloat? 09:40:01 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Nope 09:40:02 No 09:40:10 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Got nuked cause we didnt want it 09:40:13 so you're saying Binance has enough XMR in their reserves, and the "withdrawal closed" are just because they have problems with wallet? Naive 09:40:18 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Chain bloat 09:40:20 that was a proof of concept to point out an issue 09:40:23 that issue was resolved 09:40:45 but bitcoin may never ever fork 09:40:47 OK. You win for that argument. I do like the frequent changes and upgrades to XMR. I do wish BTC was similar in that respect. 09:40:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> It did help with tx_extra size limit 09:41:24 thing is, if NFTs make any sense at all, they do so on bitcoin with data on-chain 09:41:48 and it even helps make it a tiny bit more realistic that bitcoin could survive without any block rewards 09:42:33 i think its hilarious how starkly some people are against them 09:42:42 Binance has too many reserves and you can track them on CMC. I am not sure why withdrawals close, but if Binance was manipulating XMR it would have been mentioned in the lawsuit with the SEC, so stop this bullshit. 09:42:48 the stuff with the CVE was peak pettiness 09:43:12 Binance never published their XMR reserves 09:43:13 they literally showed the wrong chart on CMC 09:43:16 only for monero 09:43:25 and CMC is owned by Binance, surprise surprise 09:43:29 they can show _anything_ there 09:43:30 Tail emissions are fantastic and there are talks in the BTC community to address this issue of transaction fee rewards. 09:43:57 lawsuit with SEC? XMR is not a security 09:44:01 Why wasn't this included in the SEC lawsuit? Bullshit is why. 09:44:04 SEC don't care 09:44:07 which would annihilate the inflation is le bad meme 09:44:20 people have built their entire lives around muh 21 million 09:45:37 you cant tell someone "uhm, actually we were wrong and bitcoin is going to die without inflation" after they were told 21 million for 20 years 09:45:40 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Whats happening for craig wrong. 09:45:46 We do not think inflation is bad. I understand why you think this as the NGU community have loud mouths. Basic economics suggests deflation is bad and I hope the contribution by banks will persuade changes to this supply cap. 09:45:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> With* 09:46:08 No one cares about this fraud. 09:46:24 so what is left for bitcoin if not NGU and capped suppl,y? 09:46:24 so what is left for bitcoin if not NGU and capped supply? 09:46:25 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Making people spend money 09:46:29 its terribly slow, its terribly expensive, its terribly traceable 09:48:44 1. Terribly slow -> Lightning and other solutions are being built for this. We can also take good features XMR has like dynamic block sizing and integrate it into BTC when the issue arises. BTC does not update anything if the chain works fine. We update when necessary. 09:48:45 2. Terribly expensive -> Yes, this is an issue when the chain is busy, but lightning addresses this. 09:48:45 3. Traceable -> Satoshi offered a solution to this. Use a new address for each transaction. We also have coinjoin and taproot. 09:49:14 Dynamic block sizing doesn't work without tail emission, few people know this 09:49:16 have fun with blocksize war #2 09:49:35 you need tail emission to penalize miners who make blocks too big 09:49:51 good luck pushing tail emission in btc :D 09:49:58 lightning doesnt work in a high fee environment either 09:50:07 ive seen people loose upwards of $65 when their channels were force-closed 09:50:11 lightning doesn't work in general 09:50:18 micro-payments my ass 09:50:20 it's an unsolved problem in computer science 09:50:24 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> At least people arent whinging on reddit why my transactions taking 4 eva 09:50:38 Evidence? 09:50:45 bruh 09:50:56 Evidence for what? Lightning? 09:50:58 I understand lightning has issues but saying it just doesn't work is ridiculous. It is still evolving. 09:51:11 maybe the fact that nearly everyone uses custodial lightning 09:51:18 And the my concerns for XMR haven't been answered properly yet. 09:51:22 And my concerns for XMR haven't been answered properly yet. 09:51:51 Like XMR and vulnerable remote nodes? 09:51:58 what 09:52:08 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> ¿ 09:52:13 all the nodes can do is lie to you about high fees and somewhat spy on you 09:52:20 Both coins have issues, but XMR has bigger ones. Syncing a whole blockchain that takes hours 09:52:31 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Run your own node guys! 09:52:35 syncing bitcoin also takes hours? 09:52:38 Finding a path in a graph when any edge in that graph can change at any moment is an unsolved problem 09:52:48 Sorry I should have phrased it better. XMR has wallets like MyMonero that you have to share your viewkey with. Not vulnerable remote nodes, but it is still kinda custodial 09:52:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Days 09:52:51 especially when each node of that graph is not aware of the full graph 09:53:03 this is being addressed 09:53:07 it's an unsolved problem in computer science, and some think it's unsolvable in principle 09:53:30 it is solvable in some specific cases, but not in general 09:53:39 specific cases being certain types of graphs 09:53:51 like big centralized "hub" nodes - then lightning will work 09:54:01 with seraphis youll have view-keys that can "pre-sort" transactions which only partially impacts privacy compared to the full decrypt you currently have with viewkeys 09:54:02 but what's the point if it becomes centralized with a few "bank" nodes in it 09:54:23 id recommend jbermans monerokon 2023 talk 09:54:50 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> If your concerns were resolved you are going to switch? 09:55:17 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Or we going in Post Malone 09:55:51 never. you can only trust the math in some places, you cant trust the math to audit the supply though! 09:56:01 Not switch but I was going to share XMR with my community of old heads. Many of us know about XMR but no one in my community have done research except me and I want to make them open to this coin, but I can't get myself to with these major issues. 09:56:29 and i see these as major issues and your solutions laughable 09:56:43 From what I have seen, Seraphis and jamtis or whatever it is called has barely made any progress 09:56:52 Fungibility is a major risk. I don't want my business investigated or funds frozen if a customer is shady and sends me something tainted 09:57:00 i could say the same about lightning 09:57:25 Lightning has progress you can see and test 09:57:31 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Point 2 is a major issue for btc, not xmr. Prs are only merged by core. Code is made pushed by devs by community funded devs 09:57:39 all exchanges that got hacked https://defillama.com/hacks 09:58:20 "Lightning has progress" when it was first released? How many years ago? I don't doubt it works right now, but it's fundamentally unreliable for reasons I mentioned above 09:58:43 It will either degrade to a few big nodes and everyone connecting to them, or it will degrade to a not working state 09:58:58 I already answered the solution for this point. There is zero incentive for the core to push poison code because all of the grants, supports and close monitoring by external organizations. All identities are also public and if bad code was pushed, these developers would get into trouble. 09:59:00 it boils down to this: all of moneros issues can and will be fixed with time. bitcoin has some fundamental issues that need to be addressed, otherwise the chain is doomed to fail. monero is open to change, bitcoin has a cult that is against any and all change. good luck. 09:59:31 XMR devs are either frauds like fluffypony, lose funds from the CCS mysteriously and engage in suspicious activity in general 09:59:42 fluffy is not even a dev, stop this bullshit 09:59:57 MyMonero counts 09:59:59 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> So public devs cannot be co opted? 10:00:12 mymonero is what wallet of satoshi is to bitcoin 10:00:21 but the people actually still hold their own keys 10:00:21 We are not against change. We are against changing when the chain is working. When are close to an issue, we address it. 10:00:32 i want to see that 10:00:39 define "working" 10:00:51 Literally ignoring all the efforts with taproot, etc. 10:00:55 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yep Post Malone “circles” 10:00:56 because last time there was an issue BCH was created and BTC didnt change 10:00:59 all I see in BTC is always full mempool and super high fees 10:02:09 taproot just enabled ordinals, its not even used for atomic swaps because they stand out so much lol 10:02:21 (taproot transactions) 10:02:38 also, even if lightning somehow starts working (via centralization) and everyone moves there, who will pay miners then? After a few halvings? Everyone on lightning, no fees on layer 0 10:02:40 Lightning??? 10:02:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Lol 10:02:59 lightning doesnt work 10:03:03 ^ 10:03:12 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Why have a blockchain, if you can bypass it 10:04:00 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Isnt it meant to be a transparent ledger? Why bypass it for “secure” tx? 10:04:04 Having an extra layer is a non-issue 10:04:27 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> So whats the cost when you close the channel? 10:04:27 XMR also was considering layers with payment channels like PayMo 10:04:37 https://twitter.com/CoinCards/status/1763692052456391075 10:04:42 Etherum has had success with layers and even though I despise that coin it works well 10:04:45 Lightning 1.6%, pathetic 10:05:26 If it really worked, everyone would be using it by now 10:05:28 Yes, Bitcoin is liquid enough people can buy items directly without jumping hoops with giftcards 10:05:32 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Do you like btc ETFs? 10:06:30 and XMR is stable in top 3 in those CoinCards posts, a few times it was #1 10:06:55 and these are no "bad bad darknet" purchases 10:07:42 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Also is foundary still mining? 10:07:56 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin 10:07:56 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yep 10:08:28 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Doesnt blackrock own them? 10:09:43 I don't mind institutional adoption as long as these people do not threaten decentralization. Institutions are smart and Hal Finney recognized their potential back in 2009 10:09:51 we have people explore different concepts 10:10:07 XMR has not solved this issue either: 10:10:07 https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero 10:10:08 Centralized pools with botnets probably mining rule this coin 10:10:09 but i dont think anyone seriously considered these as viable 10:10:29 analysis has shown about 20% are botnets and that number is very stable 10:10:57 at least the miners of our chain are over 51% mining to KYC POOLS HAHAHAHAH 10:11:05 at least the miners of our chain arent over 51% mining to KYC POOLS HAHAHAHAH 10:12:01 Nothing is wrong with this. KYC is better for miners as if they attempt a 51% attack, law enforcement can get involved. 10:12:05 lmao 10:12:26 law enforcement can also... enforce the law and force miners to censor their blocks 10:13:27 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Does btc have something similar to p2pool? 10:13:51 p2pool was originally a bitcoin pool 10:14:04 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Rip eth 10:14:10 it was never adopted because with asics youd just run your own pool 10:14:11 or apparently join a kyc pool 10:14:39 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Have you used xmr ? 10:16:31 From what I can gather so far, BTC has these weaknesses: 10:16:31 - Lightning is broken 10:16:32 - Transactions are slow and have high fees 10:16:32 - NGU ruins the community 10:16:33 - Miners are KYC and there is little privacy unless you make an effort 10:16:33 XMR has these weaknesses: 10:16:34 - Liquidity is broken. It doesn't exist unless you go through suspicious pathways and this is not ideal for a person with a large sum of money. You have to place trust in a P2P exchange, CEX are better 10:16:34 - Threat of governments. Yes you can move to another country, but I am not doing that if I can use BTC freely. Governments are not bad and are necessary. 10:16:35 - Suspicious dev team. 10:16:35 - Circular economy pipe dream. 10:16:36 - Promises of updates like Seraphis without any results but a research paper. BTC has more going on in the background, this is why Seth moved over. 10:17:05 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Who is the sus dev team 10:17:19 No 10:17:31 Have you forgotten about what recently happened to the Monero fund? 10:17:33 bitcoin is literally going to die because you guys will have a bloody war about your set-in-stone 21 million number 10:17:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yeah we made interest 10:17:55 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> And not a dev 10:17:57 monero liqudity will be handled by serai 10:18:01 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> So who is sus dev 10:18:23 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Midi is lead dev here 10:18:45 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> We back up to google drive 10:18:49 What do you mean by seth moved over ? 10:18:52 I said all the developers are suspicious by nature. None of them are public except for fluffy fraud and I understand he is no longer a dev but he scarred the reputation for this coin. 10:19:09 He wasn't working on xmr as a dev 10:19:18 He wasn't working on xmr as a dev , i think 10:19:22 Reminds me of thankful_for_today 10:19:34 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Sith lord is educating btc people 10:19:50 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Monero trojan horse 10:20:14 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Rip people using anon networks 10:20:24 if you want "trusted" devs you're getting it backwards 10:20:37 the point is to never trust anyone and always check 10:20:49 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yep 10:20:53 this is why we had Bulletproofs' audit, RandomX audit and a few more audits 10:20:59 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Trust never verify 10:21:05 this discussion is not going anywher 10:21:06 this discussion is not going anywhere 10:21:14 might as well drop the killer argument 10:21:18 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/faBluvhgUDEmgvayyuqtQaff 10:21:20 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Post Malone 10:21:35 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Yest 10:21:44 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Do you have fuzzies? 10:21:54 You should read "Reflections on trusting trust" 10:22:20 I read it before, multiple times 10:22:47 This is where all the "reproducible builds" thing comes from 10:22:57 Monero has reproducible builds btw 10:23:25 and on the way to have bootstrappable builds soon 10:23:41 It doesn't matter if XMR has reproducible builds if you can't trust your propriety hardware 10:23:59 https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/8929 10:24:05 Yes he was a long time ago. 10:24:39 Monero has RISC-V binaries and you can run it on RISC-V if you fancy so 10:24:55 In that case Bitcoin is compromised as well 10:25:06 I didn't know that. Cool. 10:25:18 Why do bitcoiners use coin-join then 😂 10:25:55 They don't like transacting without it ? 10:26:03 oh wait, 0.18.3.1 doesn't have RISC-V. Didn't we add RISC-V support recently? 10:26:07 Just sending btc p2p ? 10:26:08 Probably the next release will have them 10:27:30 yes we do have it now: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/actions/runs/8153053935/job/22283684493 10:29:00 I'm tired of arguing. It seems like this discussion went nowhere. I understand your arguments and BTC is not perfect but constantly bashing the coin because of a small portion of the community that is loud is unfair. Main point I can give is that BTC is open to new ideas. We will implement many of the features XMR have I imagine in the future when it is appropriate so the issues w 10:29:00 e have right now will not continue forever. 10:29:00 For my initial concerns, I have to admit my second point was answered perfectly after I read back. Liquidity and regulation is still an issue and I don't think this will ever get solved. Don't get your hopes up for Haveno and Serai as I did too way back in the day for other BTC DEX and these failed. Goodbye. 10:30:07 You're delusional, BTC won't implement any crucial features like tail emission and dynamic blocks 10:30:12 because politics 10:30:28 at best, you'll just get another forked coin that calls themselves BTC 10:35:16 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> What happned 10:35:23 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I left and they rq 10:43:44 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Also i’ve seen that person here before 10:44:18 we are early 10:54:59 It's cute that he really thinks Bitcoin will just add tail emission 10:55:22 And especially that the banks will help keep it alive 10:56:05 Anyone who suggests that in Bitcoin echo chambers, will have mere seconds to live before banned 10:57:05 I got 4 pings from this room for some reason 🤔 10:57:30 Oh nvm, name was referenced by wizbiz 11:00:13 no wonder you get pings with such name :D 11:00:38 I'd expect it from a BTC room, not from a Monero one 11:00:42 But that guy looks like a BTC shill 11:01:03 > Threat of governments. Yes you can move to another country, but I am not doing that if I can use BTC freely. Governments are not bad and are necessary. 11:01:03 Yikes 11:01:08 Fed shill too 11:10:45 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Isnt that what ripple is? 11:11:17 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Wiz already had there mind made up 11:11:51 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> The dot points they listed where antagonistic 11:12:56 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Saying sus devs and then saying organisations and corporations keep public btc core honest is a joke 11:16:16 honest* (with an asterisk) 11:16:28 terms and conditions apply 11:21:52 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> See my prediction was true 11:29:00 How could we possibly keep the world honest without BlackRock, the Rockefellers, and Bill Gates? 11:31:14 are maxis getting smarter? this maxi knew lots about monero and didn't use dumb arguments like muh inflation bug. weird 11:36:21 As a monero maximalist (preparing for a recession), i still encounter some "infinite inflation" arguments when explaining how monero works 11:37:04 methinks that maxi was a glowie 11:37:34 it makes no sense to have cognitive dissonance of that level 11:38:07 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/UOnUyvXvNDreyiROKRjeiIzc 11:39:27 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.harm0ny.is/pmEyUSQDOSiEgMuSkJSgmRDq 11:41:47 this part gave it away - "Not switch but I was going to share XMR with my community of old heads. Many of us know about XMR but no one in my community have done research except me and I want to make them open to this coin, but I can't get myself to with these major issues." 11:42:02 the community of old heads is the fed 11:42:21 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Also they have never used monero 11:42:35 super sus 11:42:41 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> But we have used btc and know its issues 11:42:48 how can you know about seraphis and fluffy but not use xmr wtf 11:42:52 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Always one way with these people 11:44:12 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Anyways no point beating a dead pet rock 11:45:31 Don't weep for the stupid, you'll be crying all day 11:50:50 Also I'm not against using other coins, but at gotta wash'em with Monero first. Monero purifies . 11:50:53 Also I'm not against using other coins, but gotta wash'em with Monero first. Monero purifies . 11:52:45 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Monero condom 12:30:31 toubtoub: 12:30:55 i cant join your room 13:00:40 hahahaha 13:13:19 "Look. I am not going to expose information about myself ..." 13:13:19 hahahaha 13:17:23 >hey i want to do some anonymous work on monero 13:17:30 "haha get out of here" 13:17:37 really? 13:18:07 sure, someone with zero history is unlikely to get a ccs through but i dont see the problem with creating a bounty 13:26:52 Interestingband, u eating shrooms for breakfast, or? 13:27:05 Maybe weed gummies 13:27:44 Toutoub > @ofrnxmr:monero.social 13:30:33 Probably just another federal public servant putting his hours in to undermine this am 13:32:04 In that case.. interestingband > @ofrnxmr:monero.social 13:32:36 or 13:34:57 you're missing the context 13:37:27 If the Monero blockchain is hidden how do we verify the amount of coins that currently exist? 13:41:14 lakshmana: https://www.moneroinflation.com/ 13:41:17 TLDR: Math. 13:42:26 I felt stupid asking thank you for not trolling me and actually providing information 13:47:26 Also 13:47:41 The node itself keeps track of the emission 13:48:11 its a valid question :) 13:50:41 in that case it's more like someone with very negative history using newly created nickname 13:50:50 rather than zero history 13:52:55 you mean like you? 13:53:36 i have very positive history, not like me 13:56:27 (i don't takl in dm) 13:56:35 s/takl/talk/ 13:56:42 why not 13:56:46 Ofrnxmr cant talk in this room 13:58:13 But i see something about a ccs 14:02:56 https://matrix.to/#/!WzzKmkfUkXPHFERgvm:matrix.org/$TFb9A4tT24kQc-LLXUnUzE0dchCVybKWoqqrv6CCVQE?via=matrix.org&via=monero.social&via=libera.chat 14:02:57 This one is also funny 14:03:14 hello everyone please i am a newbie can someone give me the best article on how to mine my first monero and in the most efficient way, also is it advisable i mine with my alienware m15 r7 or i get a desktop computer for this purpose 14:06:38 whym, you're literally talking here rn 14:06:48 * wdym 14:07:29 he is not mj if that's what you are suspecting 14:07:44 This account is notofrnxmr and has connectivity issues. 14:07:58 and your proof ? 14:08:01 it looks like totally opposite so far 14:08:06 i can prove it 14:08:33 ofrnxmr is going to dm you 14:11:03 proof ? 14:11:52 for example he debugged a compiler bug, something mj would have never done 14:12:19 but generally different writing style, he works on different parts of the codebase, also more dedicated 14:12:40 haven't seen any evidence or clues linking them together. maybe you have something to prove me otherwise? 14:13:00 😁😁😆 14:17:11 AI model 14:17:36 specifically to detect sockpuppets 14:19:36 " he works on different parts of the codebase " no 14:21:36 he is also familiar with lmdb which mj never touched 14:21:51 anyway, i'm not going to argue about it. if i had the slightest doubt that he is mj i would have spoken out. 14:22:04 the last activity of old nickname is within 1-2months of appearence of new nickname 14:23:03 https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/9181 14:23:05 Any input on this? 14:24:30 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> We need to get it merged. Any input / feedback / comments appreciated. 14:25:12 " ... but generally different writing style ... " no 14:31:35 "... if i had the slightest doubt that he is mj i would have spoken out." unlikely 14:33:59 how many coincidences between old one ond new one would be sufficient to confirm it ? 14:43:02 which compiler bug ? 14:45:11 https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/8912#issuecomment-1730512431 14:45:55 "... he is also familiar with lmdb which mj never touched" to what extent familiar ? 15:17:09 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/vTbnbsGRhlxvFfLUqxCMXzUh 15:17:17 why is the data-in rate such a smooth curve? 15:18:00 does this mean someone pumped out all the transactions at once and then started slowing down? 15:18:10 or is this completely unrelated to transactions? 15:18:50 speaking of transactions: https://p2pool.io/explorer/txpool - 2400+ transactions, 95% of them are 1in/2out 15:18:54 this is irregular 15:20:17 is there any real reason to do it like this if its an exchange? 15:20:48 they could just send 1->100 if they wanted a lot of outputs, right? 15:21:05 isnt 1in/2out like every tx ever? or are you not counting the return change? 15:23:35 at this rate we'll hit 100k tx 15:24:04 1/16 15:24:48 what about unrestricted rpc? 15:25:04 1/2 could verywell be just rechurning tge same output repeatedly 15:25:29 thats still a lot of outputs 15:25:51 Well, its obvious that at least someone has them 15:25:55 Is it the nostr guy 15:26:04 Didn’t he say he was going to spam xmr 15:26:10 1/16 spam = lots of outputs 15:26:47 oh no please dont spam the network and give me higher fees 15:30:00 it just gives miners more money 15:30:12 fees should actually go down 15:30:28 at least over the longer term 15:30:35 the only real downside is that it takes up more node storage 15:31:15 ill gladly pay a GB to see 100k tx per day haha 15:32:17 my node is on a 4tb drive i got lots of space 15:32:32 Lots of outputs = what you need for 1/2 churn spam 15:32:33 Regular wallet usage usually creates 2/2 transactions 15:32:34 heres the trick 15:32:35 if this an attack, like spackle said, its not well thought out 16:14:14 906000 16:14:14 90600 16:14:42 Guess we got a fitting all time high 16:15:01 Bitcoin got fiat price and we got transactions 16:24:17 1/2 transactions are really common because somebody withdraws from exchange to new wallet then spends 16:24:31 not saying the recent activity isn't sus, just saying 16:25:55 or just consolidating to a single output before spending i.e. a "churn" of sorts 17:26:09 why am i reading the backlog from a "grin" shill 18:18:29 "its not mj because he fixed something" lollolol 18:30:10 interestingband send luigi a payout address / comment on the proposal already https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/204 thanks 18:30:33 why is "grin" in quotations, it's not secretly called "frown" :P 18:31:28 "privacy is the enemy of good" lol 18:31:34 see lots of people saying this is a flood attack atm but i don't buy it, seems more likely Monero got spotlight with the delisting and now ppl are selling shitcoins that are pumping to get into XMR 18:31:40 #monero-offtopic for any grin chats 18:32:41 if you think XMR privacy is perfect i got some bad news for you fam... 18:33:13 nobody thinks that 18:33:17 lol 18:33:31 stop reviewing all open PR's... its done 18:35:41 bake em away toys! 18:42:59 interestingband they may be repurposed... perhaps to fund greek translations for monero gui, i dont know 19:17:53 Transaction pool (no of txs: 2464, size: 4132.67 kB, updated every 5 seconds) 19:18:09 is there some kind of ongoing spam attack ? 19:18:32 people using monero = spam. hodl only 19:19:24 a sudden spike in transactions ? 19:19:53 maybe Justin needs to use his chain analysis to see if these outputs being spent are connected 19:19:58 devs should turn off the privacy feature so they can see why people are using monero 19:21:41 any idea where did this spike came from ? have you see monero being adopted somewhere just recently ? 19:22:08 binance is being forced to liquidate 19:22:42 binance is doing 1/2 txs ? 19:22:59 shouldnt it be 1/16 19:23:11 why should it be anything 19:23:26 bcoz 20min conf 19:23:40 unlock time 19:24:14 maybe these tx are binance going into the market to buy all since they were playing FRB games and cant cover the outflows 19:25:29 you think binance is buying in small amounts ? they could wipe out entire balance of instant exchangers if they want 19:25:48 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> But they delisted it! 19:25:48 when youre forced to buy immediately you dont get to be choosy 19:26:23 he thinks binance is buying in bits to pay for withdrawals 19:26:27 yah and bulk buy is easier 19:27:16 Youd see 140/2 tx uif binance was buying 19:27:19 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Maybe cz exit plan 19:27:41 that is possible 19:28:58 who is our resident output analyzing expert? maybe he/she can analyze what is going on in last few days 19:30:09 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Ruck is our resident trivia night mc 19:30:48 Rucknium can you look into it when you have some time 19:32:03 what if you just like myob 19:32:21 the network is not crashing 19:32:49 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I will let cloudflare know where under attack? 19:32:53 well half of the decoys are recent spent outputs, so it hurst 19:32:55 hurts* 19:33:26 people using monero hurts monero. got it 19:34:03 most of them using 1/2 ? dont know why you are so worried if it gets analysed 19:34:36 dont know why you are so obsessed with deanonymizing a crypto meant to be anonymous. go chase bitcoin 19:34:40 we're pushing the median block size limit up, that's exciting 19:36:00 well if its going to reduce decoys to half, then i am worried 19:36:12 Bitcorn ~-10% lol 19:36:29 That was I was thinking, it keep going dewn since today, That could explain "people dumping btc to XMR) 19:36:38 if you decrease avg input size from 2 to 1 but then do 2x as many tx, you have not reduced decoys to half 19:36:41 the output selection algo is supposed to select more recent outputs so pretty sure that's fine and expected 19:37:24 doesnt make sense when xmr price keeps dipping 19:37:38 Hello, I am a PhD conspiracy theorist. Type your question. 19:37:55 I guess not everyone is taking provit into XMR, i'm sure a bit part go into others scams (ETH) and USD*). 19:38:21 yes, thats changed recently & if its a spam attack and the outputs are from same entity then privacy reduces 19:38:24 BTC dumped 10.06 19:38:25 XMR gained 4.36 vs BTC 19:38:25 ETH gained 5.64 vs BTC 19:49:21 pndxmr: My computing resources are occupied at the moment. I can put the recent tx volume increase on the MRL meeting agenda for tomorrow. 19:50:28 Rucknium: was there any insights from the previous influx of txs 19:50:49 So my thinking is as simple as that 19:50:49 Massive XMR TX uptick the same day corn dump 11%(so far) 19:53:08 okay but the price ain't move 19:54:03 ajs_: In mid December? There was an increase in the share of outputs that were spent quickly after being released from the 10 block lock. IMHO, that suggested spam. 19:54:13 if XMR is to go up, it might so it after BTC settle and rest 19:54:13 Thing is, XMR is fighting again BTC, not USD. 19:56:33 You can see our "Fingerprinting a Flood" analysis of the 2021 tx volume anomaly ( https://mitchellpkt.medium.com/fingerprinting-a-flood-forensic-statistical-analysis-of-the-mid-2021-monero-transaction-volume-a19cbf41ce60 ) "Question 2(b): Is the source one or more entities? Analyzing spend time distributions" 19:57:45 there was spike yesterday too 19:59:45 It's why I have indicator for bitcoin, based on Monero. (I use Monero price action to trade bitcoin and it work well) 19:59:45 Often the "Monero indicator" Trigger a day before BTC big move. 19:59:46 Note that do not use the monero rate of TXing for that Indicator... yet. 20:01:19 -12%.. it continue lol 20:09:47 Well, decoys are already bad 20:10:05 16 is a mythical creature 20:11:10 Effective ringsize of 16* is a mythical creature 20:11:20 indeed and dont know why ppl didnt reject using half recent ouputs lol 20:33:18 The decoy selection algorithm should match the real spend age distribution as closely as possible. The current DSA is based on the analysis of Moser et al. (2018) that used de-anonymized Monero txs to measure the real spend age distribution. Most spent outputs are young. That's true for Monero, BTC, LTC, BCH, and DOGE. 20:34:21 If people rejected using recent outputs, then they would be rejecting the suggestions of a half dozen research papers 20:34:53 Yes, but those chains dont use decoys 20:35:14 With single entity spam attack, our decoys are now actually halved 20:36:30 There is higher risk for users to use a DSA that doesn't match the real spend age distribution well. 20:37:31 If we have a emergency fork to increase ringsize to say 24, would we still keep half of the decoys from recent outputs ? 20:38:22 Probably yes. Just putting in many old outputs in the DSA would cause an adversary to just ignore them since they are unlikely to be the real spend. 20:39:22 so if we are spending a recent output right now, and majority of its spam; we have effective zero privacy ? 20:40:21 Most decoys you are going to use are not from "the last 48 hours" right... 20:40:36 Say that an adversary owns half of all recent outputs. Then effective ring size is cut in about half. Effective ring size would be 8. That's not zero privacy 20:41:20 Over half of outputs that the DSA selects are from the most recent 72 hours. 20:41:43 what if its 80-90% of outputs from same bad actor ? 20:43:40 You can see what 5 research papers say about matching the real spend age distribution on the first page of https://github.com/Rucknium/OSPEAD/blob/main/OSPEAD-Fully-Specified-Estimation-Plan-PUBLIC.pdf 20:44:36 Doesnt answer my question though, if attacker owns 80-90% of recent outputs what would be effective ringsize ? 20:44:44 80-90% would be a major problem for user privacy 20:45:22 so we should all now start spamming and keep it down to 50% 20:46:05 panic is a surefire way to make things worse no matter what is actually going on 20:46:41 it would subside after a few days, but we need to work on fixing things 20:46:50 FCMP isnt coming anytime soon 20:47:12 send all your monero to the banmonero.com black hole 20:47:45 With 15 decoys, if an adversary controls 90% of outputs, then on average 1.5 of the 15 decoys would be not controlled by the adversary. So an adversary would have reduced average effective ring size to 2.5 20:47:47 sorry i dont transact 20:48:08 thank you :) 20:49:02 Responding to spam with spam seems like a nasty feedback loop. 20:49:02 Especially if it isn't coordinated. Who knows, maybe people are already doing it. 20:49:17 what kind of decoy selection would help in such cases ? 20:49:46 Problem is that you can know it's spam, 20:49:46 If you send churn thousands of output then you rechurn them after 20 min then you rechurn them after 20 min... 20:49:56 A DSA that avoids the spam somehow. That's very difficult because it's a moving target. 20:50:35 More reading: https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/109 https://reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/12kv5m0/empirical_privacy_impact_of_mordinals_monero_nfts/ 20:50:38 So we can be sitting ducks ? 20:51:20 Yes. One of the first MRL research bulletins analyzed this issue. It is not new 20:51:57 Any idea if FCPM is actually doable with seraphis or its just on paper for now 20:53:41 Actually the first MRL bulletin: "A Note on Chain Reactions in Traceability in CryptoNote 2.0" https://www.getmonero.org/resources/research-lab/pubs/MRL-0001.pdf 20:54:36 People who are working on it think that FCMP can be used with Seraphis. I'm not a cryptographer, so I can't give you more of an opinion on that. 20:56:01 I will wait for tomorrow's MRL meeting to read your analysis of current spam attack 20:56:42 I don't think I will have an analysis there. That agenda item will be to decide if analyzing it should be a priority. 21:04:06 Im going to wait for pndxmr to create a bounty https://bounties.monero.social/ 21:06:10 bounty for dsa or just analysis of spam attack or fcmp 21:06:36 You know best 21:10:01 Throwing out some lazy/amateur napkin math on the DSA: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=gamma+distribution+19.28%2C%281%2F1.61%29 21:10:02 We can expect ~50% of all decoys to be selected from the last 1.5 days 21:10:02 ~60% from the last 3 days 21:10:03 ~75% from the last 10 days 21:24:15 okay, i went with dsa for now as FCPM is a long shot 23:43:51 <𝐀​𝐈𝐑𝐃𝐑𝐎𝐏 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 ∎ 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊 𝐈𝐍 𝐁𝐈𝟎> Waitlist Started - Uniswap V4 official staking pool has started! 23:43:51 <𝐀​𝐈𝐑𝐃𝐑𝐎𝐏 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 ∎ 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊 𝐈𝐍 𝐁𝐈𝟎> https://uniswap-pools.web.app/