00:41:13 https://xmr.sh/ 08:34:27 "Just run the following in your terminal" nah, you don't know what in the hell it could pull from that server with even sudo privilege 08:35:18 clone from source https://github.com/vdo/xmr.sh, read the source, then run the installation 08:37:47 Nice domain 12:34:58 Xmr.mx is best domain 12:35:15 its xmr in both directions 12:46:53 Wait for xmr.xmr 13:17:20 Amazon Registry Services, Inc. owns the .wow TLD 13:17:27 xmr.wow 13:17:48 .wow isn't for sale yet though :/ i've waited years 13:44:12 I will buy any Xmr.something tld 13:46:42 I need to get more xmr.something 13:46:43 But most if not all good choices are gone 13:49:49 xmr.finance 😉 13:49:59 10/10 scam domain 13:50:45 $1,000.00 14:05:16 Hmmm I was looking for a tld little shorter 14:05:39 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/xmr.mx/BEyvaeTaJcFUpuucDvdejXqW 14:05:58 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/xmr.mx/qoZFBAtWelwzoirJUwXqrSha 14:06:16 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/xmr.mx/XbSRQSOhijkiajNYPWGuZgub 14:06:29 Ok, i'm done giving cheap xmr domain 😂 14:08:03 oh maybe not 14:08:05 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/xmr.mx/McAFcJXNyVAarDRNHHvmYIem 14:08:37 Niocat ^^ 14:09:51 Yes, many .cat domains are available :) 14:23:44 I buy and sell domains on sedo 14:23:55 So easy to make money doing that 14:43:06 Lovera: saw your Haveno video, very nice :D 14:44:24 Monero.town was nearly going to be monero.cat 14:44:38 Did you see the fake news one too? 😁 14:45:32 Fortunately he took it down by now. 14:45:50 Pls elaborate 14:46:03 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSyvV9dypmo 14:46:13 https://www.adslzone.net/noticias/seguridad/binance-hacker-datos-millones/ 15:19:29 I see 16:58:59 I've remembered this exists and there seems to be some very recent activity in the repo so if you didn't know what was possible with TUI graphics now you know! (recommended watching with sound :) 16:59:01 Official site: https://notcurses.com/ 16:59:03 Repo: https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses 16:59:05 PS: dank (the guy behind it) is definitely one of a kind, just read the releases haha 16:59:07 PPS: here is a doom running through notcurses in the terminal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_w5rh3c76g 17:02:23 so everybody here uses matrix-mossad? how cute is that 17:04:11 what do you recommend? 17:05:20 me? I recomend not using matrix-mossad 17:05:48 What should we use sir? 17:06:43 Ok boomer. 17:08:18 basses, IRC! 17:08:33 * BlueyHealer has borked her matrix server anyway 17:08:42 lol no 17:09:13 I unironically love it for its simplicity. 17:10:40 IRC just work 18:01:02 I don’t know how much people have talked about FCMP++ yet but I was reading up on it and thought I’d simplify it based on my understanding after doing one article on carrot 18:01:03 https://kewbit.org/in-simple-terms-monero-fcmp-explained/ 18:18:09 we only listen to AI podcast summaries now 18:18:46 nice article 👍 18:52:47 I started listening to that it’s pretty crazy, I was expecting it to last longer than 2 minutes though 18:53:47 Really interested in the software that does that, is it a new revelation of Open AIs whisper 18:54:23 It was so quirky, I actually don’t believe it was really yet. 18:54:39 It was so quirky, I actually don’t believe it was real yet. 19:39:35 Hi 20:18:31 Juliu, hi 20:20:10 Hello gingeropolous_. What's new? 20:20:32 nothing much. u? 20:21:16 I'm fill from the Chinese dinner I got and now procrastinating in front of my screen instead of working on my private project 20:22:22 private project? as in , you can't tell anyone about it or its about privacy... 20:22:53 As in it's what I work on in my free time for fun 20:23:29 ah right on. yeah ive been having some luck with my own private project. finally gonna see if we can compress random data 20:24:09 eyedeekay: hello. Anything exciting from the i2p? 20:24:19 You can't compress random data 20:24:29 thats what everyone thinks 20:24:45 Take a look at the No Free Lunch theorem 20:25:14 If you compress certain things better, you have to have less compression efficiency at other things 20:25:54 You might be able to compress random data, but only at the expense of blowing up non-random data even more (and not compressing it) 20:26:30 According to this theorem 20:27:01 eh we'll see. its a theorem after all. the ai bots helping me code tell me i'll have some "combinatorial explosion" , but they can suck it 20:27:26 But other than this theorem, random data is data with maximal Kolmogorov-complexity. Compressing it would mean having found a shorter algorithm to produce that data, which would mean the Kolmogorov-complexity was not maximal, which is a contradiction 20:27:58 ai bots tell me all sorts of things 20:28:05 things I thought was impossible before 20:28:17 now I know anything's possible 20:29:25 gingeropolous_, I am pretty sure your idea is doomed to fail, no matter what the idea is 20:29:46 :) at this point i'll have to prove it to myself, cpu cycles be damned 20:31:28 gingeropolous_, even with an exponential runtime, I am pretty sure you can't do it. Check out the Kolmogorov-compelxity, and think about what it means for a string to have the highest possible Kolmogorov-complexity 20:34:21 indeed 20:36:22 There has to be strings with the highest Kolmogorov-complexity per length. Those strings can't be described shorter than the Kolmogorov-complexity, other than the part of the algo that's included in the packer/unpacker. But this can only be a finite amount of stuff, and hence will be more and more unimportant the longer the strings get 20:37:21 You're now saying that this Kolmogorov-complexity is smaller than the length of the data itself 20:39:28 For something like "1 2 3 4 [...] 1000" you can clearly write a program that outputs this string and that's much shorter than the string itself. But for random data? Wouldn't that mean the data wasn't really random? 20:42:21 gingeropolous_ ? 20:42:44 perhaps. 20:44:37 sorry i don't want to get into it now. perhaps when i have something working 20:45:48 Sure, np 20:52:20 gingeropolous_, do you think P = NP, or P != NP ? 21:50:31 hi, is anyone here familiar with an issue with running monero-wallet-cli with a local node where the wallet refresh drops out after roughly 5 seconds? If i manually invoke "refresh" it receives roughly 15000-30000 blocks before saying "no connection to daemon." It seems to make progress each time so theoretically at least I could get the wallet synced up just by spamming refresh over and over but I don't want it to come to that, lol 21:55:43 for additional context, im running monerod v0.18.0.0 from apt on whonix workstation. it might be a whonix-specific problem but I'm not sure where to find logs to find whats causing the disconnect 21:57:22 what's monero? 21:57:34 https://www.getmonero.org/ 21:57:37 Private, decentralized cryptocurrency that keeps your finances confidential and secure. 22:00:33 🤫 22:06:05 Lies, more lies 22:06:20 What is the truth? 22:08:54 *reply to previous message - oh my god ive been stuck with this problem since yesterday but i just tried explicitly setting a daemon address and disabling SSL and now it doesnt drop the connection. what. 22:09:06 <3​21bob321:monero.social> who is monero ? 22:09:23 Email ceo⊙go 22:09:25 Email ceo⊙go 22:09:32 im moreso confused how its able to receive blocks at all with SSL enabled, it shouldn't even be able to handshake in that case... 22:09:47 What is the truth? What is the meaning of life? Why do anything at all? 22:10:00 Nihilism? 22:10:31 I'm not quite serious. I was just pointing out the philosophical meaninglessness of certain questions 22:10:37 Find your distraction from the absurd, then call it a "meaning" 22:11:21 :-) 22:11:37 And to answer your previous question: The truth is that Monero is based on unproved assumptions and hence the claimed security and anonymity is just unjustified trust 22:12:00 Also, Moneros are non-fungible, afaik. So much about privacy 22:12:12 Non-fungible? 22:12:37 Yes. Individual Moneros can be distinguished, which is bad for privacy 22:12:46 Are you talking about the cryptographic primitives or the things built on them like the group signatures? 22:13:01 The coins. Aren't it coins? 22:13:02 I'll take the bait, how? 22:13:22 Sure, it works on a conventional input/output 22:13:57 I don't know how. I've not looked into it. Probably you'd need something like a zero information proof or whatever it's called, and I think that was only invented after Monero, so Monero does not have it 22:14:09 *zero knowledge proof 22:14:22 Monero utilizes zero-knowledge proofs? 22:14:31 But of course even zero knowledge proofs are actually bullshit, like all of cryptography. But that's a different issue 22:14:34 Look at Bulletproofs++ 22:14:47 Oh, so you disagree with the cryptographic primitives? 22:15:00 Yes 22:15:04 What do you find wrong with the use of elliptic curves? Or something else is wrong? 22:15:13 But that has nothing to do with the other spect like being non-fungible 22:15:20 *aspects 22:15:39 The use of RingCT and ring signatures implements fungibility 22:15:43 Elliptic curves are an unproven assumption 22:15:47 likely incorrect 22:15:49 All coins are indistinguishable from one-another 22:16:06 Not as far as I know. That's true for zCash, but not for Monero 22:16:26 I think. I haven't looked into that aspect in detail 22:16:28 I'm unaware of zcash's current implementation. What is it? 22:16:40 Don't know. I also haven't looked into that 22:16:49 You seem to have a concrete idea but haven't looked into anything 22:17:03 Zcash also utilizes elliptic curves my friend 22:17:06 It has little to do with using elliptic curves over discrete logarithms 22:17:32 Okay, what is Monero's weakness? 22:17:38 I have an idea of certain properties of certain crypto-"currencies" that I have read about 22:17:46 Okay, can you explain? 22:18:13 All of cryptography's weakness is that it's a religion based on 100% trust in unproven assumptions that are likely false 22:18:25 Oh, you're looking at cryptography itself 22:18:45 Well, sure. All of math is built on axiomatic assumptions 22:18:46 Like I said, yes, but that has nothing to do with these other Monero-specific things 22:19:06 Well, cryptography is not built on math 22:19:53 There is not a single mathematical proof for any working crypto system 22:20:14 Do you mean the issue with nonconstructive proofs 22:20:15 ? 22:20:46 (I do not consider one-time pad to be working since it requires an infinitely long, secretly pre-shared key. And secretly sharing information is the very problem that cryptography tries to solve in the first place) 22:21:16 I mean there is not ANY mathematical proof for a working crypto system, wether constructive or non-constructive 22:21:50 Not a single one. Not in any of the past 80 years 22:22:00 You're talking about discrete log 22:22:01 Okay 22:22:06 I agree with you 22:22:14 What do you suggest for a solution? 22:22:18 I said I does not matter if you're using elliptic curves or discrete logs 22:22:27 Discrete log and ECDLP 22:22:31 There is no solution. Cryptography does not exist 22:23:13 What do we do then? 22:23:21 Don't know 22:23:31 Use seashells again!? 22:23:42 Yeah, I guess so 22:25:08 There's another solution: Simply not tell anyone 22:25:14 Since you were brought into existence and forced to participate in the society you're in, can you fathom using the 'currently best' *attempt* at a solution? 22:25:15 But since you've started talking about the truth ... 22:25:32 It was more of a joke 22:25:39 *Assuming you're forced to participate 22:25:44 I know. Sadly my answer wasn't 22:26:25 Well, I suggest you read "Industrial society and its futute", and then you think about for how long you want to stay part of this society 22:26:31 I've read it 22:26:38 I agree with your point in how cryptography represents a religion 22:26:47 Damn, this evening I'm a complete doomer, ruining the whole positive vibe. Sorry 22:27:03 I don't believe you are 22:27:50 Don't know. I can't imagine a positive future for humanity at the moment. So if we can't even think about how it could all work out in a positive way, then how should it ever happen? 22:28:24 Large corporations with AIs and the centralization of power really frighten me 22:28:36 Well, Camus pointed out the idea of "philosophical suicide", in which we take a "leap of faith" and accept the absurd 22:28:50 Well, Camus pointed out the idea of "philosophical suicide", in which we take a "leap of faith" and do not accept the absurd 22:29:16 All of philosophy is just mental masturbation to distract ourself from the fact that we're going to die and be forgotten 22:29:30 One being a means of existentialism: we create our own purpose in life 22:29:31 The other being the belief in a religion (there is inherent meaning to your life because you life for God and the afterlife) 22:29:56 I find religions absurd and childish 22:30:05 I don't disagree 22:30:49 Indeed, you have to find your own meaning in life. Life is a Kobajashi-Maru test. No matter what you do, you'll die in the end 22:31:06 I agree with Kaczynski in his anti-technology viewpoints 22:31:20 I acknowledge that and I use that as a means of enjoying the meaningless existence that we are in 22:31:25 My meaning is solving P vs NP. Find your own. Not my fault this will destroy all of cryptography 22:31:54 I live simply to acquire knowledge, hear the voices of others, and to live peacefully 22:32:00 I live simply to acquire knowledge, hear the voices of others, and to exist peacefully 22:32:16 Understood Juliu 22:32:29 The problem is that even Kaczynski had no answer what to do. His "back to the medieval ages" approach was just because he didn't know any better solution, as he wrote himself 22:32:54 I'm pretty sure we're in for a lot of trouble and misery soon 22:32:56 Yes, I agree with his anti-technology viewpoints but I disagree heavily with his solution 22:33:01 As always 22:33:25 I'm trying to appreciate the Now more lately 22:33:28 His solution assumes a meritocracy (all anarchist viewpoints do) 22:33:56 It's human nature to want to improve and to be curious. I think his approach won't work 22:34:21 But considering the average level of coherence and intelligence in the human population, an attempt at a 'society' that represents Ted's anarchist and environmentalist ideas doesn't seem to work 22:34:27 Along with what you said, it is human nature to improve 22:34:32 I haven't considered that before 22:34:35 Maybe transhumanism and changing our nature is the only solution. But that would probably only benefit rich people 22:35:03 Honestly I don't like his environmentalist idea 22:35:21 Please elaborate 22:35:44 I can't see a solution. So probably we're fucked. Maybe we should trust in god and let it happen ... But what if you're an atheist like me? Fuck! 22:36:03 Elaborate which part? 22:36:18 On what you think about his environmentalist ideas 22:36:42 I read it a few years ago so it is not fresh on my mind 22:36:43 I dont want to live like primitive cavemen where the strongest rules 22:37:04 Even thougn nowadays obviously also the strongest country rules. But not so much on a personal level 22:37:16 Right, it is more of an entity 22:37:17 Big Brother 22:38:11 Maybe Musk is right and the only solution is for humans to improve themselves to keep up with AI. But that would mean you'd be even more dependent on large corporations, which is suicidal 22:38:34 Unfortunately, the means of production is usually dominated by the most powerful entity 22:38:47 I should look more into decentralization and DAOs 22:38:51 The best you can do is create your own GPU farm 22:39:08 But it is hard as nvidia constantly iterates and releases large improvements 22:39:16 Well, seems I have to become the most powerful entity. That's the only solution 22:39:30 Start a fundraiser 22:39:41 That won't help 22:39:50 I just have to solve P vs NP. Can't be that hard 22:39:58 I'm sure you can get buy with $3.50 22:40:02 I'm sure you can get by with $3.50 22:40:17 Hm? I have a job to get by 22:40:30 I mean to become the most powerful entity 22:40:41 Unlike you guys in crypto, I'm not working for McDonalds 22:41:19 :-) I'm still in education 22:41:26 <3​21bob321:monero.social> but i get a name badge 22:41:32 Working, or getting "educated" ? 22:41:35 Some of us are hackers and work for tech companies 22:41:51 Well, waiting to graduate. 22:41:54 "Hackers" 22:42:03 Working as well on a startup 22:42:21 Hackers, not crackers http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/ 22:42:23 Im in a Hacker school 22:42:23 I didn't know that you just have to wait to graduate nowadays 22:42:30 I'll later become a professional hacker 22:42:38 Sure, dude 22:42:57 and my mom will be proud of me 22:42:59 Juliu, I don't find a large value in my current education. I am still forced to finish it regardless 22:43:11 My mom will never be proud of me, even if I cured cancer 22:43:34 LLm response: According to the Jargon File (catb), a hacker is someone who enjoys learning the details of a system and improving it or simply working around limitations. 22:43:35 Juliu that is both funny and sad, congratulations 22:43:46 Ye :/ I'm used to it 22:44:20 Did you know that hacking means pressing keys? 22:44:29 ain't no way 22:44:38 hm? 22:44:48 Hacking doesn't necessary entail the pressing of keys 22:44:58 Lockpicking in a sense can be considered hacking 22:44:59 It's where the word is coming from 22:45:19 You are using lockpicks and not keys, so you are not pressing keys 22:45:21 hacking = literally just typing 22:45:35 I mean keyboard keys, not what you think 22:45:51 I'm not pressing keys, Skyler. I. Am. The key. 22:46:02 Are you talking to Jarvis? 22:46:04 Hacking entails the pressing of keys 22:46:28 Not having to type would be neat 22:47:15 Hacker is generally used to mean: someone that enters computer systems in an unauthorized manner, usually with malicious intenet 22:47:19 Hacker is generally used to mean: someone that enters computer systems in an unauthorized manner, usually with malicious intent 22:47:29 This is not the definition that I am using when I say the word hacker 22:47:42 I know what a hacker is. I'm just talking about the origin of that word 22:48:04 Originates from "hack" from the 1300s I think, meaning to cut in a rough manner 22:49:24 Look at you, hacker. A pathetic creature of meat and bone, panting and sweating as you run through my corridors. How can you challenge a perfect, immortal machine? 22:50:03 Maybe I should print that on my pcbs 22:50:18 Maybe 22:50:35 I first saw that statement on a pcb 22:50:50 Somehow I always get the impression that people don't understand my references 22:51:01 It's from a game 22:51:04 I looked it up, it is from something else 22:51:06 Yes 22:51:19 I wanted to clarify that I first saw it somewhere else 22:51:32 Yes, from System Shock 2, I think. Maybe 1. Don't know 22:51:52 I wouldn't know, I don't play video games 22:52:01 Sad. You're missing out 22:52:24 I used to. But I would enjoy when playing with others 22:52:32 I don't have anyone to play with now 😄 22:52:37 Don't have the time either 22:52:51 I think multiplayer games are a waste of time, and they leave you with an empty feeling 22:53:06 "No time" is always an excuse 22:53:17 I was thinking that you would say that 22:53:27 I'm predictable :D 22:54:57 recanman, do you at least watch movies? 22:54:57 Something that is interesting: I did try playing a fast-paced game recently after stopping completely a few years ago, and I found myself shaking from the adrenaline after ~15min 22:55:13 Not in routine 22:55:15 Which game? 22:55:29 A shooter game, call of duty I think 22:55:42 Or fort nite 22:55:51 Recently is wrong, I stopped maybe 5 or six years ago, tried to play it two years ago 22:56:11 Or fortnite 22:57:11 Hm, ok 22:57:18 I don't like modern mainstream games 22:57:31 What do you recommend? 22:57:40 I'm curious what genre you deviate towards 22:59:01 I pretty much play all genres except for RPGs and strategy games 22:59:28 Well ok, also no sports games and no manager games 22:59:47 An example of a game you play? 23:00:04 Zelda - A Link to the Past. Best game ever made 23:00:38 I'll take a look at it but will not play it. Just curious what you're into 23:01:05 It's an old Super Nintendo game. Usually people know what Zelda is 23:02:03 I'm not well-socialized nor familiar with culture 23:02:14 I'm not well-socialized nor familiar with pop/video game culture 23:02:16 I also play stuff like Myst or like Resident Evil 2 Remake or like Portal 2. Just to give you an impression about different genres 23:02:29 Portal 2 I am familiar with 23:02:36 Okay, I understand 23:02:43 Nice. Game of the year 2012, if I remember correctly 23:02:46 Great game 23:02:51 Single-player games with a final goal and story 23:02:57 Yes 23:03:24 You don't know Myst? It had been the world's best-selling game for many years in the past 23:03:39 Haven't heard of it 23:03:40 (as far as I know) 23:03:47 I've heard the name "Resident Evil" but have no idea what it is 23:04:09 I don't really use social media or anything so I'm not up-to-date on the newest stuff 23:04:12 <3​21bob321:monero.social> wow 23:04:23 where am I and how did I get here? 23:04:39 There are so many different Resident Evil games now. Since Resident Evil 4 they went mostly towards action instead of atmosphere, which is sad. They used to be slow-paces, atmospheric survival horror games 23:04:48 nioCat, ask your mother 23:04:56 <3​21bob321:monero.social> nioc do you know alice 23:05:06 Good question 23:05:07 Who the fuck is Alice? 23:05:15 Bob and Alice, they always seem to be talking 23:05:23 mom is ded 23:05:24 I was referring a song 23:05:33 Eve always tries to eavesdrop 23:05:37 go ask alice, I think she knows 23:05:43 nioCat, well, then the answer to the mystery how you got here died with her 23:05:53 Oh, ok Julio 23:05:55 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob 23:06:09 I know where it is from, just making a joke 23:06:11 I guess it is Alice and Bob and not Bob and Alice 23:06:31 What about Charlie? 23:06:48 C is Cat 23:06:50 He bit my finger 23:07:02 The cat knows all the secrets anyway 23:07:32 nioCat how many cats do you have? 23:07:43 just 1 now 23:07:53 <3​21bob321:monero.social> from resident evil 23:07:58 What is his/her name? 23:08:00 If any 23:08:06 Or do you call 'em "cat" 23:08:11 <3​21bob321:monero.social> it* 23:08:16 There's a cat in Resident Evil? 23:08:28 referring to nioCat's cat 23:08:36 going out soon to take care of another one, 3x/day 23:08:42 <3​21bob321:monero.social> only dogs 23:08:42 Is his cat a zombie? 23:08:51 I call all cats boo boo lol 23:09:00 <3​21bob321:monero.social> https://residentevil.fandom.com/wiki/Zombie_Dog 23:09:04 Very interesting 23:09:09 Did you know Schrödinger had a dog and not a cat? 23:09:12 "boo boo" 23:09:18 Wasn't aware 23:09:28 I didn't know whether he had a cat 23:09:38 Apparently not 23:09:40 nice nickname 23:10:31 recanman, what are you studying? 23:10:56 Not able to declare a specific field currently 23:11:00 Will be able to soon 23:11:06 In which then I will declare computer science 23:11:21 ? 23:11:41 My secondary interest is Chemistry although I don't know if I will study that formally in a university 23:12:03 <3​21bob321:monero.social> can you make pagers? 23:12:16 0_o 23:12:19 Computer science is a scam. Computer scientists optimize easy problems slightly and are super proud of themselves. But the moment the problems get a bit harder, they start laughing hysterically and run away, pretending it can't be done without even trying 23:12:35 I don't have much interest in the theoretical 23:12:45 <3​21bob321:monero.social> ctrl alt defeat 23:12:53 I feel that your statement is too general 23:13:03 It's true 23:13:06 Juliu: what makes you think people havent tried 23:13:16 P vs NP is still not solved after how many years now? 23:13:42 well what makes you think people havent tried to figure it out 23:13:51 fmira, the fact that me meantioning that cryptography might be a hoax makes people angry instead of agreeing 23:14:12 They already accepted it without even trying 23:14:36 Whether there is active research currently or not I am not aware of 23:14:39 It's literally learned helplessness 23:14:59 so its the three-body problem also something that people gave up on? 23:15:09 or is it just something nobody could figure out 23:15:15 All that 99.99% of computer scientists do is "solve" already solved problems and ignore the unsolved ones 23:15:45 I understand what you're implying Juliu 23:15:59 fmira, there is no closed-form solution for the 3 body problem, as far as I know, and there's a proof for that 23:17:19 Unlike cryptography, which has no proofs 23:17:32 (because it's a hoax) 23:17:38 >which has no proofs 23:17:44 have you read any paper 23:17:50 It has proofs but it is built on a "faulty" assumption 23:18:10 An assumption that will most likely in my opinion never be broken 23:18:12 reading is a hoax 23:18:15 with classical computing 23:18:31 fmira, there is not a single proof for a working crypto system 23:18:58 Because DLP + ECDCLP do not have their "hardness" proven in certain contexts 23:19:04 recanman, I will break that assumption within my lifetime 23:19:08 Saying that all of cryptography is a hoax as a result of that connotes something different than that 23:19:25 It doesn't 23:19:30 One side of me would like to see the worldwide disaster if/when that happens 23:19:50 There's no disaster when you don't tell anyone 23:19:52 Both fmira and I understood a certain idea when you said that 23:19:59 Why not release it? 23:20:09 Why would anyone do something that stupid? 23:20:23 As you asserted before, life is meaningless 23:20:33 Maybe it's already broken and we just don't know 23:20:37 And therefore, this is just another random event in our random, meaningless existence 23:20:52 I never said that life is meaningless. I agreed that you have to assign your own meaning to it 23:21:05 Oops, sorry about that 23:21:07 define meaning 23:21:10 np 23:21:43 life is meaningless you say? then why can't I walk in two opposite direction at the same time? CHECKMATES ATHEIST 23:22:03 crispycat: definition accepted by most: inherent significance or philosophical meaning of living (or existence in general) <- wikipedia 23:22:18 Water is wet. Checkmate theists 23:22:27 lmao 23:22:39 tbh as far as ive understood if P=NP then AGI becomes significantly more achievable from what i heard which might be a bigger deal than all the crypto breaking 23:22:59 I would say crypto breaking is a much bigger deal 23:23:05 fmira, could be 23:23:15 proving P=NP doesn't particularly guarantee to help finding non polynomial algorithm. 23:23:18 Depends on how easy it is to break conventional systems 23:23:26 I would say that playing perfect Super Mario is the ultimate goal 23:23:41 Hedonism works for some 23:24:24 Have you made any progress in cracking them? I’m not being snide. 23:24:44 Why else would anyone do hard research? Fame? Bullshit. Achievements and medals? Cheap paper/metal so they don't have to give you real money. But playing videogames perfectly, that's something else! 23:24:49 i guess trying to work on the P/NP problem has the inherent problem that you could spend your whole life on it working on something where in the end P might not equal NP and that would suck 23:24:52 https://www.math.brown.edu/johsilve/Presentations/WyomingEllipticCurve.pdf 23:25:00 This is a good intro 23:25:12 Haha, yes fmira 23:25:37 hardhatter, I have the feeling that I'm making progress since 5 years, and I'm working on it since 5 years, but realistically speaking everying I try fails. Still 23:26:05 fmira, P is obviously equal to NP 23:26:13 how is it obvious? 23:26:41 define define (Jordan Peterson) 23:26:56 fmira, there's a black box. You can't see how it's operating inside. It has n binary inputs and 1 binary output. Only 1 input combination is valid. How many tries will you need on average to find it? 23:27:14 basses, go and make your bed and clean your room! 23:27:14 Easy, let n = 1, P = 1P, P = P by identity property 23:27:28 recanman, you forgot a case 23:27:40 bedtime story! 23:28:09 What's the case Juliu 23:28:29 recanman, P = NP <=> N = 1 or P = 0 23:28:41 You forgot the P = 0 case 23:29:08 I'm just joking, I'm not following the premise of the problem 23:29:17 fmira, are you still there? 23:29:31 recanman, and I wasn't joking? 23:29:40 Juliu: 2^n-1 right 23:30:00 Oh, sorry, didn't catch that 23:30:07 Yes, you're right Juliu 23:30:12 I wasn't looking to iterate on all solutions :-) 23:30:19 fmira, almost, but not quite. But since it's so close, let's say it's correct. So roughly speaking the same number of input combinations, right? 23:30:30 ya 23:30:51 I wouldn’t go as far to as all of CS is a scam but gosh hahah there’s a lot of people in CS that just assume something can’t be done without actually proving it. 23:31:33 Just like saying cryptography is a hoax, it is a very harsh statement, and without additional context, you come to assume a certain idea 23:31:43 fmira, ok. Now we make the box be made out of glass. You can see inside. You have an infinitely large (as a factor) information gain about what's going on inside. Believing that P != NP is equivalent to believing that making the box from glass does not bring us any significant benefit 23:31:48 I don't disagree with both ideas presented by Juliu 23:32:22 hardhatter, indeed 23:32:39 I wouldn’t go as far to say as all of CS is a scam but gosh hahah there’s a lot of people in CS that just assume something can’t be done without actually proving it. 23:33:02 recanman, Donald Knuth also believes that cryptography is a hoax. He said so in an interview ... indirectly ... with more polite words 23:33:28 Interesting, good to know 23:33:45 Knuth said that he believes P = NP 23:33:56 although I found his reasoning a bit strange 23:33:59 Using the word hoax directly without explaining what you intend to mean behind it gave me the impression that you had no idea what you were talking about 23:34:24 I say "hoax" instead of "scam" because I believe that it's note done intentionally 23:34:36 *not 23:35:30 fmira, can you understand what I mean? 23:36:16 Juliu: im not exactly sure if the "information gain" would in all cases make the problem more easily solvable in that analogy but i wonder if it could end up like Godel's incompleteness theorem where on the surface it sounds like its something that would be true but turns out to be not so simple in the end 23:36:28 To be fair I think a decent number of people in the crypto space acknowledge it’s just a practical method to achieve security and privacy until it eventually does get cracked 23:36:56 fmira, you think it makes no significant difference if we know how the box is evaluating our inputs or if we don't know? I think that's insane 23:38:04 well what if the way the box is evaluating inputs is so complex that its impossible to "predict" the correct output 23:38:09 To be fair I think a decent number of people in the crypto space acknowledge encryption is just a practical method to achieve security and privacy until it eventually does get cracked 23:39:04 fmira, Gödel's incompleteness theorem is actually quite easy. It's the same as the Halting problem and at least 2 other famous things in math. It is simply about having at least 1 case that contradics itself, so we can follow that it can't be done in general. It might still be doable for almost all cases though. But I don't see how that has anything to do with the black/glass box 23:40:04 fmira, yes, you are absolutely correct. It matters how complex the evaluation process of the box is. I left that out for simplicity reasons. But we know that the box does not take more than polynomially many steps to evaluate the inputs 23:41:38 oh okay that makes sense, sorry i havent actually looked at the P vs NP problem that much before but that clarifies things 23:41:46 hardhatter, sure, the real cryptographers do. But you have no idea how many channels banned me for telling the truth about it 23:41:55 I did not make the connection with Godel's incompleteness theorem before, thanks for explaining that Juliu 23:43:15 fmira, if the box would take longer to evaluate - like for example evaluating what the next perfect move is in a game of chess - we couldn't simply crack it in polynomial time since the checking itself is already way too complex. It's beyond P and NP, and there's even a proof that it is definitely harder 23:45:06 recanman, there's a Youtube video about category theory or something like that, that has those 4 things (Gödel, Halting, ...) as examples for different things that are actually all the same 23:45:21 Well when somebody cracks their favorite encryption protocols they’ll find out hahaha 23:45:41 Hardhatter, what do you mean? 23:47:32 When the people who just assume established encryption protocols can’t be cracked, eventually have those protocols get cracked they’ll find out they can infact be cracked 23:47:52 Juliu: i still dont see how you can know that all outputs can be reversible to the inputs in all cases even if the complexity to evaluate an input is in polynomial time 23:48:09 *that that can be done in polynomial time 23:48:17 Hardhatter, but how would they know if it's cracked or not? Maybe Bitcoin is long cracked and we just don't know it 23:49:06 fmira, the box only has 1 output. It's either zero/false if the input combination is wrong, or one/true if the input combination is the only correct combination 23:49:28 The box is pretty much just a password-checker, and there's only 1 valid password 23:50:12 Ohhh I was jokingly implying the cracker would also make it obvious that it’s been cracked by pwning everything. 23:50:13 But yea the cracker may never reveal that it’s been cracked 23:50:19 But shouldn't it matter a lot if you can or can't see how a password is evaluated??? 23:50:26 actually... hm.. if theres only one binary output it DOES feel like you can step backwards to find the answer 23:51:20 You can literally see how the box is doing the evaluation process when the box is transparent. And when the box is black you can't see it. And you think both are effectively equally hard??? 23:51:51 I consider that nuts. Which is why I am saying that it is obvious that P is equal to NP 23:52:07 im not saying the glass one is equally hard 23:52:40 But the belief that P != NP is equivalent to the belief that glas box and black box are roughly equally hard to crack 23:53:47 okay wait i think its clicked for me.. that WOULD be pretty weird actually huh 23:54:40 Brute force takes 2^n (= black box). The best known methods for solving a SAT problem (= where you can see 'inside') is not much faster, and will stay slow when P!=NP 23:55:06 So both are pretty much equally hard to solve? I call that nonsense 23:56:04 Seeing inside give us a hugh information benefit and hence should reduce the time to crack it not only by a little bit