00:42:53 Hey there everyone, what's up and how is the day treating ya'll? COFFEE? 00:43:28 <17lifers:matrix.org> mmm yes coffee *takes it* 00:44:30 yeah I am currently new and I wanted to get deep into #XMR so I thought I branch out of telegram into finding the community of monero elsewhere. Here I am. (^_^) 01:17:59 Hey I am finally here (^_^ m-relay 01:18:18 <17lifers:matrix.org> yes 01:18:20 This matrix is very well organized, I don't feel so windows 2000's 01:18:22 <17lifers:matrix.org> enjoy msg history 01:18:36 exactly that part THANK YOU 01:19:02 <17lifers:matrix.org> and look next to messages sent - read indicators 01:19:58 yeah most definitely. that's the bonus. I am trying to look for XMR defi 01:22:11 I wonder if matrix can connect OFTC IRC network? m-relay 01:25:42 Yea the bridge works better inOFTC 01:37:57 I am trying to connect to an OFTC public room #atropa_logged but can't seem to get to it. 02:21:51 are you trying to join via IRC or matrix 02:22:13 that looks like an IRC room descriptor 02:26:09 yeah it pretty much is, so we can't connect to oftc with matrix? 02:56:33 I have never been on matrix so.... 02:57:33 If there is a matrix equivalent room they might well be bridged 02:58:49 The monero feather wallet room is on OFTC and it is bridged between IRC and matrix 02:59:17 The IRC room is simply #feather 07:08:51 So it’s testnet and current blockchain can be left behind with 1.0 🤣 07:10:57 No, testnet is different 07:12:06 And technically, we leave behind the old blockchain at every hardfork 🫡 07:12:40 You don’t, you need those old tx history 07:13:27 even the garbage ones from the first few years are "forever" 07:13:42 Mainnet != stable 07:15:16 Mainnet has been mainnet since day 1, when ppl didnt know much abt the codebase (as we just took it and forked bytecoin) 07:35:17 So it’s not beta, it just has upgrades 09:32:17 <321bob321:monero.social> We havn't hit v1 yet ! 10:16:37 Might not reach in our lifetime 10:17:34 With fcmp are we doing 0.2? 10:32:22 <321bob321:monero.social> I doubt it, probably the next number 11:26:40 https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto Is this the reto version of haveno? 11:31:43 mesaoptimizer yes 12:22:30 0.19 at this pace 1.0 in a few centuries 13:28:58 0.19 is fcmp 13:29:27 1.0 discussed for sersphis fcmp 13:36:46 Sersphis 13:36:49 interesting 13:36:59 never heard of it 13:45:23 man oh man. these chat bots have finally allowed me to navigate git 13:53:55 Backdoor is work-in-progress 14:54:41 Lol you forgot quantum n other magical words which keep poping up every few years ; it will always be in beta for you 14:55:09 Lol. 15:01:13 https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/721 15:03:11 Old discussion 15:03:27 More recent one in mrl or nwlb 15:04:41 https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/316 even older one 18:00:04 Revuo Monero Issue 226: February 3 - 9, 2025. https://www.revuo-xmr.com/weekly/issue-226/ 18:23:48 Ohhhhh ok now I get why 0.9999 repeating doesn’t equal 1.0 19:19:34 If i have 10 subaddresses with 0.1 xmr on each, can i send 1 XMR in 1 transaction? 19:29:04 If they're from the same account, and you have another with a tiny bit more for the fee, then yes. 20:05:09 https://redlib.zaggy.nl/r/Monero/comments/1ij2sw6/cuprate_2024_progress_report/ why is cuprate significantly faster than the C++ codebase? 20:10:46 lack of legacy code? 20:24:59 mesaoptimizer, lack of technical debt + saner architecture, as well as great rust ecosystem crates. 20:26:36 interesting 20:26:55 would be great to compare Cuprate and Monerod's flame graph to see what part is actually more efficient 20:30:34 fede, I think it's not gonna be really helpful because the flamegraphs is gonna be awfully different 20:31:05 but you can try if you want, cuprated is in pre-alpha you can sync the blockchain now 20:31:18 HELLO PLOWSOF 20:32:15 was thinking of him just now , hello 20:34:24 apparently i've been analysing wallet code (qbit?) https://x.com/zerobounds/status/1887875903222345897?s=46 20:36:13 dw you are just sleepwalking 20:36:26 you don't realize it but you actually analyzed cake wallet during the night 20:38:36 mind sharing your analysis? 20:40:47 no idea why i've been referenced or dragged into being excited about cake. likely related to the bounty https://bounties.monero.social/posts/150/1-062m-cake-wallet-reproducible-build-support where someone from walletscrutiny iirc had some diffs 20:46:22 LLM has learned to just blame plowsof 20:46:48 it works fine when complied with non of their APIs, right? 20:47:09 someone *trusted* could start their own non bloated fork 20:47:19 of cakewallet 20:47:27 tqwera dockerised it iirc while working on that bounty 20:47:55 cool 20:55:23 why does getmonero site close connection when i try to wget the blockchain.raw file 20:59:36 I bet that blockchain raw file is from years ago 20:59:57 it should just be removed at this point 21:03:52 PR to remove it is here https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2241 21:05:52 getmonero even says "Especially, don't use it with any blockchain you download from the Internet" i mean come on man 21:06:32 thank you selsta 21:22:54 You are me 21:23:32 I posted recently the differences between cake and web rates, which == 1.5-2.5 % 22:39:54 we are us 22:48:58 so then what am i supposed to do to get the blockchain, the client is just repeating 22:49:00 ``` 22:49:02 2025-02-09 22:47:06.492 I SYNCHRONIZATION started 22:49:04 2025-02-09 22:47:10.762 I [198.16.179.223:18080 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 1492064 -> 3344156 [Your node is 1852092 blocks (7.0 years) behind] 22:49:06 2025-02-09 22:47:10.762 I SYNCHRONIZATION started 22:49:08 2025-02-09 22:47:23.139 I [185.218.124.120:18080 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 1492064 -> 3344156 [Your node is 1852092 blocks (7.0 years) behind] 22:49:10 2025-02-09 22:47:23.140 I SYNCHRONIZATION started 22:49:12 2025-02-09 22:47:39.715 I [152.169.161.37:18080 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 1492064 -> 3344157 [Your node is 1852093 blocks (7.0 years) behind] 22:49:14 2025-02-09 22:47:39.715 I SYNCHRONIZATION started 22:49:16 2025-02-09 22:48:12.228 I [152.169.161.37:18080 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 1492064 -> 3344157 [Your node is 1852093 blocks (7.0 years) behind] 22:49:18 2025-02-09 22:48:12.228 I SYNCHRONIZATION started 22:49:20 and that number has not changed 22:49:22 1492064 22:50:19 `2025-02-09 22:50:01.830 W There were 0 blocks in the last 90 minutes, there might be large hash rate changes, or we might be partitioned, cut off from the Monero network or under attack, or your computer's time is off. Or it could be just sheer bad luck.` 23:00:48 have you tried turning it off and on again? 23:01:03 it actually helps sometimes 23:01:23 exit will save your progress 23:01:25 Probably connected to asshole nodes, enable ban list and you should sync fine. 23:02:20 ban list shouldn't matter 23:02:56 It does, it your are connected to dishonest nodes which will feed you bad data and you can’t finish sync 23:03:27 AIUI that is not what those nodes are doing 23:03:47 but ban list can only help overall 23:03:52 There are all kinds of of nodes, you are referring to proxy nodes 23:04:38 if all the nodes he is connecting to are bad, turning it off and on again works :D 23:05:35 Just add https://github.com/rblaine95/monero-banlist and worry less 23:05:42 having the sync stop has happened to me a couple of times and the brain ded solution worked :) 23:06:11 Next time start with ban list and it won’t stop 23:06:22 maybe 23:06:48 again using the ban list is a good idea 23:15:40 anyone elses seed nodes not being stable? 23:24:01 gingeropolous im using current release branch, all seems fine (9days uptime currently) 23:24:48 huh. i think i need to make some fancy fail2ban things that just only allow ips to connect like 5x or something 23:25:07 some are offline though https://github.com/plowsof/check-monero-seed-nodes 23:25:25 im running release now and i still can't get stability 23:37:49 Hello 23:38:26 What is the best atomic swap solution to go from btc to xmr? 23:41:03 citizenseven7: probably basicswap