06:15:13 Hello, would you recommend running a Monero node and a web application with wallet-cli on separate servers? 06:36:38 What webapp? 06:49:53 you mean at home? 06:50:52 i run gui wallet on my day-to-day machine and have the node on my server and it syncs really quickly over LAN if that is what you are asking 06:54:17 a webapp using monero 06:54:33 a webapp which use monero 06:57:15 No I mean If you have a webapplication that uses wallet-cli that uses monero node, you can put everthing on the same machine or seperate the web app, the wallet-cli and the monero node 06:58:07 Hello, would you recommend running a Monero node and a web application with wallet-rpc on separate servers? 06:58:13 No I mean If you have a webapplication that uses wallet-rpc that uses monero node, you can put everthing on the same machine or seperate the web app, the wallet-cli and the monero node 06:58:22 you can use RPC to connect the wallet-cli to a remote node 06:58:32 but using a node on the same server is going to be more reliable 06:59:05 but using a node on the same server is going to be slightly more reliable 06:59:37 https://docs.getmonero.org/rpc-library/wallet-rpc/ 06:59:39 There no big benefit of separating the monero node ? 06:59:49 why would there be? 07:04:17 Maybe security that I am not aware of idk or If it's on the same server the webapp load will impact the monero daemon 07:22:29 correct 07:22:55 basically, if the other server is close by, it makes sense to run it on a second server if you can 07:23:28 but if you only expect slight load, on the same machine is probably a little easier to set up 07:31:13 ok, and it makes sense to run the wallet-rpc on the same server as the monero node ? 07:52:58 Depends on your use case 07:55:12 it really doesnt matter where you put them, aside from your security needs 07:56:14 The node being local ensures no MITM possible 07:56:14 the wallet being local ensures no MITM possible 07:56:16 The webapp being local ensutes it can communicate with the wallet, again, with no MITM 07:56:57 But if the wallet holds funds, and the server that monerod or the webapp are on isnt secure, then you're putting your funds at risk 08:21:04 yes for sure, make the server with monerod accessible only from webapp server etc etc 08:21:04 Otherwise, for the MITM, if I put everything on the same server at some point for scaling purposes I will need to separate 08:33:49 You will probably have to do a lot of "scaling" until you run into problems if nothing else than Monero stuff is running on that box. 10:01:10 hi,i was banned from #monero-pools 10:01:26 anyone here ? 10:01:33 Everyone was. 10:02:04 AFAIK it was a hive of assholes and libera.chat kicked the channel off their servers. 10:04:17 Budy,where be found #monero-pools 10:04:21 *bigoted arseholes 10:04:35 monero-pools is now on Rizon 10:05:54 U a good man 10:06:41 With or without those bigots? 10:09:33 I'am a newer to monero,i just want a good xmr mine pool.any ideas ? 10:16:57 https://p2pool.io/#pool You will probably lose money, except if you have basically free energy, but you will help the network :) 10:18:48 free energy ? yeah,it's free 10:19:09 Lucky you 10:32:17 yeah 11:53:00 it'd be "fun" to calculate what the blockchain would be with the OG borromean sigs 12:01:05 boog900: sent you a dm. 12:02:37 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Its funny how you have to tell people that you sent them dms. Turn the notifications on ! 12:03:18 u using matrix sir 12:05:08 Notifications don't mean shit when your client is not running at the moment lol 16:39:09 Nothing special, just sending transactions. 0.18.3.4-release (Qt 5.15.16). No, i didnt try another node. The node, that im using must be ok, because its my own node, but on vps 16:53:53 What os 16:54:07 (that gui runs on) 16:54:09 linux 16:56:20 segfault occurred when i was trying to close wallet and only once, so its now huge problem. More annoying is the problem with transactions 16:58:22 segfault occurred when i was trying to close wallet and only once, so its not huge problem. More annoying is the problem with transactions 17:14:32 More info needed 18:11:13 Ok, i sent transactions. Explorers shows 8 confirmations, but wallets says that transaction still pending. How i can extract more information? 18:14:07 Nothing special in logs. As always `"Passing incompatible arguments to C++ functions from JavaScript is dangerous and deprecated."` 18:14:12 It may sound dumb, but first I would do is just restart the wallet. Maybe it lost connection to the daemon somehow and did not catch the tx getting mined, and after a restart it gets on its feet again 18:17:00 Ok, now transaction marked as failed. But it will be marked as needed after explicit `Scan transaction`. But i dont want do it after every transaction. Usually, next transactions fails with `Double spend error` 18:18:21 "marked as needed" I don't understand. That doesn't sound like the usual terminology regarding Monero wallets. What are you working with? 18:18:35 have you tried restoring wallet from height 0? 18:18:43 I mean i will be marked confirmed 18:18:55 Ah, ok 18:19:11 Explicit scanning fix incorrect state of transaction 18:19:41 What wallet allows you manually ask to scan a particular tx? 18:19:47 Explicit scanning fixes incorrect state of transaction 18:20:09 Default monero wallet gui 18:20:37 Every day learning something new ... 18:22:03 Maybe the daemon you use is a bit wonky? I think the GUI wallet usually is pretty reliable, it just uses standard wallet2 inside 18:26:54 Daemon is almost default. Built from woodser/monero sources. Im using i2p tunnel to daemon, but i dont understand how does this affect anything. 18:30:38 oh, no 18:33:09 monerod completely default 18:33:32 just executables from official webisite 18:33:42 just executables from official website