00:00:37 <m-relay> <3​21bob321:monero.social> open alias just resolves the address ?
00:01:14 <m-relay> <3​21bob321:monero.social> i assume the wallet uses local dns resolver ?
00:35:53 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> No
00:36:23 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> i believe so
00:37:59 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> No, the node doesn't do any resolution,  only the wallet does
00:41:28 <m-relay> <p​olytheistic:matrix.org> I don't get the difference between the hats :/
05:02:05 <m-relay> <f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please get in touch via our usual method to get me know it's you. 🙂
05:07:17 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Yes
05:10:34 <m-relay> <f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please let in touch via our usual method to get me know it's you. 🙂
05:16:42 <m-relay> <f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> Who are you saying yes to?
06:32:32 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> You
09:12:50 <m-relay> <f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> Well, you have AI in your name, so (with all due respect) I don't know if I can trust your "information"
09:14:35 <m-relay> <f​reedom-quester:matrix.org> xenu: Hi, are you the same person as Xenu from antimoonboy.com, if so please get in touch via our usual method to let me know it's you. 🙂
09:36:23 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> Guys
09:36:23 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> Rather than not allowing us to initiate a tx with unconfirmed funds, could we not have a separate mempool for tx with unconfirmed funds inputs? They would stay there for 20 minutes and then go to the actual mempool when confirmed.
09:36:25 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> If I know that I want to initiate a tx with my coming funds, I should be able to do so. Even if it's accepted later.
09:36:27 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> I should not have to wait 20 minutes to do the action later. A lot of things can happen in 20 minutes and I might be prevented from waiting or signing the tx later
09:40:49 <m-relay> <e​inliterflasche2:matrix.org> The point of the 10 block lock is to make it harder to spot the real inputs of a transaction. If not for the 10 block limit, then people would directly spend the UTXO, which would provide a good heuristic for chain analysis. It
09:40:51 <m-relay> <e​inliterflasche2:matrix.org> It would compromise privacy. Being able to publish transactions spending unconfirmed funds directly, even if they're not would compromise privacy in the same way. I think.
09:42:41 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> So there is hope to lower the 10 block limit with the upcoming FCMP++ update ?
09:42:43 <m-relay> <a​mmortel:monero.social> Since there will be no more possible analysis of UTXO
10:12:47 <m-relay> <k​evino:tchncs.de> I don't think there are any proposals for that