01:24:12 thank you, thought so as well and had a wallet prepared 02:45:52 Fee (per_kB): 0.000278520000 02:49:30 Just need gupaxx 03:35:29 Guys can we start creating memecoins and merge mine them to Monero ? 03:35:44 Why don’t we have a moneroChan memecoin?? 03:36:28 Look at Tari what happens when botnets play 03:37:48 The problem with tari is that it was supposed to solve problems that don’t exist 03:38:11 A memecoin exist only for ngu 04:02:00 We had wownero and it didn’t work out, we can’t even have ngu on xmr; shilling a meme coin is unimaginable 04:02:20 Don’t buy Monero is a real ethos of monero community 04:21:41 I’m say this and I’m gonna go sleep, we should thank the qubitards bacouse they raised a problem that has always been present, and it has given us the oppurtunity to have import discussions that maybe we would have had too late 04:34:52 There's a severe vulnerability in synapse, it's advised to quickly upgrade the room: https://matrix.org/blog/2025/08/security-release/ 04:35:27 Hi i want to transact crypto without trace 04:36:32 How 04:36:53 Considering you ask then you already technically leaving traces. 04:36:55 Monero is private but it all depend where you come from (other coins, exchange, etc, etc) 04:36:57 And leaving details of them hmmm 04:37:49 What, they said monero can help you to transact without trace 04:38:04 Yes, it does, just using monero, as simple as that 04:38:28 Where is monero 04:38:38 Yeah, that is your issue right? You don't know where to obtain them? 04:38:49 Yes 04:38:57 If you have internet connection everywhere 04:39:20 The basics are using your own onion node and transacting monero. To buy some, use retroswap. 04:39:26 Isn't monero an exchange giving you wallets? 04:39:43 or things like unstoppable swap assuing you already have bitcoin 04:39:52 The easy way to buy Monero is install cakewallet and swap whatever currency to monero 04:39:53 Read the docs first before asking things. 04:40:01 no 04:40:08 you can use a wallet, ideally listed on getmonero.org 04:40:28 Monero GUI or Featherwallet are the one I recommand (on PC) 04:40:55 On mobile 04:41:02 https://www.getmonero.org/downloads/#gui 04:41:03 https://featherwallet.org/ 04:41:12 chatgpt can even answer your question 04:41:49 So monero is an untraceable currency not a wallet 04:42:01 on mobile you have Cake Wallet, Stack, and Monerujo 04:42:09 Yes, monero is the currency, you have many wallet options 04:42:52 I would trust qwen better, use less ressources 👨‍👩‍👦 04:43:01 I would trust qwen better, use less ressources 😂 04:44:25 So first i should buy a crypto like trx and swap it with monero and then get it in my own local wallet to have real cash 04:44:57 What are the exact stepts to be annynamous 04:46:52 Lol forget about my qwen comment, at least the 14B mobiles I just ran local, it's garbage 😂 04:46:55 Anonymity is not black and white. You need patience and discipline to follow extreme isolation. 04:47:03 Lol forget about my qwen comment, at least the 14B modele I just ran local, it's garbage 😂 04:47:31 llama 7B is fine. 04:48:31 Qwen3 14B, in order, recomanded Monero Mobile (Official), MyMonero, Monero Wallet (Mobile) by Monero Project, Hardware Wallet Integration, XMRWallet 04:48:34 Checsum help me goverment is looking for me cuase im a fisher 04:49:14 I have installed cake wallet chosen cake wallet 04:51:38 I have installed cake wallet chosen monero currency 05:17:11 Just seen in the console log of one of my daemons, happened a few hours ago: a 7-block reorg 05:17:55 7 and a 6 05:23:07 Monerobull has the info and the picture, without that it did not happen after all :) https://x.com/monerobull/status/1955044886232666202?t=gAaD5ziFnlAjEDIWUh7BSw 05:46:04 a question. If a tx was originally included in the xmr chain, but the attacker orphaned the chain, when the tx has not yet entered into the new chain, at this time, can the tx sender increase the fee to double spend the money?such as sending the money back to his own address? 05:52:33 Pretty sure the answer is "no". Even in this orphaning scenario every attempt to spend the same enotes again, with different fee or destination, will just get refused as a double spend attempt by the network. 05:56:11 Right. Monero doesnt have rbf 05:56:38 Only if they orphaned 10+ blocks and previous tx becomes invalid 05:56:58 The tx would still be in the pool iirc 05:57:31 Wouldn’t that be an invalid tx ? And drops after 48hrs? 05:57:52 Does a 10 block reorg actually invalidate the tx? Or only if it referenced a decoy from the 11th block? 06:00:01 Referenced decoy from 11th block 06:01:39 Soon exchanges/vendors will need 100+ conf then 1000+ conf 😅 06:01:57 /s 06:05:08 Its not rrslly /s. tradeogre had like 80-100 confs for wownero 06:05:18 Wownero block time is 5min 06:05:51 And kraken had like 30 confs for bch 06:06:14 I added /s on purpose 06:06:37 Yeah, but it's not sarcasm 06:06:47 I know 06:06:50 Its a realistic outcome 06:07:08 We are going there along with cheaper price to miner monero 06:07:11 Happy mining 06:07:46 We are going there along with cheaper price to mine monero 06:08:36 GF can be used to buy hardware when gf fund value is a fraction 06:08:44 🚀 06:09:37 Didn’t expect xmr was this shitty n prone to attack, there will never be a bottom to xmrbtc pair 06:10:07 Don’t buy monero was real, should have listened to fluffy 06:13:29 Thanks for your reply. That is to say, even if a tx is still in mempool, another tx with the same keyimage will be rejected when entering mempool. Am i right? 06:13:49 Yes 06:39:19 monerobros is it over 06:41:23 No bounties on qubic ? I thought it was used on dark nets lol 06:41:39 Yes, it’s over 06:42:07 Ppl on X have confirmed attack without any knowledge 06:42:11 So it must be real 06:42:23 Ppl on X have confirmed 51% attack without any knowledge 06:47:51 psyops 06:49:56 Always has been but it’s real 06:55:34 curry guo, [Aug 12, 2025 at 14:44:31]: 06:55:35 When broadcasting a transaction, it reports 'Failed to commit tx.' Could you please help check it? 06:55:37 The logs show a 'Double spend' error, which used to occur rarely but has become more frequent in the past two days. 06:55:42 When broadcasting a transaction, it reports 'Failed to commit tx.' Could you please help check it? 06:55:43 The logs show a 'Double spend' error, which used to occur rarely but has become more frequent in the past two days. 06:57:52 It means the node that you sent the tx to, has already seem the transaction 06:59:05 you can a) try a different node or b) see if the tx has been confirmed 07:00:41 I get the general idea. What can I do to prevent this problem from occurring again? 07:01:54 Use localnode 07:03:07 Currently, I am using a local node 07:11:55 How did you run into this problem? 07:14:02 The error just means that the tx has already been sent. Did you try to send the same tx twice? 07:15:29 No, it should be that the later constructed transaction used an unspent output that has already been spent. 07:16:12 But what's strange is that I don't manage the outputs myself; the node selects the outputs automatically. So why would there still be duplicates? 07:17:01 The wallet selects the outputs. Are you using monero-gui? 07:18:49 No, I'm using the node's RPC . 07:19:31 monero-wallet-rpc 07:32:56 Hm. Strange 07:33:32 Wallet rpc should sync properly, pickup the transaction and stop trying to re-use the key image 07:35:17 Has the node been updated recently? I rarely encountered this issue before, but it has been happening more frequently lately. 07:35:28 Did the tx fail? Still not confirmed? 07:35:29 2 options: a) flush_txpool on the node, then resubmit the tx, or b) resync the wallet 07:35:31 If you know the txid, you can look it up on a block explorer to see if it is a) confirmed b) unknown 07:36:05 Are you using any flags like --tx-proxy? 07:36:57 If so, poor tor connectivity will cause the tx to get stuck. 07:37:09 The transaction is unknown on the block explorer. 07:37:51 then its likely stuck in your nodes txpool due to connectivity. Do you use tx-proxy? 07:38:43 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/WgoUvKynOLbeJmAysQdHmLvE 07:39:37 No, I don’t have the tx-proxy parameter and I’m not using it. 07:41:15 I misunderstood; tx-proxy is not enabled. 07:41:19 tx-proxy is a parameter on monerod 07:41:52 A flag, like `--tx-proxy=tor,127.0.0.1:9050` 07:42:14 This can cause tx relay issues if tor cannot connect to onion addresses 07:42:54 Is this the node startup command? 07:48:02 Is this the node startup command? 07:48:27 /root/monero/monerod --hide-my-port --non-interactive --confirm-external-bind 07:54:25 Strange that your node did not relay the tx. since it doesnt appear on block explorers, it likely hasnt left your computer. You can try to flush the txpool and re-send the tx, or connect to a different node and resend 07:54:43 I havent had this issue and i use wallet-rpc pretty heavily 07:56:44 The key image of this transaction has already been spent, so it should not be broadcasted again. 07:57:22 I mainly want to ask, why is a key image that has already been spent being spent again? 07:58:08 Rescan your wallet 07:58:20 If the txid isnt available on an explorer, it hasnt really been spent 07:58:33 Ot means your wallet is unaware of the spend 08:00:24 Which block explorer are you referring to? Please send me a link. There are two explorers—one shows 'unknown' and the other shows 'pending'. 08:03:52 xmrchain.net 08:04:33 https://localmonero.co/blocks/ 08:05:03 If it shows pending, then it has been sent and your wallet or node is likely not in sync 08:06:33 can `refresh` the wallet, it might pick up the tx, or connect it to a different node. If both of those fail, you might need to rescan the wallet, unfortunately 08:09:49 Nothing found. 09:36:53 hello, im new here, are there any rules to read in this channel? 09:38:04 dont spam, no off-topic, thats basically it 09:40:13 okay, got it :) ive been using monero for a while but am a bit out of the loop, are there any good technical write ups about the qubic situation? it seems to be hard to find any concrete information about the technicalities of whats going on 09:41:21 i just approved a post mentioning savemonero.info on reddit 09:41:30 closest ive seen to a writeup 09:42:09 tldr: go to gupax.io and start mining to p2pool if you want to help 09:43:42 sounds good, thank you for the info 10:24:02 the hacker who stole over 300m in btc seems to have strategically timed their sale to coincide with the current qubic frenzy (which is essentially inconsequential, as reorgs are rare and generally do not warrant concern; many people lack understanding of possion distributions, let alone mining). the pirice will likely stop dropping around 220s, which was the price before the hacke 10:24:03 r started "laundering" (reposted from #monero-markets:monero.social) 10:27:31 monero mining is not perfect and can be considered centralized; however, this issue also applies to Bitcoin, which has pools with over 25%+ of the hash rate despite using ASICs. game theory suggests that miners will act rationally because it benefits them financially. the PoS finality layer idea proposed as an improvement to mining is intriguing, but there's no serious threat of a 10:27:33 n attack and this "threat" will likely stop when qubic emissions halve in ~10 days. the current sell-off is due to the hacker offloading their holdings on mexc 10:29:16 A lot of the talk is about if Qubic can do this, could another attack, perhaps a government, also try the attack, perhaps more successfully? 10:32:02 qubic can't sustain an attack on the network, although a government could against Monero. Bitcoin is also vulnerable since the largest pools (such as foundry) are based in the US, with their equipment stored in warehouses that can be easily seized 10:33:27 specifically, the largest mining operations, such as riot, which collaborate with foundry, operate their facilities in centralized locations 10:34:23 I find it surprising that qubic hysteria gained such widespread popularity, even among reputable auditors like Slowmist. did people forget about the 300m so quickly? 10:36:55 "monero is broken" gets clicks 10:37:28 Actually Slowmist focuses more on eth 10:37:43 bitcoin maxis want to see it fail, many other people are screwed if it fails 10:41:55 I know, but they posted that Monero has successfully been 51% attacked here: 10:41:57 https://xcancel.com/SlowMist_Team/status/1955209185718833665 10:41:59 the source? orangefren, a Monero community member, who misinterpreted a 6-block reorg as a 51% attack. as slowmist is reputable, this misinterpretation may now spread far beyond the Monero community. the positive is that this opens an opportunity to make money while others have insufficient information about the actual implications of these events 10:43:29 bitcoin maxis are idiots who don't realize Bitcoin is also vulnerable to this threat 10:44:14 I’ve had contact with SlowMist at work, and they are indeed good experts in ETH smart contracts, but not in BTC 10:44:35 I suppose they aren’t in Monero either. 10:46:55 In pow environments, the biggest chain is the least vulnerable to it. 10:46:55 Also knowing the positions banks and other big orgs hold in it, gives some strong incentives from folks with big bags to keep consensus. 10:47:41 At least for mid term 10:48:26 oh wow 11:02:39 xmpp chat vs irc chat 11:03:52 yes, with each bitcoin halving, it's clear that emissions alone may not sustain the network indefinitely. all PoW chains possess inherent weaknesses, which can be improved. monero concerns are overblown though 11:04:57 the issue with slowmist recognizing this (even though they are not experts in Monero) is that many well-respected crypto news outlets rely on them as a credible source. misinformation may continue to spread even more widely 11:09:49 done 11:10:37 good 11:10:53 Some of these crypto magazines are really really bad, but writing qubic advertising as if it's facts. It's total BS 11:11:02 Some of these crypto magazines are really really bad, writing qubic advertising as if it's facts. It's total BS 11:11:32 The 15 million TPS just makes me wonder if these crypto journalist actually understand crypto 🤷‍♂️ 11:12:29 The sad storey at the end of the day is that the majority is there for the money not for the technology… 11:12:31 The sad story at the end of the day is that the majority is there for the money not for the technology… 11:12:34 in 2017 a lot of FUD happened also last year with chainalaysis 11:12:52 not true 11:13:15 are there any available resources that provide detailed information about the fcmp++ alpha stressnet? 11:13:17 if that was true, then Monero was going to be like other shitcoin (Qubic) etc 11:13:29 or cucked zcash 11:13:31 Good point 11:13:52 the 15 million TPS is only because qubic is not actually decentralized 11:13:59 it's a centralized "blockchain" 11:14:27 But how can you even prove it if you're not handling 15 million transactions in a day 11:15:56 hosting a qubic node is a herculean task, which requires 2 TB of RAM, UEFI (because the node program has to run at the UEFI-level?), contract/universe/spectrum files that you have to get at their discord, etc. etc. etc. 11:16:12 which makes me think if they intentionally make it hard to justify why it's centralized 11:16:51 blockreward: To my knowledge, no. I don't think it is quite ready yet (but soon, hopefully). I've been trying to keep up with the various weekly meetings but I don't remember what was last said about the stressnet. The best resource to look would be the meeting logs, which are archived here: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aclosed 11:16:51 Or maybe someone closer to the action than myself will chime in here. 11:17:45 If it is like the last stressnet I imagine they will post very publicly about how to join it once it is ready. 11:48:28 whats the aftermath of the 51% attack, just business as usual? 11:54:57 There was no 51% but there has been a lot of discussion on preventative measures in Monero Research Lounge and Monero Research Lab 11:54:58 the chainalysis fud was warranted, but the fud surrounding qubic is unfounded. their achievement of a maximum of 7-block reorg so far does != 51% attack on the network. in the past, bitcoin has experienced around 30 orphaned blocks in a row after the 2013 fork, and the network remains stable. in order for an attack to be considered serious, qubic would need to sustain far more tha 11:54:59 n their current 17% hash rate of 0.85 GH/s. they would have to increase their hash rate by approximately 3.48 GH/s (which is around 4x their current hashrate and assuming no other pools increase) for there to be an actual attack 11:55:59 there was no 51% attack, and it's business as usual. however, you may have experienced delays if you sent transactions during periods when qubic was printing orphaned blocks 12:01:45 why did orangefren say it was succesful lol 12:02:11 "appears to be successful" 12:03:46 qubic bots on X have been spreading false information suggesting that the monero network has been 51% attacked. orangefren probably fell for the bait or is engagement farming themselves 12:04:38 if it was 51% attacked, then transactions would not go through at all 12:04:52 since that was CFB's plan... isn't it? 12:07:29 If it was 51% they can mine every block 12:07:43 Not just 51/100 12:08:33 i would expect the whole blockchain to completely halt 12:08:43 not a mere inconvenience 12:09:08 boog900: exactly, they could just orphan others who tried 12:11:48 doesn't that make miners want to stop as they already achieved what they falsely want (51% attack?) 12:12:23 they already falsely achieved what they falsely wanted 12:12:55 all they've done is caused re-orgs, which are things that happen on PoW chains. 12:13:45