06:49:14 Has anybody tried something like Cake Wallet on Linux Mobile or Ubuntu Touch? If Google wins this app developer registration war, either Android is going to need to be completely forked away from upstream, or it's going to have to be abandoned in favor of Linux mobile. Being under Google's thumb is not an option. 07:10:32 Linux mobile is way behind , don't bother with it 07:14:53 @kevino:tchncs.de: That's a very defeatist attitude that will lead to us all being in virtual chains. 07:15:43 Forking android is a better solution than building something from scratch 07:16:05 If you don't realise it requires a hello lot of investment to create a new OS 07:18:16 @kevino:tchncs.de: I see this as the better path forward of myself. 07:18:16 I think having a corporation behind Android has gotten us used to things like yearly updates and shit like that, which aren't necessarily needed. What's needed is to keep up with security patches. But if the pace of actual development slows to what the community can handle, I don't see a problem with that. 07:21:08 Things like lineage and graphene may very well become operating systems in their own right, instead of just operating systems in name only, as they are today. 07:22:17 The only reason they are called OS today is because you're not allowed to use the Android because it's a trademark. 07:25:39 @kevino:tchncs.de: postmarketOS has been doing pretty well for what it is 19:28:27 i'm surprised CCS hasn't gotten more AI proposals as it is 19:28:31 it has only gotten like 2? 19:28:38 plowsof: how many? 19:29:27 Cindy: u are checking issues? 19:29:33 last time I did it was full of spam bots 19:56:16 Tons 19:57:30 <321bob321> We use rspamd 20:58:45 Can we declare qubic almost dead? seems they have lost the momentum 21:03:16 Is the checkpointing still needed even.. ? 21:06:08 If the price pumps, which it might since they're angling to try and get onto more exchanges, then hashrate might well go back. I wouldn't discount them yet, they're still openly antagonistic and bragging about the reorgs. 21:07:25 sigh.. 21:08:39 They'll most definitely be trying new things until something else sticks, yeah 21:12:48 Why would any serious exchange want to list such a shitcoin 21:14:04 It doens't look good for them, trading 40% below initial value 21:16:07 According to them, so massive grain of salt and all that, they're paying an unnamed American exchange ~300k to get listed and they're running a campaign with monetary rewards to try and get 5k people to sign up to OKX through their referral links. 21:16:40 Whether either will be successful or not is another story. 21:17:34 Even if they get listed, that doesn't mean people are going to buy their crap? 21:18:39 with or without the cubists it is still an issue that should be dealt with 21:19:23 hmm 5 more days it seems, on OKX's website 21:21:03 nioc: yeah I agree, all for preventing shenanigans like this in the future 21:22:16 That qubic x okx is strange. Users need to sign up, deposit 50 USDT and potentially get 120$ value of BTC. No word about getting qubic .. 21:22:34 @eddie:oblak.be: Last numbers they provided, so again, grain of salt, were 2185/5000 21:22:53 So it's not going too well, even when they're literally paying people to do it, lmao. 21:23:57 Not surprised, those 2000+ sign ups a prolly mostly bots 21:27:55 probably paying in Qubic, and they probably don't want much of that anymore eh 21:29:13 remember the AI prompt spammer people? :D 21:29:25 the "new aigarth prompt dropped" ones 21:30:24 The #qubic-warriors aren't getting paid enough to fuck with us anymore 😔 21:31:52 It's terrible because it means we see less of your messages 21:34:17 It was simply too much fun saying obtuse bullshit they have to translate through an LLM and watching them try to reply. 21:34:58 It's a shame they don't have much humor really because it was indeed pretty funny 21:41:42 is p2pool mini finding 3 blocks within last 4 hours just a demonstration of probability at work or something else? 21:42:27 Did the hashrate jump? 21:44:08 it happens 21:44:17 also the first of those 3 blocks was like 500+% effort 21:44:34 https://mini.p2pool.observer/blocks 21:56:10 the hashrate is stable. Is effort always a relative number, like in relative to effort spent when finding previous block(s)? the same as in effort to find a share on the pool's sidechain, if I understand it correctly 22:10:00 @seen variance 23:53:14 There are only TWO i2p ravfx nodes 23:53:14 * ravfxmrg42nts5q65c33gyvs4gpb5n3a3wzzx3w2bes2hbkakfsa.b32.i2p:18081 23:53:15 * ravfxmresnvpybolnczn7wsju55c6jej3vo5hrnvcypugrdy4u6q.b32.i2p:18089 23:53:15 [... more lines follow, see https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/ueyqtLoKaldGMzN2 ] 23:53:16 https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/xmr.mx/BTazTdsCOAtxEfLdWwSJKOte.png (clipboard.png) 23:56:49 Wait, that site is too slow and only searched for "ravf". 23:56:49 Probably nothing then... Ravfk did look very similar to ravfx