00:00:59 already port forwarded to the correct address, I guess it just need to finish syncing before I can say there is a problem. Thanks for the reply 00:37:40 .p btc 00:37:40 Bitcoin ==> [Price] 65895$ , [HIGH24H] 68309$ , [LOW24H] 65243$ , [%24h] -2.26% , [%7d] 3.25% , [%30d] -30.83% 00:37:45 .p eth 00:37:45 Ethereum ==> [Price] 1932.14$ , [HIGH24H] 1996.65$ , [LOW24H] 1902.17$ , [%24h] -1.20% , [%7d] 3.03% , [%30d] -41.80% 00:37:50 .p xmr 00:37:50 Monero ==> [Price] 333.42$ , [HIGH24H] 352.98$ , [LOW24H] 324.64$ , [%24h] -4.40% , [%7d] 14.07% , [%30d] -51.10% 00:38:23 oh this is #monero 01:10:59 that would be good in monero markets channel 01:47:18 I see some ideas like RPC as a service and something like decentralized Rpc ? 07:35:34 apparently disroot admins can check your emails if for whatever reason have suspicion on you > check out disroot :P 07:54:49 @lancans:matrix.org: True, as can literally every other email provider if you don't encrypt your emails yourself 08:47:17 Isn't that something universal for ANY email provider? 08:47:40 Also, suspicion for what? That you're a bot or using it as a burner? 08:54:47 https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/matrix.org/mTPjnpgerKFVuRcCFIcMSATS.png (image.png) 09:03:57 lancans: they can (along with any other email provider), but in reality, they're unlikely to do it 09:04:19 also that's why disroot admins encourage you to delete all e-mails you receive after you download them to your computer 09:04:53 BlueyHealer: most likely just ToS violations in general 09:05:04 And is the ToS sensible? 09:05:11 you can read it yourself 09:06:58 BlueyHealer: https://disroot.org/tos 09:08:16 always assume that the e-mail provider can read your emails 09:08:47 and anyone who says they don't/can't are likely to be more suspicious 09:11:22 but we keep everything in ram and live forensics does not exist 09:12:23 even encrypted email providers could be storing a copy of all of your emails honeypot style, email wasn't made to be secure 09:13:10 Store or disable the encryption in general 09:13:22 use client-side encryption 09:13:24 like PGP 09:13:34 don't trust the email providers to safeguard your emails for you 09:14:09 👍 👍 👍 09:14:49 at least disroot lets you use client-side encryption..... unlike proton mail 09:14:57 the "trust me bro" encryption 09:19:06 trust us we won't report you to the feds (protonmail) 09:19:27 i don't even think they do client-side encryption anymore in their official client 09:19:37 which you are forced to use unless you fork over money to use their "bridge" 09:19:46 what a dumb service 09:19:56 and more suspicious than gmail 09:20:34 just use disroot or riseup with PGP :-) 09:26:52 "we at proton mail are so secure, that we aren't gonna let you use your own encryption. because how are we going to read your emails if you're gonna do it yourself?" 09:27:18 disroot sounds better lol 18:05:52 hello 18:29:13 Hey, in Jeffro's #Monerotopia talk he mentioned that the wallet outputs will have nonces such as 0/1, payment/change, peanutbutter/jelly as examples. 18:29:13 He said this was to prevent a burning bug, otherwise the key image would be the same if you had two transactions, and you could only spend one of them. 18:29:13 I sent a tip and asked if different wallets implemented different nonces if that would make the transactions identifiable.[... more lines follow, see https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/rsCLjuYKVzgtVnVi ] 21:26:47 @jeffro256:monero.social: also interestingly mentioned that OVKs could be created on a per address basis if using another key hierarchy, why hasn't this design been retained? Are there any drawbacks to it compared with the 5 keys hierarchy? 21:26:47 On another topic, the similarity between the current IVK + KIs and the new OVK has a fundamental difference, if you are constrained to provide KIs after a given date, the previous spent outputs of your wallet remain unknown. A court would need to have different motives to request all KIs vs KIs after a given date, so similarity is only total if you are required to provide ALL KIs. 21:29:23 why wouldnt a court just ask for your private key/wallet password at that point? 21:30:27 @hooftly:matrix.org: Because it violates your right to private property, so the legal basis for requesting it would be different 21:32:06 In what situation is a court requesting KIs where they cant request a pk? At that point there is a reason you are in court? What is a realistic scenario where one can be asked for and not the other? 21:33:01 @hooftly:matrix.org: Many scenarios, courts can't just ask what they want in a state of law 21:37:02 @hbs:matrix.org: Requesting an OVK could also go against article 17 of GDPR 23:20:02 https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/unredacted.org/pqzwYajZuDLTcTGQCrNvybfP.png (91907f7df42d29bccdd17205472fa22a.png) 23:24:30 rip roman