00:33:44 https://x.com/i/status/2034434281779404944 01:06:08 Can you make sure Obama has plenty of plastic bags delivered to his home - office and place of worship 08:56:44 > <@kiersten5821:matrix.org> it's pretty obvious that delisting affected the price negatively because you can just look at the chart, the small instant exchanges and p2p exchanges all rely on the major established exchanges for liquidity, they are a tiny fraction of the volume 08:56:44 Yeah, there is an initial shock which is fairly obvious. The less obvious thing is how the price trend is negatively impacted. Simple analysis of the chart seems to suggest that Monero price recovers (it does). What simple analysis doesn't show is how much faster and higher price would have recovered if it weren't for the delistings. 11:22:19 > <@kiersten5821:matrix.org> the btc ratio was down horrendously for 2 years after the delisting until the astroturfed zec pump brought attention back to privacy and supported it again, it would have been much higher without delistings with that pump 11:22:19 I wouldn't have it any other way, like the Xitter article I linked said, this has enabled more organic growth where the cancerous number go up cryptobros got filtered hard. It also should mean a better supported price floor since the amount of speculation in play makes up less effect than it would've if Monero was still on Binance and co. 11:54:36 @midipoet:matrix.org: It also doesnt show how much worse it could have performed. See chains like ltc, or tokens like aave, and many others, who have been outperformed. The facts show that delisted monero performed better than not delisted eth or ltc. Anything else is pure speculation as to whether ngu, ngd, slowed, or accellerated 11:57:51 <3 14:07:12 @pyratevevo:matrix.org: now i can use ofrn's logic and say it got pump and dumped from 800 to 300 while none of the other coins did so the delisting had no effect on filtering ngu hype guys, in fact it actually increased the number of ngu guys 14:14:34 what is ngu? 14:16:06 btcdwed: Number Go Up 14:17:08 wasnt that pump to 800 caused by someone exchanging stolen coins to xmr?:D 14:18:14 no that was the pump to 400 14:18:38 i thought it was the iran thing in jan 😓 14:20:47 :D 14:21:27 btcdwed: Fake news spread by a conman on twitter, zachXBT 14:22:00 i didnt read much into it, thx sbt 14:22:38 his wiki saying he is an OSINT pro, he cant be wrong :) 14:23:02 https://www.iranintl(dot)com/en/202601156396 i mean this reported 1,5 billion being transferred in crypto 14:28:57 could make sense, thx 14:29:10 its safe, that iran has a big crypto stack 14:29:19 safe/known 14:38:19 @kiersten5821:matrix.org: ? How does this have anything to do with ngu hype guys? the fall is just whales dumping the top. "ngu hype guys" will trade anything that pops up on the top gainers/losers/trending as advertised on their cex news feed 14:38:20 Your arguement doesnt use my logic at all 16:13:51 @ofrnxmr:xmr.mx: your logic is literally it did better than other coins therefore the delisting had no effect on the price, apply that and we get "it got pump and dumped from 300 to 800 back to 300 and other coins didnt have any pnd like that therefore the delisting increased the number of ngu hype guys" which is the exact [... too long, see https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/kuXgw_UKb1N3LXJE ] 17:23:53 it wasn't due to ngu bros, it was due to a hack that got laundered thru 17:27:12 we need to run A B testing :) 17:28:35 nioc: Do we need to get money dirty for that experiment? 17:56:57 all money is dirty, so np 17:58:21 hbs , dunno, many a b tests to do 18:01:38 wasnt that an exchange hack nioc? 18:08:03 1. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/04/29/did-the-usd330m-btc-hacker-deliberatley-pump-monero-to-make-even-more-money ~400$ 18:08:25 2. https://www.ainvest.com/news/monero-280m-pump-whale-laundering-fud-fueled-fomo-trap-2601/ 688-800$ 18:08:36 Need a CCS to pamp price 18:08:54 how much sushi u need? 18:10:15 I will check with Cat and get back to you 18:10:42 aye aye! 18:11:04 cat CCS pamp sushi orders incoming!