16:58:31 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Meeting in 1 hour
18:00:02 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Meeting time. Hello! https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/1427
18:00:14 <br-m> <sneedlewoods_xmr:matrix.org> hey
18:00:42 <selsta> hi
18:00:47 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Holiday season meeting :)
18:01:44 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Anyway, any reports from last week?
18:01:55 <br-m> <rbrunner7> @jpk68:matrix.org left this yesterday: "My updates so far include testing the GUI for Qt6 migration, plus minor patches as usual, and pestering the i2pd developer to fix a few bugs/issues"
18:02:09 <br-m> <sneedlewoods_xmr:matrix.org> mainly worked on your review comments on the wallet-rpc PR
18:02:16 <br-m> <rbrunner7> I could fix a fat bug in the Polyseed PR thanks to selsta
18:02:26 <br-m> <rbrunner7> And yes, that review
18:02:49 <br-m> <rbrunner7> The Wallet RPC server is almost a new program now
18:03:26 <selsta> rbrunner7: disclosure, the latest chatgpt model found it and i later validated it, that would have been a bad one if not caught
18:03:51 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Oh. Interesting.
18:04:16 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Sure, yeah. We wouldn't want to trash all existing multisig wallets
18:04:48 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Beside this hit, where there many false alarms in that review?
18:05:46 <selsta> honestly the models are quite good at not hallicuating at this point, it did not find any false alarms
18:06:14 <br-m> <rbrunner7> If those models will be able to help with reviews, that will be a net win
18:07:00 <br-m> <rbrunner7> I guess most people here are quite sceptical about incorporating code written by them, but reviews are a whole different story
18:07:11 <selsta> definitely, as long as we don't become complacent in skipping human reviews, but it's useful as an extra layer
18:07:15 <br-m> <jeffro256> Howdy
18:07:45 <UkoeHB> hi, no updaes
18:08:32 <UkoeHB> @jeffro256 what's the paper/section for https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/9828 ?
18:09:59 <br-m> <jeffro256> Hi, working on some speedups and bug fixes recently: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/10605 and https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/10924. Beefed up testing infra in preperation for the Carrot/FCMP++ test merges: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/10934. 
18:10:17 <br-m> <ofrnxmr> @rbrunner7: Using them to sanity check your own review, or pre-review before submission is nice as well
18:10:51 <br-m> <jeffro256> UkoeHB: It's mainly just an algebraic conversion that you can do if you know the equations for both curves 
18:11:09 <br-m> <rbrunner7> @jeffro256:monero.social: You think you can slip in somewhere a second review pass of my Polyseed PR? It ripened quite a bit since your initial review, there are also a few questions.
18:11:11 <br-m> <jeffro256> But I can try to find a more official source 
18:11:55 <br-m> <jeffro256> @rbrunner7: That PR is on my TODO list. I think I should be able to give it another pass this week 
18:12:05 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Splendid!
18:12:08 <br-m> <jeffro256> Thanks for the reminder 
18:13:16 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Seems we are through with the reports. Anything special to discuss or decide today?
18:14:20 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Does not seem to be the case. So I think we can close already for today. Thanks for attending, read you again next week!
18:14:28 <br-m> <jeffro256> UkoeHB: Do you want me to add it into the code as a comment?
18:14:46 <UkoeHB> sure that would be helpful for future readers
18:14:50 <br-m> <sneedlewoods_xmr:matrix.org> Thanks everyone
18:17:09 <br-m> <jeffro256> How about linking RFC 7748?
18:18:28 <br-m> <jeffro256> Section 4.1 of https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc7748.html
18:18:29 <UkoeHB> looks appropriate
19:18:07 <br-m> <jberman> Apologies for missing. My udpate is continuing the same: upstream FCMP++ integration PR's and continuing down the rabbit hole to solve the sporadic double spends on stressnet
19:32:11 <br-m> <rbrunner7> Thanks, added to the meeting log