16:57:59 Meeting in 1 hour 18:00:02 Meeting time. Hello! https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/1442 18:00:10 Hello 18:00:14 hi 18:00:22 Hi 18:00:23 waves 18:01:25 Hello 18:01:26 Buenos dias 18:01:45 Alright, on to the reports for last week! 18:01:58 Apart from the usual stuff, I failed to figure out why polyseed_static and debug builds don't get along. 18:02:22 I had a bit of a setback after @sneedlewoods_xmr:matrix.org found a problem with debug builds for my Polyseed PR, but I hope @tobtoht:monero.social will come to the rescue :) 18:03:07 various upstream monerod improvements, beginning to prepare for FCMP++/Carrot beta stressnet v3 18:03:23 Me: reviewed some PRs, investigated a few issues related to hardware wallets, etc. 18:03:24 I looked at this briefly, but I couldn't a solution. It's on my to-do list. 18:04:08 Seems we have quite a healthy flow of Monero PRs right now. 18:04:41 Yes, more than 4x since last year? 18:04:52 @tobtoht: wow 18:05:51 (not complaining, just one drawback: When I started with the Wallet API I could work on it for weekss without needing to rebase or fix conflicts, now there is something new every week) 18:05:56 And more than 100x since Jan-Mar 2022 when we had a grand total of 4 commits, ow. 18:06:38 Then I also remembered (again) that maybe Polyseed will have the same licensing problem as that other package with crypto ops from Tevador ... 18:06:49 The discussion on whether to allow copyleft code in non-optional parts of the codebase continues on: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/10964 18:07:00 I guess neither tevador or jeffro are present? 18:07:04 Ah, ok, will follow 18:08:17 In which case, I suggest we continue the discussion asynchronously on the PR. 18:08:31 Does this all mean that strictly speaking all current wallet apps with permissive licenses that use Tevador's Polyseed library are in some sort of license breach? 18:09:10 Alright, maybe that question also already belongs there 18:09:14 FWIW, Cake Wallet uses their own implementation of Polyseed, as far as I can tell 18:09:24 Yes, unless they comply with the license terms (which is none of them?) 18:09:54 Yes, Cake Wallet uses a rewrite in Dart 18:11:14 In the of mx25519, I would have been more understanding of restrictive licensing if mx25519 didn't incorporate permissive sources to the extent that it does. 18:12:27 Still, even if mx25519 had been mostly original work, I don't think we should erode Monero's permissive core or burden downstream projects with license compliance. 18:13:23 In a personal relationship you would say now "It's complicated" :) 18:13:43 Difficult trade-offs, as I see it 18:13:55 The mx25519 situationship :P 18:14:37 Anyway, seems we are through already with the reports and related things. Do we have something beyond that to discuss today? (Assuming licensing makes sense to discuss further in the frame of the given GitHub PR.) 18:15:13 Maybe just a cry out: Stressnet V3 now please! 18:15:35 @rbrunner7: pretty please 18:16:28 (About 50% joking of course) 18:16:29 👌 18:16:37 I hope we can get another batch of FCMP++ PRs merged this week :) 18:17:07 Does Luigi do any merge work at all nowadays? 18:17:31 Not really. He only merges things I can't, like changes to the CoC. 18:17:47 Ok 18:18:26 Looks a bit like we have, how to call this, a bit of a "bus factor" there? 18:19:25 I think bf also has access to the repo (and maybe more core team?) 18:19:55 Is there a reason the 'members' of the monero-project org are not public? 18:20:26 I don't know 18:21:15 I have merge rights on 4 repos, but I don't think I'm a member of monero-project. 18:21:46 GitHub's rights management is quite byzantine ... 18:22:06 @tobtoht: Yeah "You must be a member to see who’s a part of this organization." 18:22:14 I saw I little bit of it when I set up my "Seraphis" organization. 18:22:49 Maybe it's nothing more than avoiding the headache of managing a list of organization members in the first place? 18:23:36 I mean, it could be good for transparency, even if it's not the most helpful thing ever 18:24:12 The fact that almost nobody noticed this, as far as I remember, might want to tell us that it pretty much does not matter ... 18:25:00 Looks like the meeting proper ran its course for today. Thanks everybody for attending, read you again next week! 18:25:34 thanks everybody, cu 18:50:46 I misse meeting, but i found a 6x speedup in fcmp wallet sync > <@rbrunner7> Maybe just a cry out: Stressnet V3 now please! 18:51:02 Shared with jbizzle for feedback/correctness check 18:52:13 (as if he doesnt already have enoigh on his plate :P)