Oooooooooo m.youtube.com/watch?v=pC5vHoTX6fE

Muh liquidity

check out my article

> <@demitasse:matrix.org> check out my article

> narrativerry.xyz/blog/bitcoin-privacy-is-a-joke

cant be broken if it never existed

<ian.niculescu> Why do you think LN is garbage ?

<ian.niculescu> The ian he talking about is ME I love it

i dont think its garbage. i know

<ian.niculescu> bruh you said LN is garbage tech

cuz it is

* i know its garbage

<ian.niculescu> has sorry i misunderstood your first response

<ian.niculescu> why do you not see a future where we are transacting on LN ?

<ian.niculescu> this is what i'm thinking about

LN is built for KYC and centralization

<ian.niculescu> what about a LN with monero ? do you thing it solves this problem ?

literally paypal 2.0

bridgerton[m]: no because its the way the tech is built

not all layer 2s are equal

id be very interested in seeing the monero community's solution to instant offchain payments

<ian.niculescu> ok

like a zk-starks sidechain

<ian.niculescu> interesting

As I understand... (full message at libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/do…7dba44ab0e7f62ff39a59fbbdf2fdee7da6)

what about Drivechain

idk but we are a long way from any L2 on monero

no need for it now, and better to let other projects build before we improve their work

Yeah our l1 is not even congested

<ian.niculescu> but I don't get why LN has to be custodial from what i understand it is quite easy to use with lightweight LN node

bridgerton[m]: Lighting

Normie will use custodial wallet

<ian.niculescu> i hate the idea that custodial wallets are a thing

So that they don’t have to run full node and lighting channel

Ethereum is doing a lot of l2 solutions

Maybe we can learn from them

zk rollup hype

Anyone know who or which group ultimately approve CCS proposals? Just wondering who I should reach to regarding the possibility of my CCS proposal receiving approval. Obviously received a mixed response from community people whether I should continue so wondering what happens moving forward.

<johnfoss68[m]> "Anyone know who or which group..." <- You can give without taking 😙 But I don't know either.

johnfoss68[m], link to the proposal

ty

Then that was a follow up I made a couple of days ago

seems solid, dont see anything objectionable

hope it gets merged

How problematic is address reuse in Monero?

you shouldn't reuse

it would be nice to see wallets adopt address autogeneration by default

glumanda[m]: Much smaller than in "transparent coins", in any case. Your address(es) will never appear in the clear in the blockchain.

<Encore> glumanda: Posting the same address on different sites could be used for linking identities, but like rbrunner pointed out it's not nearly as much of an issue

* different sites/chats could

<Veemo> youtu.be/u-sNSjS8cq0

<Veemo> One of the worst videos ive ever seen