<v​tnerd:monero.social> By circuit I meant connection the garlic connection (i2p terms iirc), sorry. So if you've made a connection to a i2p service, then send two txes over that connection, the other side can infer that both came from the same wallet (unless it's an open relay node). In that situation, you can also identify the real spends in a ring, if the change from one was used in the next. This is <clipped message>

<v​tnerd:monero.social> highly unlikely due to the lock time - the connection for relay is typically changed by then

<v​tnerd:monero.social> Without a leak in the p2p it's gotta be a mess of incomplete information - otoh you can probably sell people on utility with pretty graphics and such

<b​oog900:monero.social> Their i2p operation could be separate to their Monero operation. They could be just monitoring i2p traffic. They do run separate operations already (Bitcoin).

<b​asses:matrix.org> Why no "journalists" investigated lionlink? I know that most lack the technical skills, but 404media and micahflee could do it (the ones I know).

<b​asses:matrix.org> To me, lionlink looks like a commercial spyware company, but could also be similar to the namesilo domain registrar situation, where most CSAM hosters were their customers, idk if their situation got any better tho.

<3​21bob321:monero.social> Probably no glory in it