<AmAguestHello> "this is prob a question for..." <- it isn't more complex than writing any other embedded software for a board with tight available resources. Are there a lot of users that need it ?

If I recall correctly, trezor does the work in house / contracted.

As a customer its best to ask trezor if they are, and if not, ask them to.

<AmAguestHello> "this is prob a question for..." <- hmm, judging by grant for another currency support it's more profitable to write firmware than cryptography. It's just a question of money

* of money, with proper reward they will implement even by themselves.

* of money, with proper reward they will implement it even by themselves.

is there an update date for v0.18 release?

s/update/updated/

it would be best to do a meeting monday when most are back from monerokon

like i said, i'm always available to do binaries. there is still a question on how to continue regarding multisig and ledger

wasnt it agreed to merge 8149, mark is a experimental and disable it by default?

s/is/as/, s/a//

the only people who can use it are those who compile the master branch was the caveat? also to confirm: if binaries are released 'today' - trezor users are fine, but what happens to ledger users? can they not sign any transactions after the hard fork?

agreed by who? 8149 isn't approved and the audit isn't done yet

the audit should be done until monday

plowsof[m]: trezor users can only make transactions once we merge the trezor integration, but the code is at least ready

ledger users can't make any tx after the hardfork

reg meetings: so ideally a meeting tomorrow? and another after the audit? tuesday/wednesday?

monday

selsta: from the logs of one of the hardfork mettings

s/mettings/meetings/

ErCiccione meeting tomorrow and on monday please? xD

don't see the point in tomorrow

people are at monerokon and i'm also not available

right right ignore tomorrow

r4v3r23[m]: it still requires an approval and ideally the audit, hopefully we are smarter by monday

IIRC the options were... (full message at libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/do…c578f31747e17c99c038eda6e432b0276dc)

Though, with 2 there is no reason to label experimental imo

I'm not going to merge it now if we have the audit in a couple days

Audit good = merge... (full message at libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/do…ef0dd02a901bf5c89981d341eef61335224)

Something like that?

that's what I want to discuss Monday, the audit should hopefully be done by then

Ill likely stay out of the meeting, but I do think (if audit is delayed) we should ship so long as ooo is OKAY with shipping koes changes resulting from the initial review.

Would be a roundabout way of doing things, but ultimately no different than if ooo made the review changes himself and we went without an audit.

Just wanted to make my preference clear

(Should only HF with old multisig if ooo doesnt agree to changes or if audit is bad or delayed) my non-technical opinion

Now is your Bitcoin wallet or coinbase 0.00000 I promise 0.80500 in less than 24 hours without sending money to anyone. Earn 0.764 in 7hours, No referrals, No Ads, No scams. Ask how(me)

Or join t.me/+JdEg2rIn7E0wZDFk

shayerhaver[m]: how

I give you my coinbase login and you top it up with fullz?

off topic for this channel

<hyc> "off topic for this channel" <- ^ Scam / spam

Kick/ban em

ofrnxmr selsta 8149 alone isn't secure without a follow up PR by UkoeHB I don't believe they've created yet to address the leader burning bug. While I'd prefer 1, with that other PR, I'm personally leaning towards 4 with the unsafe label while we wait for the audit and then can re-introduce the follow up PR.

hey, I created completions (for fish shell) for monerod and monero-wallet-gui. I opened a PR with them (#8390 on core). Anyone here who uses fish could take a look at that? I put them in the contrib folder.

Also does it belong to the contrib folder or does it make sense to have it there in the code at all?

Yeah I agree with selsta. It makes more to put it in utils. The contrib folder (besides epee) is mostly compatibility, packaging, patches, etc

Also do you know if these completions work with Bash also?

Also is this your first PR? If so, awesome !