-
jeffro256[m]
-
jeffro256[m]
Is it reproducible ?
-
UkoeHB
jeffro256[m] it doesn't happen on my machine so idk
-
selsta
UkoeHB: maybe you can add some extra logging to the seraphis_serialization_demo.seraphis_squashed_empty test to see why it fails?
-
jberman[m]
here's what I get
-
jberman[m]
[----------] 2 tests from seraphis_serialization_demo
-
jberman[m]
[ RUN ] seraphis_serialization_demo.seraphis_squashed_empty
-
jberman[m]
Floating point exception (core dumped)
-
selsta
could be divide by zero for example
-
hyc
that's nearly the only cause of FPE these days
-
UkoeHB
divide by zero in serialization?
-
UkoeHB
it's serializing an empty tx in that test
-
jeffro256[m]
Shouldn't a divide by zero be caught and handled like a normal exception with google test ? I.e. it should just fail a specific test?
-
jberman[m]
-
jberman[m]
-
UkoeHB
jberman[m]: oh that would do it
-
UkoeHB
wonder why it works on my machine...
-
selsta
.merges
-
xmr-pr
8319 8355 8516 8517 8525 8527 8529 8543 8564 8569 8570 8571 8578 8580 8590 8593 8594
-
nfnnss[m]
hey i had a question abt hostin a public node over tor. i got a synced node correctly connecting over clearnet, but when i run a torsocks command to check connection over tor it says my address cannot be resolved. did some digging around online without luck. any advice for this?
-
nfnnss[m]
This makes me feel like my configuration may be correct, but my node-peers may be unstable? "Guard poiuty is failing a very large amount of circuits. Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded, but it could also but it could also mean an attack against you or potentially the guard itself. Success counts are 71/151. Use counts are 0/0. 136 circuits completed, 0 were unusable, 65 collapsed, and 106 timed out. For reference, your
-
nfnnss[m]
timeout cutoff is 81 seconds."
-
nfnnss[m]
s/Success counts are 71/151. Use counts are 0/0. 136 circuits completed, 0 were unusable, 65 collapsed, and 106 timed out. For reference, your timeout cutoff is 81 seconds.//
-
nfnnss[m]
* <del>This makes me feel like my configuration may be correct, but my node-peers may be unstable? "Guard poiuty is failing a very large amount of circuits. Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded, but it could also but it could also mean an attack against you or potentially the guard itself."</del>
-
nfnnss[m]
* <del>This makes me feel like my configuration may be correct, but my node-peers may be unstable? "Guard poiuty is failing a very large amount of circuits. Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded, but it could also but it could also mean an attack against you or potentially the guard itself."</del> I'm silly, was looking at the tor logs of me trying to connect to my node. Of course a lot of circuits were failing...
-
sech1
-
selsta
sech1: whatever issues they have seems unrelated
-
selsta
it's like you said someone sending invalid data