<rbrunner> "About the second question I can..." <- Are you familiar with THORChain?

gitlab.com/blackprotocol/blacknode (don’t mind the readme, it’s outdated and a concept from 2021.)

Thank you anyway!

We're pulling the unlock_time from monero_api.cpp and we're getting a value of 12169003854200832 for this tx which unlocks in block 2833317. What conversions/transformings need to be applied to it? xmrchain.net/tx/e89b28014791364ccf7…22686795aa7f758464c742f68bb00909f/1

monero_api.cpp where?

sgp:

(gdb) print (unsigned long long)(12169003854200832>>32)

$7 = 2833317

Hi, I wanted to contribute to monero, mostly because of poor UX experience with the CLI wallet but It appears that the issue was "solved", monero-project/monero #6192. It still wasn't merged, is any more work needed to get it merged or what?

<moneromooo> "(gdb) print (unsigned long long)..." <- thanks will check

<zerodan[m]> "Hi, I wanted to contribute to..." <- Random idea for a solution (if the issue of ctrl-C being disabled during the password prompt is still present): maybe, instead of directly showing the password prompt when the wallet gets locked, there should be a placeholder screen showing something like "The wallet is locked. Press [enter] to unlock, or [ctrl-C] to quit" - that way, it's only one extra keypress to unlock the wallet, and it also prevents

the user from entering a ton of random charaters in the prompt without noticing

<moneromooo> "(gdb) print (unsigned long long)..." <- that worked, thanks :)

Hi I am dgoon from Anon Shop. I have recently seen people saying, "NFTs are not possible on Monero". I want to be clear that I think NFTs are stupid, and I love monero. I am also a big fan of technicals. So I thought for a bit and I think I have a ugly but doable way to do NFTs. I have just two requirements for a NFT. 1. Embed image in the blockchain or a hash. 2. Transfer ownership of that image of a NFT around. Under those two rules I

thought of this way of accomplishing that goal. You could make a NFT, as I defined them, by creating a transaction. In that transaction you embed the viewkey in tx extra along with the image and you would need to also decide rules for picking which utxo to track. Now that everyone can see your utxo set you need to be able to prove that you sent that specific utxo, and you should be able to use some proofs from around page 79 of zero to

Monero, such as OutProofV2 and InProofV2. My main idea is that people can opt int to reveal their utxos and the tracking of a specific utxo should be possible if people can opt into that by embedding the necessary proofs in tx_extra or some offchain site. This is an absurd way of doing things. I was just wondering if people thought it was possible. Its stupid but possible is my current opinion on Monero NFTs, which in my opinion is not

the same thing as them being impossible. Feel free to ignore this post, since there are obviously better things to spend your time on, I just wanted to put the idea out there and get feedback from a more technical crowd. Thank you for taking the time to read this.

<DGoon[m]> "Hi I am dgoon from Anon Shop..." <- please refer to talks at matrix.to/#/#monero-research-lab:monero.social

What would be the reason that I would see missed_tx from a /get_transactions monerod RPC call for transactions that are already in the blockchain? Is my blockchain database slightly corrupt? There are at least a dozen of these in the past 5 years. The same txs are not missing when I try another monerod instance.

dEBRUYNE: needmoney90_ needmoney90 Approve please :D reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/11b4f3…arrives_on_desktop_beta_release_for

sorry wrong room

monerobull[m] is your guy ^

Woah

Approved

toldja :p

thank you