<jowisdom:matrix.org> Hi

<jowisdom:matrix.org> Any hacker or cybersecurity personales here?

<munzzyy:matrix.org> hi officer

<rbrunner7> @jowisdom:matrix.org: Did you check already this whether it's relevant for your case? github.com/monero-project/meta/blob…r/VULNERABILITY_RESPONSE_PROCESS.md

<jowisdom:matrix.org> @rbrunner7: Hey I have tapped But unfortunately I won't decieve you that I know a lot about computer language and cybersecurity information.. infact I have tapped the link but ,I have just read through and I remained ignorant..I can't interprete what that website does..hope you can guide me please..i.have inboxed you please

selsta opened pull request #11319: Harden CLI handling of daemon responses

> monero-project/monero #11319

selsta opened pull request #11320: Harden CLI handling of daemon responses [release-v0.18]

> monero-project/monero #11320

selsta opened pull request #11321: blockchain: fix lock ordering in check_against_checkpoints

> monero-project/monero #11321

selsta opened pull request #11322: http: bind Digest authentication to the request URI

> monero-project/monero #11322

selsta opened pull request #11324: wallet_api: clear stale daemon login [release-v0.18]

> monero-project/monero #11324

selsta opened pull request #11323: wallet_api: clear stale daemon login

> monero-project/monero #11323

<milas900:matrix.org> Question for devs is there heavy reliance on AI to code for monero or how monero devs are using the AI ?

<jeffro256> me personally: no

<torir:unredacted.org> @milas900:matrix.org: The devs are not reliant on AI to code. Very little code is AI-generated and contributers are required to fully understand they submit, AI or not. A few people are experimenting with using AI to review pull requests.

<torir:unredacted.org> The overall attitude around here is somewhat against AI. A lot of us are tired about people claiming that fully vibed AI is acceptable to use for a security and privacy critical tool like Monero.

<torir:unredacted.org> I can't speak authoritatively for everyone here, but that is the overall vibe I've gotten.

<jpk68:matrix.org> IMO, another somewhat common take (which I happen to share) is that if the fix is correct, it doesn't really matter who or what authored the code.

<jpk68:matrix.org> That being said, it mostly applies to small bugfixes or improvements. Fully vibed features being added, or using LLMs to blindly make design decisions, is something that would likely not be considered acceptable