-
sech1AMD lineup from Zen 2 to Zen 5 has been tested: gist.github.com/SChernykh/6058ecf01c929883b9d19c7eeadc8809
-
sech1Need more Intel CPUs, preferably new ones
-
m-relay<syntheticbird:monero.social> Could you stop cooking please
-
m-relay<syntheticbird:monero.social> it's very embarrassing for us mere mortals
-
DataHoarderinteresting to see even Zen2 going that well
-
sech1Yes, I expected Zen 5 to get better improvement
-
sech1Maybe I don't fully understand where the actual bottleneck is
-
sech1But it has to do with memory access, because program size increase helps all Ryzens
-
DataHoarderAMD uProf works well to gather the statistics on memory or retired ops and delays
-
DataHoarderthough if you want specifics you probably should just create a bunch of programs ahead of time so it can annotate them
-
DataHoarderthere's a bunch more small samples in comments
-
DataHoardermy weird nerfed Zen2 with just P012 should arrive in a couple of days :)
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> ### RandomX v2 Benchmark Results
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> **AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S @ 99.86W**
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> | Algorithm | Hashrate | Relative Speed | Hash/Joule | VM+AES/s | VM+AES/Joule | Relative Work/Joule |
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> |-----------|----------|----------------|------------|----------|--------------|---------------------|
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> | RandomX v1 | 15073.65 | 100.0% | 150.94 | 63.22e9 | 633.12e6 | 100.0% |
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> | RandomX v2 | 14003.05 | 90.0% | 139.40 | 88.10e9 | 877.05e6 | 130.0% |
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> **Config:** threads=32, affinity=0xFFFFFFFF, init=32
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> **Stability:** V1 crashes: 0/2, V2 crashes: 0/2
-
m-relay<benchmarking420:matrix.org> (didnt tweak nothing, lazy, not running headless, lazy, numbers could be better probably, didnt check from the wall yet, lazy)