-
jtgrassietxn chaining on bitcoin is spending unconfirmed outputs in a chain that gets confirmed in the same block
-
jtgrassiesounds like the definition (above) for atomic swaps / seraphis is something different then
-
» xmrack[m] uploaded an image: (572KiB) <libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/do…ClpScaSrRLtJBwLKdt/ima_75b6a4c.jpeg>
-
xmrack[m]Paper is behind a paywall
-
xmrack[m]Havent read it but the abstract sounds promising
-
atomfried[m]<xmrack[m]> "Paper is behind a paywall" <- If someone wants to read it DM me
-
UkoeHB7 elements for constant time proof is pretty significant
-
UkoeHBconstant size*
-
UkoeHBunfortunately not on sci-hub either
-
atomfried[m]<UkoeHB> "unfortunately not on sci-hub..." <- check your DMs
-
sech1Rucknium[m] P2Pool forked successfully, and the number of outputs in coinbase reduced from 102 to 35: p2pool.io/explorer/tx/779559b7ae3ce…c152ee5a3632ec8d0c62bf7189594a48db2 -> p2pool.io/explorer/tx/dee5fbbd8f413…3c1f28cdba2143ffb6d1c7a781f526ae757
-
ofrnxmr[m]Thanks sech1!
-
Rucknium[m]Wonderful! Thank you for all your hard work!
-
meropeRucknium: are you still monitoring payouts? Would be nice to doublecheck that p2pool is still earning as much as it used to (in proportion to its hashrate) before the fork
-
Rucknium[m]Yes. You don't need to poll the mempool data for that (which I have continued to do). You can get it from the blockchain data.