<a​ck-j:matrix.org> @tevador I’ve been curious to hear your opinion/thoughts on tx-POW and the practicality behind it. It sounds like we are not going in that direction but wanted to know your thoughts on it to prevent spam attacks

<0​x1zxq7896lp2zero:matrix.org> i meant current fcmp++ one being discuss

<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> If current research holds and we don't need a fallback, FCMP++s should be incredibly efficient for what they do with only marginal overhead compared to FCMPs. Future improvements would be to the GSPs and already stated potential improvements to the SA+L proof.

kayabanerve: Just noticed that the research proposal got fully funded!

<k​ayabanerve:monero.social> !

<0​x1zxq7896lp2zero:matrix.org> nice

<r​euben:firo.org> Nice congratulations!