<k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> Clover?

<s​yntheticbird:monero.social> yes

<s​yntheticbird:monero.social> as i understand it Rucknium is waiting on Dandelion++ author to review clover work since lacking in depth analysis. But since he got no news and that the goal was having peer review, maybe some companies might get a review done?

<v​tnerd:monero.social> I thought someone already looked it over, and was unimpressed?

<v​tnerd:monero.social> I can't find that in chat logs, so I must be mistaken

<a​ck-j:matrix.org> IIRC the D++ author was unimpressed with clover but I could be mistaken

<a​ck-j:matrix.org> Bat signal Rucknium

I can't get an accurate date of when Rucknium said this but for context "I got a reply from Giulia Fanti, the lead author of the Dandelion++ paper ( ece.cmu.edu/directory/bios/fanti-giulia.html ). She said she hadn't read the Clover paper yet, but would take a look. Clover is an alternative to D++ that is supposed to have better

privacy for nodes with closed inbound ports."