<kayabanerve:matrix.org> Hello,I reached out to Cypher Stack to request they review the security proofs for GBPs. While Goodell reviewed Aaron's proofs prior, Aaron updated the protocol to a prior draft due to it being a more efficient variation (a few hundred bytes) at my request.Goodall, while reviewing the proofs, noted a discrepancy. I have an ind [... too long, see mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/t-G-3sAKU2pSbDVK ]

<kayabanerve:matrix.org> Noooo Matrix removed my new lines 😭

<kayabanerve:matrix.org> But anyways, meeting on Wednesday?

<kayabanerve:matrix.org> *Goodell, not Goodall, damn autocorrect

<jberman> Here is a simple proposal to make tx weight roughly equal to byte size with justification: seraphis-migration/monero #44#issuecomment-3423391977

<jberman> Of note, you can still calculate tx weight in an offline context with just n inputs, n outputs, and extra length.

<jberman> Considering the ongoing difficulty to reach rough consensus on the FCMP++ tx weight calculation, I figure this would be a simple solution that has the smallest surface for disagreement. Imo it's easiest to justify