<ack-j:matrix.org> Hi yes that was found by opus 4.8 or opus 5. I cant remember > <@rucknium> If I may ask, did an LLM assist with finding @ack-j:matrix.org 's bug?

<ack-j:matrix.org> (Not a formal offer but gauging interest) Would devs be interested in MAGIC sponsoring the cost of having claude review Github PRs?

<ack-j:matrix.org> If yes:

<ack-j:matrix.org> 1. I believe it would be most effective to limit who could initiate claude to perform a review (restricted to core devs so we dont waste credits on typo prs for example)

<ack-j:matrix.org> 2. The claude review should not count towards the 2 mandatory reviews needed to merge.

<ravfx:xmr.mx> Each time a new PR get merged, it shoud audit the whole project (that's just what I think because it's probably what the adversary does... But they have virtually unlimited tokens).

<ravfx:xmr.mx> A new PR can trigger a bug somewhere else.

<ack-j:matrix.org> I disagree, that would cost a lot of money and produce worse results. We can do audits of the codebase outside of CI/CD. The llm is smart enough to look at the downstream effects of the code change

<ravfx:xmr.mx> Yes, it would cost a lot of money.

<jpk68:matrix.org> @ack-j:matrix.org: I can barely be considered a "dev" (if at all), but I don't think that's a good idea. It would cost way too much and mostly be unhelpful

<loop.ster:matrix.org> If you wanted to go that route, CodeRabbit is already free for OSS projects