<sgp_> @rucknium:monero.social is there anything I need to include now to ensure that the agenda item for Wednesday includes a discussion on the second circuit review?

<rucknium> @sgp_:monero.social: Title of agenda item would be good to have. Any URLs if relevant.

<sgp_> “Second FCMP++ circuit review: CCS approval” as the title

<sgp_> mrelay.p2pool.observer/m/monero.social/DnzsnLhAyouIKdiAOZhLpSVZ.png (image.png)

<sgp_> ^ this was the RFQ email that went out

<ack-j:matrix.org> ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11676613

<ack-j:matrix.org> Can anyone get this paper behind the pay wall?

<rucknium> IMHO, this is the interesting part, if credible:

<rucknium> > Using the Monero protocol itself, I use messaging and peer-seeding procedures to build an observed peer edge list of the network.

<rucknium> It is believed that it is not possible to figure out which nodes are connected with each other.

<lordx3nu:matrix.org> @ack-j:matrix.org: arxiv.org/abs/2609.10260

<jpk68:matrix.org> That does not appear to be the same paper

<lordx3nu:matrix.org> oh weird, I was going to post this anyways and thought it was the same paper because of the upload date. Anyways, it looks like the paper I posted is by a very similar team as the "Deanonymizing Monero Transactions in Tor Network" paper that was published this summer.

<jpk68:matrix.org> Yep, same author as before. See here ^ > <@ack-j:matrix.org> @rucknium:monero.social: