<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> [@rucknium:monero.social](https://matrix.to/#/@rucknium:monero.social) is it possible to store less records?

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> like, only the most recent one

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The 525 checkpoint was invalidated by a reorg before it broadcast

<r​ucknium:monero.social> Yes. I can reduce it from 10 to 1.

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Somehow spintered into 3 chains

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> testnetnode4.moneroconsensus.info stopped due to checkpoints (i'm mining to it now, to try to surpass the following)

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> testnetnode3.moneroconsensus.info shows 2 chains. One of them is the old/organic hashpower split off from the checkpoints. One of of them is my attacking chain, now in the lead

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> then i locally have a checkpointed node at height 534, somehow

<o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The 534 node has 18 peers

<g​ingeropolous:monero.social> selsta, based on the bill i got so far, its possibly to bring the cost down by a factor of 8 perhaps. But its spot instances, so its not a guaranteed thing.

<g​ingeropolous:monero.social> from the top four rigs on MRR, they can somehow offer between 40 and 50 MH/s for $171 / hour

<g​ingeropolous:monero.social> or $3.70 per megahash-hour