-
plowsofare we going to be arbitrarily punished for requesting rapid re-deployments of the website now :P
-
mesaoptimizeryou now have to pay 1 XMR for every re-deployment of the website
-
mesaoptimizer(that's a joke)
-
plowsofLol
-
binaryFatemy only concern is proper opsec when accessing the hosting server, which comes with a bit of constraints for myself. Otherwise I don't mind.
-
kayabaNerveWould a PR to the site to have hashes-v0.18.0.txt and hashes-v0.18.1.txt be accepted? Basically, ensure easy access to signatures for all currently supported Monero versions.
-
kayabaNerve*this would leave hashes untouched as a copy of whatever the current head is
-
sech1we have all historical hashes on github: github.com/monero-project/monero-si…commits/master/downloads/hashes.txt
-
kayabaNervesech1: Yeah, I pointed that out, BUT monero-site isn't tagged
-
kayabaNerveSo you have to lookup the hash for the specific commit you want and grab that.
-
kayabaNerve... or clone the repo, run git log on the file, grep for the version you want which isn't 100% guaranteed to work, run a filter pattern, and then use that hashes.txt?
-
kayabaNerveLike that's the mess we're discussing for this to be programmatic.
-
kayabaNerveIf it's just under the Monero site, like the actual binaries are, it can be kept solely programmatic over the site. Not programmatic over a version AND a monero-site commit hash.
-
binaryFatekayabaNerve might relate to monero-project/monero-site #811 ?
-
binaryFatedidn't progress on this one but if a particular solution pleases everyone, happy to do
-
kayabanerve[m]Cool. Exactly what I'm discussing and seems you signed off :D
-
kayabanerve[m]I was only proposing it for officially supported versions, as I'm not here to discuss archival beyond what git offers, yet modern day access feasibility, which git isn't offering
-
kayabanerve[m]But yeah, will do a pr to resolve that