h​ardenedsteel, I'm shocked now, I normally don't give a damn about licenses (also my own work) but I put normally all under BipCot NoGov License or WTFPL, when I realy need or should put a license.

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> policy

<3​21bob321:monero.social> yeah i dont think they will know this

<b​asses:matrix.org> We need to stop using BSD license

<b​asses:matrix.org> WTFPL is a meme, not a real license

<b​asses:matrix.org> SGP

<3​21bob321:monero.social> Free bsd licence?

<b​asses:matrix.org> c*ck license

<3​21bob321:monero.social> Openbsd licence ?

basses, how you can say it is not a real license? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL Although I agree, when I use it it is essentially let me the f... alone with government sh*t...

<b​asses:matrix.org> you can use public domain license

<b​asses:matrix.org> so idk why use this weird license

<b​asses:matrix.org> "license"

to express let me lone with that sh*t....

I think license are only an unecessary burden, which brings you only an advantage is you believe in governemnt. If not there is anyway only good maners or don't give a f... IMO

<b​asses:matrix.org> well....

the same like with BipCot, in reality, what do I care what people do with my source, but it bugs me if gov is using it, I can't anyway do nothing about it, you can be sure that gov (and gov employees don't care either, there are enough examples) but I want at least let them know that they are unplaesant parasits.