.merges

<syntheticbird> nope > <@redsh4de:matrix.org> How do we feel about Tailwind CSS? Think it might be useful here

<syntheticbird> I'm against Tailwind CSS

<syntheticbird> this is a trap

<syntheticbird> I prefer clear class CSS definitions with all the styles I need rather than having to put 10000 classes and making the html looks unreadable

<syntheticbird> also it's hard to mix tailwind css classes with custom styles as it oftens collision and causes weird effects

<syntheticbird> the "I didn't know this tailwind class was also doing that" is something that happens literally everytime

<redsh4de:matrix.org> fair, not a fan of it myself, started considering it only when seeing how verbose my custom CSS semantic class definitions and their usage were getting

<redsh4de:matrix.org> solved most of it today/yesterday by extracting the repeating class definitions into more generic components

<redsh4de:matrix.org> most of the remaining verbosity is due to repeating CSS for arrangement/layout... have to make elements like <Grid> or <Stack> or <Columns> to arrange the UI components