-
apotheon
So . . . I know this isn't a Monero question, but . . . are Litecoin addresses from the same wallet identifiable via the blockchain as linked addresses?
-
apotheon
1. This is Monero-relevant, but I'm not telling you why.
-
ndorf
if it's anything like Bitcoin, they shouldn't be
-
apotheon
2. The #litecoin channel seems to have a small, inactive user base, as opposed to this channel's large, inactive userbase.
-
ocb
are you talking about mweb testnet addresses?
-
ndorf
(unless of course you later spend outputs from both addresses in 1 tx)
-
apotheon
ndorf: I think Litecoin was basically a Bitcoin fork, so yeah, that's what I thought.
-
apotheon
ocb: No, I'm talking about actual live network stuff involving Litecoin.
-
apotheon
I wonder whether there's anything like coinjoin for Litecoin.
-
apotheon
probably not
-
ocb
^ had that idea for a while
-
ocb
but as you said, user base is pretty small
-
ocb
from my ltc electrumx servers i can see somebody is pumping transactions intentionally from time to time
-
ocb
peeling an onion from a big utxo with minimal changes. i believe ltc is pretty much driven on a small user base with hypes on various implementations like segwit was, and now mweb is. but thats only me.
-
ocb
"uptime": "24d 10h 56m", "txs sent": 8585, "request total": 73802327
-
ocb
9 months ago it barely had 20-30, not sure what exactly changed. be careful.
-
ocb
but that's offtopic, won't spam anymore
-
ocb
is there a way or a list to publish an onion address of a monero remote rpc port.
-
ocb
s/port/service/
-
gingeropolous
ocb, monero.fail
-
ocb
thank you
-
apotheon
advertising spiel: "Monero: Giving You Reasons To Celebrate Private Transactions But Not Being Able To Share The Joy Because That Would Deanonymize You"
-
apotheon
What do you think? Is it a winner?
-
nioc
you choose who to share the joy with
-
apotheon
way to ruin a joke
-
nioc
I know not what I do
-
nioc
I need brain as a service
-
gingeropolous
your node is 7.6 years behind. 7.6 years. wow
-
haZ
why does syncing take forever recently?
-
haZ
it says 3 days for 2000 blocks and shows SYNCHRONIZATION started every 5 minutes
-
nioc
haZ: is it HDD or SSD
-
nioc
also try turning it off and on again, no joke
-
nioc
just "exit" and restart
-
nioc
there are some recent blocks that are very resource intensive
-
haZ
nioc: its hdd but it's never been this slow
-
nioc
haZ: someone was combining many many outputs up to the max allowable per tx, I think 194 outputs which is what makes some of the more recent blocks difficult
-
nioc
there were many such txs
-
nioc
they are also cpu intensive
-
nioc
that may be it
-
haZ
nioc: ok thanks, have tried restarting it
-
hyc
ringct txs can only have 16 outputs max
-
Mochi101
15 and change address
-
Mochi101
er output
-
chomwitt
my pruned node took approximately 15-18 hours to sync (40G)
-
chomwitt
on SSD ..although dont understand why it matters that. does monerod access heavily that data while writing it ?
-
cornfeedhobo
about syncing. I do notice that syncing takes hours if host is months out of date, and it seems like there is a re-scan of the entire chain. has anyone else seen this?
-
nioc
hyc: yes, I meant inputs :)
-
nioc
AIUI those are limited by size relative to the blocksize
-
nioc
3 fit in the default blocksize
-
selsta
cornfeedhobo: if you start after months the node doesn't have any fast sync checkpoints
-
cornfeedhobo
that makes sense. thank you.
-
selsta
cornfeedhobo: so basically if you didn't start for months check first if updates are available
-
selsta
if yes, it will contain new checkpoints and syncing will be faster