-
ocb
selsta: there wasn't any more freezes in the meantime but found this related to the last one - 'segfault at 59 ip 000055a6c4010aaa sp 00007fff58563340 error 4 in monerod[55a6c3885000+10d3000]' i know it probably doesn't help but at least it could sched some light on type of the problem, maybe?
-
selsta
this was the v0.17.3.0 binary downloaded from getmonero.org?
-
ocb
this was with compiled from monero-linux-x64-0.17.3.0.tar.bz2
-
ocb
s/with//
-
selsta
compiled from?
-
ocb
yes binary, excuse me
-
selsta
ok
-
ocb
its 5 am
-
ocb
im a bit lost
-
selsta
np :D
-
ocb
i will wait for the next freeze but until then i would like to start another monerod 0.17.2.0 to use the same lmdb, is this possible?
-
ocb
i would like to start it to act as failover, as the services running are critical
-
selsta
running another daemon should work on the same lmdb
-
ocb
great, will go give it a try :) thanks for your time
-
ocb
thanks. just if anyone is interested, managed to get another monerod up with same lmdb its really straightforward just use the same data-dir as main monerod with different bind ports - monerod --data-dir /path/.bitmonero/ --rpc-bind-port 18091 --rpc-bind-ip=127.0.0.1 --restricted-rpc --p2p-bind-port 18090
-
ocb
interestingly, it is not allowed to run secondary monerod that uses the same lmdb as first node with 'exec' inside a docker entrypoint otherwise it will error out with 'Failed to create a read transaction for the db: Resource temporarily unavailable'. but running the first monerod will work with 'exec'
-
merope
Why would you want to run two monerod on the same machine
-
merope
Also, of course it blocks you: if it didn't, you'd have two programs trying to write to your blockchain file, which would corrupt it almost immediately
-
selsta
merope: monerod / lmdb supports two daemons with one blockchain file
-
eoc
the "local synchronization" mobile apps from
getmonero.org/downloads will donload the whole 120GB keychain?
-
eoc
do the typical used keep that 120GB keychain on their hd?
-
eoc
*user
-
merope
*blockchain
-
merope
It's optional, but it gives you the highest level of security. You can use somebody else's node ("remote node") to sync your wallet, but they could log some of your data or mess with you in some ways
-
merope
Note that there's also the --pruned-node option to occupy less storage space (~50GB)
-
eoc
merope: oh nice, didnt know about that pruned ... but also considering giving teens/young adults monero for christmas (ppl who prob never used crypto) ...
-
eoc
i guess the light wallets would be the best option
-
merope
Then using a remote node is the easiest option
-
dEBRUYNE
eoc: There's a few light wallets listed on the website
-
eoc
mhmhm
-
eoc
they still get their seed right?
-
dEBRUYNE
Yes
-
eoc
cool
-
eoc
oh btw, mining with monerod ... are you likely to make ANY monero with a very basic mini computer?
-
eoc
and is it quite secure to run 24/7 on a personal computer?
-
dEBRUYNE
Will you be using the personal computer for something else?
-
dEBRUYNE
eoc: Depends on how powerful your CPU is
-
eoc
dEBRUYNE: yes, its the computer i use, but mostly for light stuff like browsing .. maybe a movie..
-
eoc
no gaming etc..
-
dEBRUYNE
-
dEBRUYNE
Resource wise it should be okay, as monerod does not use many resources once it is fully synced
-
eoc
dEBRUYNE: damn, thats a nice feature..
-
hv-bridge
<Normsi> EN текст
-
eoc
does the pruning take long?
-
moneromooo
Exceedingly.
-
moneromooo
Don't prnue a fully grown db, you're better off resyncing.
-
eoc
moneromooo: with monerod --sync-pruned-blocks ?
-
moneromooo
Your question is missing a part. I can't answer it yet.
-
eoc
-
merope
eoc: regarding solo-mining, it's not really worth it. You're most likely to not find anything at all for months/years, so you're just gonna be wasting the electricity
-
merope
If you really want to mine a little bit, then you're better off mining on a mining pool (using xmrig) - but don't expect more than a few bucks worth of xmr per month unless you have a powerful cpu (like ryzen 3600/5600 or better)
-
merope
(Note that intel cpus are slower and less efficient than their amd counterparts)
-
eoc
merope: thanks! sounds like not for me tbh (i even have intel haha)