So, a new hardwallet special for monero comes out soon. From monerujo. Now, I have a question. Does anybody know seed lenght it will have? So maybe I can send some xmr to a wallet, not store the seed in my head and restore the wallet in the new cold wallet ehen it comes out

Store the seed in my head*

<sosse[m]1> "So, a new hardwallet special for..." <- It’s not a special hardware, but a android app

Can I see somewhere info about this?

Thanks, I'll try to search for info about this now

Does stagenet and mainnet run the same code? I'm learning the levin protocol, and the Handshake response messages look like they're encoded differently based on whether I connect to 192.110.160.146:18080 (mainnet seed node), vs 192.110.160.146:38080 (stagenet seed node)

Mainnet is returning a "local_peerlist_new", which encodes the field names of every item in the list (looks like every item has adr, addr, m_ip, m_port, F.type, and id fields)

Stagenet returns "local_peerlist", where it appears that 8kB of binary data is encoded in a single "string"

<nikg83[m]> "It’s not a special hardware, but..." <- I meant they're developing and/or waiting for finding for their hardwallet reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/oxvu8l…medium=android_app&utm_source=share

* I meant they're developing and/or waiting for funding for their hardwallet reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/oxvu8l…medium=android_app&utm_source=share

Docs say "Stagenet is technically equivalent to mainnet, both in terms of features and consensus rules", but not sure if the similarity also applies to the p2p protocol

Looks like there is some conditional logic around this: github.com/monero-project/monero/bl…c/p2p/p2p_protocol_defs.h#L197-L225, so maybe this is a bit in flux

<sosse[m]1> "I meant they're developing and/..." <- Monerujo SideKick is an Android app which is a functional replacement for dedicated Monero hardware wallets.

Hi, could somebody please briefly explain how memory pool / tx pool are stored ? or give a good link ?

I guess it's decentralized, but does each mining node have it's own tx pool ?

Or can it be shared between nodes mining together ?

Thanks.

zwischenzug, "github.com/monero-project/monero/bl…/master/src/p2p/p2p_protocol_defs.h", why did you look at that specific commit, but not master or release-v0.17 ?

zwischenzug: they use the same code, but they'll include an identifier in the handshake telling the other which network they are.

Halver[m]: they're stored in txpool_blob (the actual tx) and txpool_meta (metadata) tables.

Each node has its own, since they're not in the chain yet.

there is still a Delta between the #monero-dev:libera.chat and the #monero-dev:monero.social , isn't it?

Seems to be the occasional IRC message not getting through

hyc: could you take a look here? monero-project/monero #7957

you probably know that code part best

Isn't it Core's responsibility to maintain IRC and Matrix?

For Pete's sake someone needs to fix the bridge. Matrix users saw 1 of 2 of selsta 's messages.

It's nobody's. At a push, the person who put the bridge up. But they'd be totally in the right if they decided to take it down because can't be bothered fixing.

selsta: looks like a non-issue to me

I suppose it'd be good code hygiene to remove the unnecessary checks. and while I tried to make sure it was safe for multiple monerods to use the same DB concurrently, I no longer see any use case for it

it made more sense before we had tor/i2p integration, so you could run multiple monerods with different network settings

"As stewards of the project, the Core Team manages and maintains infrastructure where centralization cannot be avoided (domains, website, github repositories...)" web.getmonero.org/community/workgroups

The server is also described as the "Monero Core Team Matrix server" here:

We own the matrix server, Matrix own's the bridge.

Rucknium[m]: for the community channel maybe?

They are issues with the bridge that we have worked with them at length to resolve and are not due to misconfigs etc.

The Libera bridge has been flaky since the move from Freenode.

We're doing what we can but the issues are not something we can fix right now, as far as we can tell.

Seth: I see. Thanks for clarifying.

yw.

My main concern is that I have been telling potential researchers and devs to join the matrix server, and now the bridge is finicky again. Not your fault, of course.

Of course it's not ideal and causes issues, and will be fixed ASAP.

If user's have issues they can join the direct Libera channel via Matrix, i.e. #monero-dev:libera.chat

In theory that channel should not have issues, but again, that's all up to the Matrix team and is not supported or run by us at all.

I didn't realize the server was not matrix's. My comment is half mooted then.

Half moooted, if you will :D

I guess sooo.

hey ppl, I think someone from the Monero team should but monero.com. I see it's available now and if it isn't owned by the official monero team, pretty sure that's a huge risk for having very successful phishing attacks.

should buy, ofc*

s/but/buy/

s/hey ppl, I think someone from the Monero team should but monero.com. I see it's available now and if it isn't owned by the official monero team, pretty sure that's a huge risk for having very successful phishing attacks./hey ppl, I think someone from the Monero team should buy monero.com. I see it might be available now and if it isn't owned by the official monero team, pretty sure that's a huge risk for having very successful phishing

attacks./

it kinda sends the wrong message, regardless. monero isn't a company

Just buy it to re-direct elsewhere, maybe

rbrunner posted the backstory to this site on reddit. very interesting