-
alex[m]12345678Can't find the line that you need to add to the monerod configuration file for it to log RPC-related stuff in detail. We know `log-level=` but that's just for general. What if we just want to set the log level for RPC specifically in the config file?
-
moneromooo--log-level daemon.rpc.*:DEBUG. Maybe *rpc*:DEBUG,net.http*:DEBUG
-
nero-cultist[m]That's not the real moneromoo is it?
-
rbrunnerUkoeHB: A quick question, just curious: What would you predict, if I construct multisig wallets on your branch, should they be usable with current "master" or not?
-
rbrunnerFrom a test I did since I wrote the question above I suspect the answer is "no". Would be interesting to get confirmation based on "theory", and some hint what could be the problem
-
UkoeHBPretty sure they will work
-
rbrunnerHmm, just tried with a 2/2 wallet pair I constructed on your branch on "master" as of middle of September. I get the following error:
-
rbrunnerError: transaction <fa4cceee9cdfb9db73b61c5fd1c32b956d0f1f21564de0bc36facf01bacb4a90> was rejected by daemon Error: Reason: invalid input
-
rbrunnerNot sure that's a requirement, once your code goes into production, that probably won't play any role any more. I just wonder.
-
rbrunnerWhat I really want to do is test anon's "multisig fixes" and tried to take the shortcut to use wallet I had prepared on your branch already, which also ran into the same error.
-
rbrunnerI did run on anon's branch with a newly constructed 2/2 wallet pair.
-
rbrunner*It
-
UkoeHBHmm not sure why that would happen
-
UkoeHBOhh I think there was a slight change to tx building, I forgot
-
UkoeHBHad to change some weird janky stuff from prior implementation
-
rbrunnerAlright. I guess that won't matter, as your code gets into service with the hardfork, and all wallets and daemons will match again
-
rbrunnerSo for my tests now I will construct new wallets, and that's ok as well, just more work :)