-
jeffro256[m]selsta Are you in charge of the new RISV 64-bit CI build ?
-
r4v3r23[m]jberman: is background-sync code production ready? thinking about adding it to my wallet
-
jberman[m]I'll have it there by end of this week. Was just about to move back over to it
-
jberman[m]r4v3r23: IIRC the biggest thing it still needs is a check that it's enabled in commands that require usage of the spend key, so they error out and indicate the user should disable the mode. Like CHECK_MULTISIG_ENABLED
-
r4v3r23[m]jberman[m]: excellent, i was about to start work on the wallet sync part so this is perfect timing
-
jberman[m]nice :)
-
r4v3r23[m]<jberman[m]> "r4v3r23: IIRC the biggest..." <- not sure i follow here, when background sync is enabled user will have to disable it to use spend functions?
-
jberman[m]as implemented, when background sync is enabled, the spend key is wiped from memory. the spend key needs to be brought back into memory to be used (which requires the user to re-input their password). I implemented `disable_background_sync_mode` to accept the password as input and load the spend key:
-
jberman[m]
-
jberman[m]
-
r4v3r23[m]right, ok that makes sense
-
selstajeffro256[m]: not sure what you mean with in charge
-
selstaI added it to CI because there was an example for it in our README but otherwise I don't know much about RISC-V
-
selsta
-
plowsofi have been asked to approach a community work group (dev) to review my investigations at github.com/plowsof/verify-mb-gui-binaries
-
jeffro256[m]selsta do you know why the ccache job would loop for 6 hours before being canceled?
-
selstalink?
-
jeffro256[m]
-
jeffro256[m]Is it downloading something?
-
jeffro256[m]THe only messages are "Received x of 104621227 (y%), 0.0 MBs/sec"
-
selstacan you reproduce this? or did it only happen once?
-
selstaseems to be a github cache action bug
-
selstanever seem this before