who's here?

anybody using btcpay server with Monero should just turn it off

Mochi101 why, what's up?

Mochi101: MAGIC runs one. Is there a zero-day exploit?

let me rephrase

anybody using btcpay server with a digitally deliverable product and Monero should just turn it off

anybody intimate with that community?

who is seth?

as in sethforprivacy

seth has left the building

man... he's everywhere... but nowehre

i recreated the bug after 3 days with zmq / monero-lws 2022-11-19 13:36:12.620 E thrown at scanner.cpp:800: Too many open files

reproduced rather* will test the PR that fixes it selsta

<endogenic> "so use monero-lws" <- The another issue is in the way how I want it to run. By default I want it to be light-weight and not require a full node/indexer (like monero-lws, which still works with 1 wallet only) installed locally. But if a user has a full node, they would just point it to their full node's RPC. But by default it could use some well-known RPCs.

BTCPay has monero support currently but they are limited to 1 wallet per server! which is not what I want, I want to support unlimited number of wallets on same instance like we do with other coins

Our friend is still trying...

<bit_thanos[m]> "Screenshot_20221120-094601_1.png" <- Who is that guy?

It's true that Dero's elliptic curve (Barreto-Naehrig) isn't that strong, it archieves ~90-100 bits of security (versus Monero's elliptic curve Ed25519 which has 128-bit security), but I don't think it's still that easy to break it

He's a troll

He's "testing his code locally to not burn thousands of dollars on proxies". We will never understand

I consider such things always win-win: They win, we will be able to eliminate a weakness or exploit; we win, they fall on their face.

I don't see how DDoSing seed nodes would put Monero at danger and cause a chain split

Of course posting the problem on HackerOne would be even better, if there is one, but can't have all.

"i'm still working on poisoning xmr peerlists" twitter.com/chainrx/status/1593930333665345537

<Siren[m]> "He's a troll" <- fireice_uk wannabe

Oh come on, not that shit in -dev again please.

sowry sowry, ill show myself out :3

Sir, I have a feature suggestion about monero gui. After clicking the create new wallet tab in monero gui, 25 new private keys will appear. I don't think it should be. I think there should be a password entry after clicking the create new wallet tab. private keys should appear censored after password entry (like metamask). Private keys may appear after clicking OK. With this feature, there will be no waste in creating new words and

it will be better.

Chesterfield sir, why did you react like that?

#monero-gui

Anybody here also part of the BTCPay community?

Seems Monero is not liked by some of the main devs over in BTCPay community.

if anybody wants to try and fix it please contact me

Well I try to create an alternative, but for now I came to conclusion that the easiest way is to disable payouts feature for monero because it's too complex to implement in a multi-walet environment

Accepting payments part is clear on how to implement for me having only a daemon RPC connection

mrnaif, should be an easy fix

How?

check lock against height

I'm no programmer though

Well no, they use wallet-rpc, which limits them to only one wallet per server. That's why I want it to work with only daemon RPC connection and nothing else, removing the limitation

oh... you're doing something different... fml

rip btcpay server users

I found the following options:... (full message at <libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/do…b80562c5d66cd3b9098b17309e119432a2c>)

sorry... I don't know about that

when you create a wallet....

I think there's an option to just trust that it's 0

rather than going through the chain

Well, to send transactions I need outputs fetched at least, plus craft that transaction object. But transaction object can be crafted only by wallet2's cpp code it looks like.

set restore height to -100 blocks or something

-10

think outside the box

But what if it has incorrect outputs data? The balance would be less than expected and it won't send?

I mean, if it doesn't read older data it won't know about balance at all

I thought you were creating a NEW wallet

not restoring an old one

yeah.. there's a tax there

Well, user can enter anything they want in UI I think

no way around it

I think mymonero let users upload something to make it easier

well, maybe good idea to state that as limitation, hmm, thanks for another approach

like an export of outputs

Well, after digging through mymonero code they probably still call that cpp function to create transaction, not sure

yeah

well.. good luck

Why do you want to use BTCPay server anyways?

I don't. I am creating my own solution, basically adding monero support to the main btcpay's competitor in opensource space (:

ok

<mrnaif[m]> "I don't. I am creating my own..." <- Who is their primary competitor?

mrnaif Mochi101 you could just ask me. i wrote or ported virtually all of the mymonero code

client side

endogenic, for btcpay server?

mymonero

oooh

right

?

ran it for four years

yknow

Yeah, I forgot.

lol

and then there was the "unprofessional" moment?

Still curious...

no

there were many before that

lol

i merely disclosed them

you must not have forgotten then

you guys still astound me

letting people lie to you

anyway i guess you cant do anything about it

Truthfylly I have no idea what it's all about.

I just remember reading some things.

i'm not safe or i'd tell you

i've been threatened

there's so much the monero community needs to know

by who?

so much influence has occurred

oh man

it's sad watching monero be kept back

but i'm working on it

Web Wallet?

i went into virtual hiding for years. slept with a gun

and went into debt

frankly even before i left mm

so.

gonna get back to it. dont forget about my story tho

you guys need to kniw

come to the dark side... -pools is always open

better to talk there