-
m-relay<m808:matrix.org> Is it expected that `monero-wallet-cli` with the `--generate-from-view-key` flag isn't able to parse a testnet address (no problem with a mainnet address) (Returning `Error: failed to parse address`) when asking for the Standard address, even with the `--testnet` flag ?
-
sech1No, it should work with testnet addresses. You probably found a bug.
-
j7771122hello, everyone, I wanna create my own token at monero network. What is solution?
-
sech1You can't
-
j7771122why? this network does not provide custom token like ERC20, BRC20?
-
sech1Thank God it does not
-
m-relay<endor00:matrix.org> Turns out, you don't actually need a token for most things
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> hmm
-
j7771122I need really my token. then what is solution?
-
sech1ERC20, BRC20?
-
m-relay<123bob123:matrix.org> What about json web token
-
gingeropolous7345 needs a review... from my perspective, all the changes are in network code
-
m-relay<jeffro256:monero.social> moneromooo: what is the point of the merge mining slots ?
-
m-relay<jeffro256:monero.social> Why not order lexographicaly?
-
sech1jeffro256 if you order lexicographically, then you to send all merge mined chain IDs together with the merkle proof to prove that you don't mined double spends/alternative chains
-
sech1*you need to send
-
sech1this was initially developed in namecoin in 2011: forum.namecoin.org/viewtopic.php?p=1617#p1617
-
sech1yes, you can just order lexicographically, but it will make proof to be O(N) bytes instead of O(logN)
-
m-relay<jeffro256:monero.social> Ah that makes a lot of sense, thanks for that