-
***
Buffer Playback...
-
tobtoht
[15:52:26] Are you going to build Qt with gstreamer support or just install it with apt?
-
Guest6033
[15:52:50] maybe apt easier?
-
Guest6033
[15:53:06] to say the truth until now nothing worked!
-
Guest6033
[15:53:15] i had problem with apt
-
Guest6033
[15:53:26] when installing gstreamer only
-
Guest6033
[15:53:39] some dpkg problems
-
tobtoht
[15:53:41] I have a working Dockerfile for Qt5.15+gstreamer
-
tobtoht
[15:53:53] but apt will be easier for sure
-
Guest6033
[15:54:05] give docker lets c
-
Guest6033
[15:54:38] someone that have more knowledge must help
-
tobtoht
[15:54:44] feather/Dockerfile
-
Guest6033
[15:54:44] qr scanner is very improtant
-
Guest6033
[15:55:00] and must work easily everywhere
-
tobtoht
[15:55:16] again it's missing the Qt Quick modules, so you'll have to add those
-
Guest6033
[15:55:43] ok
-
tobtoht
[15:55:56] yeah I don't see that happening on Linux any time soon
-
tobtoht
[15:56:01] not on release builds anyways
-
Guest6033
[15:56:14] github version of linux gui is static?
-
Guest6033
[15:56:23] release version i mean
-
tobtoht
[15:56:33] yes
-
Guest6033
[15:56:52] how they did that and i cant
-
Guest6033
[15:57:26] i download it and try but is strange
-
Guest6033
[15:57:31] selsta?
-
tobtoht
[15:57:42] what is strange about it?
-
Guest6033
[15:58:12] that i cant compile
-
Guest6033
[15:58:16] static
-
Guest6033
[15:58:34] i dont do anything just clone compile dockerfile
-
tobtoht
[15:58:56] does the dockerfile not build?
-
Guest6033
[15:59:41] build but qr dont work
-
tobtoht
[15:59:51] that's expected
-
tobtoht
[15:59:55] gstreamer is missing
-
selsta
-
selsta
[16:03:20] these steps with scanner enabled should be enough to get the scanner working
-
malinero
[18:11:40] Hi guys, i'd like to publish and maintain my own android build of the GUI on playstore, but do so in an ethical/non-scam-ish way.
-
malinero
[18:11:40] But if i mention monero i look like a scammer, and if i don't, i won't be abiding by the license and giving proper credits (which is unethical).
-
malinero
[18:11:40] So is it enough if i don't call it "monero-wallet-gui", change the logo but still mentions monero in the description and add warnings about how much untrusted/untested/un... it is ?
-
malinero
[18:11:40] What would you recommend ?
-
selsta
[18:13:29] hmm, as long as you make it clear that isn't released by monero core team it should be finne
-
selsta
[18:13:30] fine
-
malinero
[18:14:22] okay, thanks selsta
-
malinero
[19:20:30] jftr, here's what i submitted
paste.debian.net/hidden/8e5aac35 Hope it's clear enough :)
-
dEBRUYNE
[19:21:29] Perhaps 'DO NOT USE IT' ought to be replaced by 'for testing purposes only'?
-
dEBRUYNE
[19:21:40] You arguably want users such that the product gets tested no?
-
malinero
[19:25:59] I initially want an easy way to distribute and test it with close friends. I think it could be nice for the project to have more testers, but i'm kinda afraid of the inevitable moment when someone will hit a bug or do stg stupid and sees missing moneroj. But i like your suggestion, so i'll change accordingly
-
malinero
[19:29:29] (btw and fwiw, i'm MoroccanMalinois, this is just a less secure (mobile access) identity and shorter nickname :) )
-
luigi1111w
[19:52:06] maybe just "Unofficial personal build of monero-wallet-gui. NOT released by The Monero Project; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!"
-
malinero
[21:25:42] tbh, it should be quiet from an IRL work's perspective this summer, so i'm trying to make an I2P *embedded* integration (far from ready), and i wanted an easy way to try this with my friends (I have already been physically surveilled when i started playing with Tor / I2P in 2016/2017 so my anonymity is already f***** up), so what i originally
-
malinero
[21:25:42] planned was to deploy versions that might be quite insecure from a privacy perspective (i.e. with unmerged PRs, with known privacy vulns like not changing the RouterInfo identity when the public IP address changes ... ) and most probably quite unstable.
-
malinero
[21:25:42] But i'm realizing that it might be usefull to have an unofficial build, but with stability (and a more secure build env) in mind (until core team starts deploying official releases :) ).
-
malinero
[21:25:42] So maybe i'll just deploy 2 apps. One that tries to be serious and says "USE AT YOUR OWN RISK", one that includes more risky changes and says "for testing purposes only" (in addition to "Not released by The Monero Project")
-
***
Playback Complete.