Buffer Playback...

[11:01:59] Maybe "my govt kicks doors down on I2P/tor usage".

[11:02:34] But as long as it's a first startup yes/no setting, I think there's no reason not to.

[11:02:47] I thought it was already automated in fact.

[11:08:37] thanks mooo, maybe i missed stg, but i don't think it's already automated

[11:10:48] You probably know better than me :)

[11:17:45] One last question: what do you think about embedding the java i2p implementation instead of i2pd ? I know it's weird and i'm not looking for drama, but i believe they do not offer the same level of privacy and JNI (java native interface) makes it quite easy to control java objects from C/C++

[04:10:04] malinero, i think the reservations regarding java embedding were resolved when some magic happened that made i2p-zero happen.

[04:10:48] basically, whatever knaccc did with i2p-zero made it so the java i2p thing isn't as ermagerd as it once was

[04:10:59] thats the feeling i got from my end of the peanut gallery

[04:11:22] but at the end of the day, make the PR, then stuff will happen

[08:46:50] Thanks gingeropolous, i will

[01:58:05] .merge+ 3614

[01:58:05] Added

[02:12:20] it occurred to me that it must be causing enormous confusion that the GUI uses both the terms daemon and node. There is a section in 'settings' called 'node', which refers to 'local node' and 'remote node'. But the button to start/stop the node is called 'start/stop daemon', and the progress bars say 'waiting for daemon to sync' and 'daemon blocks remaining'. Is there any reason to not just

[02:12:22] pick one term and stick to it?

[03:05:29] no particular reason as far as I know

[05:57:11] doo eet

[07:57:23] hello

Playback Complete.

.merge+ 3613

Added

.merges

.merge+ 3593

Added

I will be mostly gone for about 2 weeks starting Monday. I will do all the merges before that, but if you want something in get it in (or ask fluffy or something).

selsta 3565

luigi1111w: updated

thanks