<m​onerobull:matrix.org> hello

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> why doesnt the new gui connect to my node

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> monero-project/monero #9235#issuecomment-1987596301 ?

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> lol of course

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> i set a rpc password and the very next release breaks it

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> rip

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> and whats wrong with the other nodes?

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> without password

DE node @ node3.monerodevs.org:18089 with spare bandwidth

Monerobull can you connect to nodes without password fine in the gui? Surely

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> No

<m​onerobull:matrix.org> Tried xmrvsbeast and tux.pizza

Cant test until the afternoon selsta

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> 50 lashes for jeffro?

plowsof: i think you can connect when switching from local node to remote node with it already selected

basically select -> it fails to connect -> click on local node -> switch back to remote node and it should connect

what i'm most annoyed is that i saw this before release but i thought it's a GUI bug because i usually don't use rpc-login

selsta getmonero.org/2024/03/09/monero-GUI-0.18.3.2-released.html "Update p2pool to v3.8" it's v3.10

will update the release notes

"i set a rpc password and the very next release breaks it" << its been on master for 5mths. I feel partially at fault for not noticing

Havent run master in a long time, and i use these features

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> ofrnxmr matrix account unbanned in #monero-gui:monero.social by plowsof

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> Thank fck

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> What about naptha ?

<k​inghat:matrix.org> BigmenPixel: whats left to get the flatpak verified on flathub and then it can be added to the website as a suggested install?

<k​inghat:matrix.org> oh looks like: flathub/flathub #3905#issuecomment-1872557613

<1​23bob123:matrix.org> How come it was relying on one person?

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Bigmen has been maintaining for a long time

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> The problem is that we wanted it to be more "official", but the roadblock is that flathub is anything but official

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> Tobtoht's featherwallet flatpak is shipped in the most ideal way, imho. Not sure how difficult it would be ship like that

i don't want any extra work regarding flatpak, if it's something we have someone else has to maintain it

<t​obtoht:monero.social> ofrnxmr: easy to upstream once #8929 is merged

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> That's amazing news

<o​frnxmr:monero.social> And +1, selsta

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> for bigmenpixel, i think reaching out to community to approve payout for his entire CCS (1 year of maintenance will be over this month, and from affar he has been performing duties / more work than the debian/whonix maintainer did for certain). then coming back to the table seeking opinions on this flatHUB / flatpak situation. afaict the "work" (the workflow for packaging / pushin<clipped message>

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> g binaries to a flatpak server) has been done

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> one look at the install/update stats for flathub shows how valuable (or... dangerous) flathub is and im uneducated on how to proceed

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> klausenbusk.github.io/flathub-stats…ity&downloadType=installs%2Bupdates

<p​lowsof:matrix.org> i can offer an opinion and say yeah, ofcourse get the verified checkmark, why not? hashes can be confirmed for the github workflow (thats done on monero-core repo) and the client but im sitting here with a hardware wallet