-
chad[m]IIRC, sarang confirmed the break. It is not safe to use Arcturus (at least as originally described).
-
sarang?
-
sarangDid I miss a related message about Arcturus?
-
selsta<corklander> So to the room: is the recent paper on Arcturus' Dual-Target Discrete Logarithm broken assumption correct? If Arcturus is DOA then it will affect my plans for starting a daemon language upgrade.
-
selstaIf I get OPs in this room I can regularly voice everyone in case no one else wants to do it...
-
sarangThe cryptographic assumption is indeed broken, making Arcturus unsafe to use in production
-
sarangThe preprint has been withdrawn from the IACR archive, but previous versions are still available there (per the archive's policy)
-
fluffyponyselsta: fixed
-
fluffyponyI didn't see that message either btw, and I have ops
-
fluffyponyso not sure if the bridge choked?
-
selstaI copied it from matrix
-
fluffyponyyeah must have been a bridge issue
-
utxobr[m]pretty recent (Date of Publication: 09 June 2021) paper on an improvement to a previous proof of reserves on monero: ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9449918 have you taken a look / contribute to it? sounds pretty interesting (I didn't finish the read yet, and the math is definitely above my capabilities)
-
dEBRUYNEutxobr[m]: As a side note, did you post your CCS proposal on Reddit for review?
-
utxobr[m]dEBRUYNE: not yet actually, good point on posting on reddit! I want to record a second demo (very likely this weekend) with some experiments I've got in a branch, I think once I publish then I can post it there 👍️ any recommendations? just a plain post pointing at it?
-
dEBRUYNEYou can create a thread that includes both the demo and a link to your ccs proposal
-
coinstudent2048[Hmm... MProve+ paper above looks interesting. I'll take a read (hopefully scihub works 😭 )
-
coinstudent2048[* Hmm... MProve+ paper above looks interesting. I'll take a read (hopefully <del>scihub works</del> oh very new paper 😭)
-
sarangOh interesting; I remember seeing the original MProve preprint, but not this updated version
-
chad[m]Does anyone have a non-paywalled link to the MProve+ paper? Idk why IEEE insists on paywalls
-
gingeropolous[m]chad: sometimes you can get around those by using noscript
-
coinstudent2048[I ...actually managed to get a copy thru vpn of my univ I graduated. Please wait...
-
» coinstudent2048[ posted a file: (564KiB) <libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/do…GqiNKvSGdpTfPYRqGC/09449918%202.pdf>
-
spackle[m]I reached out to Arijit, and he provided the following link. I'll post it here in case anyone wants a more official source: arijitdutta67.github.io/homepage/paper/MProvePlus.pdf
-
coinstudent2048[Oops, I didn't thought of that. Deleted my copy.