Woooooo

<plowsof[m]> "can one of the people qualified..." <- manual censorship for those who are setting wrong emojis, endor00 is it you ?

ooo123ooo1234567: I think its erciccione.. hes admin here. I dont think endor is a mod in mrl

<binaryFate> "ErCiccione: ok you're OP now for..." <- ^

w: You don't lose any occasion to throw shit at me, don't you?

<ErCiccione> "w: You don't lose any occasion..." <- -lab

I'm pretty interested in PLSAG. It sounds like we may have one more RCT hard fork. PLSAG + TX chaining (or deterministic binning, as it's either or) + I may write up a spec for a burning bug immune RCT address format...

kayabanerve[m]: What is PLSAG?

The last may get left to Seraphis, yet PLSAG is the perfect opportunity for a transcript format allowing TX chaining. If we don't do deterministic binning, there's no reason not to enable that now and start getting protocols built AFAIK.

dEBRUYNE: A more efficient LSAG which does a single signature for all inputs

Yet unlike the MLSAG which had that... It doesn't require they share an index from my understand

Because MLSAG nuked privacy if you did .-.

There was just a lightning talk on it at MoneroKon. I'm not here to say it's suitably reviewed. I'm here to say I'm interested 👀

kayabanerve[m]: Thank you for your commment, I am the presentator of PLSAG

And I do want to start discussing the next RCT HF q bit more tbh. I don't want to stagnate for two years on Seraphis. While I'd rather move up seraphis, there's obviously difficulties doing so with any timing question.

harutoooo[m]: Really interesting work. I'll probably try to read the paper over the next week or so. Maybe get it going in rust...

AFAIK it uses common indices

Unless I misread the paper

UkoeHB: I thought that was the explicit distinction from MLSAG, as I peered on a conversation about it here before

actually , I'm still writing the paper, just finish draft roughly

kayabanerve[m]: iirc it is a more efficient version of MLSAG

and PLSAG is middle way between MLSAG and CLSAG.

Just pulled up the April 14 discussion. Yep, looks like I misread it.

Btw anyone know if monerokon will release videos of the talks?

So far more performant, yet with the privacy hit :/

UkoeHB: I'd assume after? Ask #monero-events:monero.social

According to the Twitter, yes, videos will be made available after

But yeah. I think that has a privacy hit far too significant to be considerable. Guess I bit the hype of a quality presentation :p

john_r365[m]: thanks

I still plan to review the paper and potentially write an impl. Excited to see how it finalizes harutoooo :)

Thank you 👍️ kayabanerve