if its optional and has the potential to create puddles, we could also see how far we can push the ringsize to overcompensate.

from what I gather, we're expecting a ringsize of 128.... peraps when seraphis rolls out with a ADI API.... machines can handle ringsize 1024 ?

remember that verification time increase is linear. 1024 vs 16 means txn verification will be 64x more CPU intensive.

will CPUs be 64x faster by then? doubtful.

im talkin seraphis, not the current thing

but i guess your statement still holds. basically i thought seraphis would roll out with ringsize 128. i think 64 or 128 has been in discussion. so if we need to keep tx_extra because ... reasons, then perhaps we can just bump ringsize a bit

reasons :)

ADF = Arbitrary Data Field. perhaps a new name for tx_extra will help distinguish that we're talking about when seraphis happens, and not the extant tx_extra

tx_shitcoinflag

tx_whatisthst

hey hey, we're in the lab.

ADF and ADI are serious suggestions? or is it the profanity thats an issue?

i thought you were /s

is there any eta for seraphis yet?

heinrich[m], I'm afraid not yet

afaik

Hey hey :)

good morning. anything in particular?

Not really, was just reading about the tx_extra debate and then landed here

nohello.net is good etiquette. pinging people at work for no reason is not 🙏

Oh sorry, didn't know things are so strict here.

#monero:monero.social and #monero-offtopic:monero.social for les and even less strict

Thanks! :)

Or #monero-research-lounge:monero.social