<c​haserene:matrix.org> I'm in support of scripting that doesn't meaningfully decrease privacy. scripting is probably needed for side-stepping issues with the 10-block lock and relatively slow finality, and it allows for a broad range of applications (imagine a programmable layer 2 that has its state changes validated by the monero blockchain and XMR can be bridged to/from it, but other than that, it doe<clipped message>

<c​haserene:matrix.org> sn't affect the main chain). there may be ways to have our cake and eat it too, kayaba kicked off a discussion about this a month ago: monero-project/research-lab #116

scripting is a bit of a meaningless term imo.. not a good one.. we already have a subset of scripting

and turing completeness is just some ideal

whereas there are real problems that augmentations to our current "scripting" needs

<c​haserene:matrix.org> what is that subset? the only ones I know are certain scriptless scripts described by a handful of research papers. I haven't seen any of them implemented.